NanuX #fu-\/alve

NanuX #fu-\/alve — CS2 Stats

76561197979842674[U:1:19576946]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,518Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20540 of 242715 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,000 → 25,000
+2Tracked matches · now 1,518
0.0ppWin rate · 62.1% → 62.1%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 14 Feb 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 -464 23 Apr – 16 Sept · 8 days played
24,61225,649peak 25,64923 Apr16 Sept
25,649Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-02-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 649 below peak (25,649)
  • +388 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-16
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNanuX #fu-\/alveFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning58
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateWWWLWLLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility5.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning5.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time502ms−89ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 21 Aug →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · inferno, 24 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 24 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3316–1748%0.01
dust2B2413–1154%0.00
nukeA106–460%0.01
anubisA106–460%-0.01
mirageA95–456%0.02
ancientD92–722%0.01
overpass—32–167%0.03
cache—11–0100%0.14
train—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,109Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
81.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust214256%1.1316.6
Inferno12660%1.2317.4
Anubis9255%1.0515.2
Ancient6932%0.9716.5
Nuke3168%1.1716.3
Cache1656%0.9214.6
Vertigo1547%0.9317.0
Mirage1242%1.1515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
7.0°Preaim
527msReaction time
43.8%T opening success
52.5%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
10.65HE damage / grenade
6.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4842 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.0830%9 Sept →
nuke13–40.0926%7 Sept →
dust213–80.0121%7 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0323%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.0210%6 Sept →
ancient11–130.0318%5 Sept →
inferno4–90.0423%5 Sept →
dust213–40.0240%5 Sept →
inferno7–90.0618%5 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0119%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.1012%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0218%4 Sept →
inferno9–5-0.0319%4 Sept →
ancient11–130.0422%2 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0242%1 Sept →
anubis13–110.0419%25 Aug →
dust220–22-0.0131%25 Aug →
inferno13–60.0523%24 Aug →
dust29–130.0335%24 Aug →
inferno9–50.0645%24 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.0821%24 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0432%24 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.0619%24 Aug →
inferno6–9-0.0717%24 Aug →
dust29–1-0.046%22 Aug →
inferno16–130.0517%21 Aug →
inferno9–40.1832%21 Aug →
inferno9–50.1020%21 Aug →
ancient13–160.0122%20 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.0617%20 Aug →
inferno13–00.0916%3 Aug →
inferno13–40.0724%30 Jul →
dust213–70.0824%30 Jul →
nuke13–1-0.0418%30 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0317%29 Jul →
mirage13–3-0.0316%29 Jul →
ancient13–90.0425%29 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0214%28 Jul →
mirage9–130.0529%28 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0127%28 Jul →
overpass9–70.0715%28 Jul →
inferno8–80.0125%28 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0424%27 Jul →
inferno16–130.0522%27 Jul →
inferno2–9-0.0438%27 Jul →
inferno6–9-0.1727%27 Jul →
mirage13–60.1233%26 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0415%26 Jul →
cache13–00.1424%24 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0515%24 Jul →
mirage13–60.1021%24 Jul →
ancient2–7-0.0617%24 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0328%22 Jul →
dust213–100.0124%21 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0629%27 Jan →
overpass13–50.0634%27 Jan →
anubis13–40.0317%25 Jan →
dust210–13-0.0622%25 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.0510%25 Jan →
nuke15–15-0.0130%21 Dec →
inferno9–130.0525%21 Dec →
dust213–80.0531%21 Dec →
inferno13–11-0.0117%21 Dec →
overpass15–15-0.0325%21 Dec →
dust211–130.0523%19 Dec →
train13–9-0.0118%19 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0228%19 Dec →
dust213–50.0824%19 Dec →
nuke13–100.0124%19 Dec →
anubis13–10-0.0317%13 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0022%10 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.0113%10 Jun →
inferno13–70.0925%10 Jun →
ancient17–190.0424%26 May →
dust27–130.0024%23 May →
inferno16–130.0124%21 May →
nuke5–130.0320%21 May →
inferno13–50.0535%21 May →
dust219–160.0532%20 May →
nuke13–70.0540%18 May →
anubis8–130.0319%24 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0532%23 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0319%23 Apr →
inferno11–130.0425%22 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0434%28 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0327%28 Feb →
dust213–110.0423%28 Feb →
anubis13–110.0031%27 Feb →
dust213–110.0323%27 Feb →
inferno9–130.0122%27 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0213%18 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0416%18 Feb →
anubis13–90.0014%18 Feb →
inferno19–160.0317%17 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0518%16 Feb →
nuke13–80.0618%15 Feb →
inferno11–130.0122%15 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0014%15 Feb →
dust23–13-0.0619%15 Feb →
nuke13–90.0425%14 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →