m1gZ

m1gZ — CS2 Stats

US76561197980970403[U:1:20704675]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

464Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,692Blue band · top ~45.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 464 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 8 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,692 +204 8 Aug20 Sept · 15 days played
10,60411,692peak 11,6928 Aug20 Sept
11,884Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-08

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 11,692
  • +477 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,308 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGm1gZFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,692 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning42
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57412Last 10057%Win rateWLWWLWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 10

  • 721 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility4.7
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time605ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 10.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 6 Sept
30%Best headshot accuracy · 12–16 · cache, 6 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · inferno, 27 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24121250%-0.02
nukeS2013765%-0.01
cacheA1810856%-0.00
mirageS129375%-0.02
anubisC94544%-0.00
infernoS97278%0.06
ancientD62433%-0.02
vertigo1010%0.01
poseidon1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

138Matches
48%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
65.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3256%0.7911.8
Dust23142%0.9515.5
Cache2654%0.8712.8
Nuke1850%0.9213.7
Anubis1354%0.9012.6
Ancient922%1.1117.9
Inferno825%0.8012.6
Overpass1100%1.0014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
72.0%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
623msReaction time
17.9%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
8.71HE damage / grenade
9.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.5009% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.9081% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.046%12 Sept
nuke3–13-0.1110%12 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0213%12 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0214%11 Sept
cache9–13-0.0022%11 Sept
cache13–00.0312%11 Sept
cache13–6-0.014%10 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0219%10 Sept
anubis12–120.0224%10 Sept
dust213–20.0224%10 Sept
mirage8–13-0.053%10 Sept
dust29–13-0.0710%8 Sept
dust213–7-0.0319%8 Sept
dust29–13-0.0619%7 Sept
nuke13–70.059%7 Sept
ancient3–13-0.049%7 Sept
cache13–40.0511%7 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0719%7 Sept
inferno9–5-0.1210%6 Sept
inferno9–00.2414%6 Sept
cache12–16-0.0430%6 Sept
dust29–13-0.0313%5 Sept
anubis9–13-0.095%5 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0510%5 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0017%5 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0110%5 Sept
anubis9–130.0114%5 Sept
dust213–8-0.0120%3 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0218%31 Aug
nuke9–4-0.0615%31 Aug
dust27–13-0.0716%30 Aug
inferno9–60.0913%29 Aug
nuke9–6-0.0513%29 Aug
dust27–130.0012%28 Aug
inferno9–50.1617%27 Aug
inferno9–40.2324%27 Aug
dust213–80.0116%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0416%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0215%27 Aug
cache13–30.008%27 Aug
nuke9–130.0310%26 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0211%26 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0019%24 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0117%24 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0818%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0210%24 Aug
cache10–13-0.0612%23 Aug
dust214–16-0.046%22 Aug
dust213–90.0018%21 Aug
ancient13–100.0011%21 Aug
cache19–15-0.0015%21 Aug
cache13–2-0.009%20 Aug
dust213–5-0.0115%20 Aug
dust211–130.0015%20 Aug
vertigo12–120.017%20 Aug
nuke13–90.1017%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0911%20 Aug
mirage13–7-0.046%20 Aug
cache13–9-0.0211%20 Aug
mirage6–00.0110%19 Aug
cache7–13-0.043%19 Aug
anubis13–110.0710%19 Aug
mirage13–20.024%19 Aug
dust213–9-0.005%18 Aug
ancient2–13-0.055%18 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0210%18 Aug
cache6–13-0.049%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0213%17 Aug
dust25–130.0212%17 Aug
dust213–160.0514%17 Aug
anubis13–70.067%17 Aug
cache13–90.0314%16 Aug
dust219–17-0.048%16 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0715%16 Aug
dust213–40.0215%16 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0213%12 Aug
nuke13–160.0218%12 Aug
nuke19–170.0010%11 Aug
cache13–110.076%11 Aug
dust25–4-0.120%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.078%10 Aug
inferno9–20.108%10 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0313%10 Aug
nuke13–30.1211%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0110%10 Aug
mirage13–60.029%10 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0410%9 Aug
dust213–10.0115%9 Aug
anubis13–8-0.037%9 Aug
mirage13–110.008%9 Aug
nuke16–14-0.037%9 Aug
cache9–130.0310%8 Aug
cache9–13-0.007%8 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.116%8 Aug
nuke9–5-0.2211%8 Aug
inferno5–9-0.150%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0418%8 Aug
nuke13–110.039%8 Aug
cache11–130.0017%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.075%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →