Deuzzs Inc

Deuzzs Inc — CS2 Stats

AR76561197980011020[U:1:19745292]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,746Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,382Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68629 of 222876 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,897 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 23 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,382 +953 25 Aug13 Sept · 12 days played
19,42920,382peak 20,38225 Aug13 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,897 +0 29 Aug8 Sept · 5 observations
1,8971,897peak 1,89729 Aug8 Sept
20,382Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,897Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,897
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 104 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,382
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,618 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDeuzzs IncFACEITLevel 9 · 1,897 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,382 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,897csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning75
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateWWLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 419ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.7
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 71% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 71% on T to 56% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning7.5
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time485ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 509ms → last ⅓ avg 485ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 17 Sept
62%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · anubis, 17 Sept
352msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · dust2, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
158In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 25mirageWeakest map · 37% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27101737%0.01
dust2A2516964%0.02
anubisA1911858%-0.00
ancientB147750%0.02
cacheC52340%-0.03
inferno31233%0.02
nuke32167%0.01
awp_lego_21010%-0.07
aim_awp_river1010%-0.07
awp_india110100%0.04
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,492Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
82.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage43350%1.1216.7
Dust223047%1.0716.9
Ancient17055%1.1316.5
Inferno13550%1.1416.9
Anubis13052%1.1617.7
Vertigo6258%1.0616.4
Nuke6237%0.9616.0
Cache2450%1.0615.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.1%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
482msReaction time
71.4%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
8.15HE damage / grenade
10.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.0518%17 Sept
dust213–6-0.0135%17 Sept
ancient7–130.0028%17 Sept
anubis13–30.1162%17 Sept
ancient12–160.0924%17 Sept
cache10–13-0.0221%16 Sept
ancient13–90.0219%16 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0311%16 Sept
dust27–13-0.0139%16 Sept
anubis13–110.0238%16 Sept
mirage19–170.0227%15 Sept
anubis13–100.0526%15 Sept
dust219–160.0732%15 Sept
anubis12–16-0.0311%15 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0229%14 Sept
dust213–100.0329%14 Sept
anubis5–13-0.1425%14 Sept
dust24–13-0.0612%14 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0615%14 Sept
cache13–8-0.0623%14 Sept
ancient13–50.0136%14 Sept
mirage13–100.0332%14 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0720%13 Sept
dust213–8-0.0029%13 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0235%13 Sept
dust29–130.0241%13 Sept
dust213–50.0718%13 Sept
anubis13–160.0011%12 Sept
anubis13–90.0122%12 Sept
dust213–100.0718%12 Sept
mirage11–130.0121%12 Sept
dust211–130.0324%12 Sept
cache10–13-0.0327%11 Sept
mirage13–50.0836%11 Sept
dust216–120.0421%11 Sept
ancient13–80.0314%11 Sept
dust213–80.0930%11 Sept
mirage5–130.0018%11 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0433%11 Sept
anubis9–130.0126%11 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0122%10 Sept
cache13–110.0646%10 Sept
nuke16–120.0634%9 Sept
inferno13–110.0126%9 Sept
mirage13–30.0741%9 Sept
ancient13–80.0535%9 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0414%9 Sept
dust213–10-0.0432%9 Sept
ancient6–130.0429%9 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0025%9 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0432%8 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0225%7 Sept
mirage13–110.0228%7 Sept
mirage15–150.0136%6 Sept
ancient9–130.0118%6 Sept
ancient15–15-0.0215%6 Sept
mirage13–00.0236%6 Sept
mirage13–70.0532%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.0425%5 Sept
dust28–13-0.0129%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0114%5 Sept
dust213–30.0538%5 Sept
dust213–80.0938%5 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0217%4 Sept
dust211–13-0.0236%4 Sept
dust27–13-0.006%4 Sept
dust213–90.0535%4 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0241%3 Sept
mirage13–6-0.056%3 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0026%3 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0332%1 Sept
ancient13–110.0334%1 Sept
inferno9–130.0424%1 Sept
awp_lego_210–13-0.070%31 Aug
aim_awp_river10–13-0.070%31 Aug
awp_india13–110.040%31 Aug
ancient13–20.0917%31 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0318%31 Aug
anubis16–140.0417%31 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0321%30 Aug
mirage13–160.0821%30 Aug
cache4–13-0.0719%28 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0243%28 Aug
ancient13–30.0018%28 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0038%28 Aug
dust218–22-0.0041%27 Aug
anubis19–170.0445%27 Aug
mirage10–130.0535%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0120%26 Aug
anubis13–70.0223%26 Aug
mirage2–130.0741%26 Aug
dust213–90.0146%25 Aug
mirage11–130.0629%25 Aug
dust213–110.0915%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.0713%25 Aug
dust213–30.0825%24 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0416%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0414%24 Aug
mirage16–140.0419%24 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0014%23 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →