Mintberry Crunch

Mintberry Crunch — CS2 Stats

US76561197981418847[U:1:21153119]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,983Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,623Top 25% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#45265 of 242652 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 1 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,623 +3,297 1 Jul – 22 Sept · 22 days played
19,32623,669peak 23,6691 Jul22 Sept
23,790Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-07-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,046 below peak (23,669)
  • -271 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,297 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,377 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMintberry CrunchFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,623 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning53
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateLLLWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility7.3
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch4.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.3
Utility7.3
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time586ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 6 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · mirage, 15 Jul →
375msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 1 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 18mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3114–1745%-0.02
cacheS1812–667%-0.01
anubisB136–746%-0.01
nukeA116–555%-0.00
ancientC104–640%-0.02
infernoS96–367%-0.00
mirageD61–517%-0.02
office—10–10%-0.15
overpass—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,853Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
82.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10747%0.9915.3
Anubis10156%1.0715.8
Inferno9159%1.1115.0
Dust28948%1.0114.9
Mirage8845%0.8412.6
Vertigo3352%1.0616.7
Overpass2955%1.1015.8
Nuke2836%0.8413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
587msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
12.8%Flash assists
9.01HE damage / grenade
16.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0892% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–130.0217%22 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0712%10 Sept →
dust25–130.0020%3 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0319%3 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0913%1 Sept →
cache13–50.0416%1 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0523%1 Sept →
ancient7–130.0011%31 Aug →
mirage11–130.0418%30 Aug →
dust213–50.0325%30 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0212%30 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0410%25 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0116%25 Aug →
nuke13–90.0515%21 Aug →
anubis13–70.0716%21 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0117%20 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0215%20 Aug →
anubis13–100.0018%19 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0113%19 Aug →
cache11–13-0.046%19 Aug →
dust213–80.0420%19 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0211%18 Aug →
ancient13–1-0.0111%18 Aug →
cache5–13-0.076%18 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0126%18 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0610%18 Aug →
cache13–90.0333%13 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.047%13 Aug →
cache16–13-0.0613%13 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0614%11 Aug →
dust213–90.0515%11 Aug →
cache13–80.0420%11 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0121%11 Aug →
dust213–30.0119%11 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0411%11 Aug →
anubis16–130.0211%8 Aug →
nuke9–130.0015%8 Aug →
dust27–130.0319%8 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0312%8 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0831%8 Aug →
inferno15–150.0325%7 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0316%7 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0112%7 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0411%7 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0611%7 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0324%6 Aug →
cache13–30.0718%6 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0418%6 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0112%6 Aug →
anubis13–90.0211%6 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0615%4 Aug →
dust213–60.0314%4 Aug →
nuke13–90.0120%4 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0114%4 Aug →
ancient7–130.0614%4 Aug →
cache13–5-0.019%4 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0311%4 Aug →
inferno11–130.0418%2 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0920%2 Aug →
cache13–60.0018%2 Aug →
dust28–130.0113%2 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0211%2 Aug →
cache16–130.0111%1 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0313%1 Aug →
office0–13-0.1513%1 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0214%1 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0115%1 Aug →
inferno12–30.0322%1 Aug →
cache13–50.0613%31 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0940%15 Jul →
cache1–7-0.1025%14 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0320%13 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0316%13 Jul →
nuke16–130.0612%13 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0219%13 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0116%10 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0216%9 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0316%9 Jul →
dust25–13-0.090%9 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0621%9 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0213%9 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0613%9 Jul →
nuke1–13-0.0410%9 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0414%9 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0718%4 Jul →
cache13–50.0629%4 Jul →
overpass8–13-0.0433%4 Jul →
anubis12–16-0.016%4 Jul →
ancient13–90.0419%4 Jul →
ancient13–110.0016%3 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0320%3 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0115%3 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0117%3 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0116%3 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0030%3 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0117%3 Jul →
dust210–130.0115%2 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0314%2 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0513%1 Jul →
dust213–30.0525%1 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →