lehmanski — CS2 Stats

SE76561197975429079[U:1:15163351]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,698Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating23,934Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8364 of 48187 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,380 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning76

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60–40Last 10060%Win rateWWLWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.7

Aggression10.0

Utility5.7

Positioning7.6

Opening Duels7.1

Clutch1.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 48% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning7.6

Utility5.7

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels7.1

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time443ms−35ms

first ⅓ avg 479ms → last ⅓ avg 443ms

Headshot accuracy17.2%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–3

13–1Biggest win — anubis

10Longest win streak

W2Current streak

14–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 21nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	24	16–8	67%	0.00
ancient	S	21	15–6	71%	0.04
inferno	S	18	12–6	67%	0.02
anubis	A	15	9–6	60%	0.03
nuke	D	10	3–7	30%	0.01
mirage	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
cache	—	2	2–0	100%	0.03
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,121Matches

53%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

87.4ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	144	56%	1.12	15.9
Mirage	133	47%	1.01	15.2
Ancient	124	52%	1.18	17.4
Inferno	105	56%	1.16	16.5
Nuke	73	58%	1.11	16.3
Dust2	59	53%	1.13	17.6
Vertigo	54	44%	1.04	16.0
Overpass	31	58%	0.92	14.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy

35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

77.9%Counter-strafing

7.2°Preaim

442msReaction time

47.9%T opening success

69.0%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

7.3%Flash assists

7.89HE damage / grenade

7.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4937 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	19–17	-0.02	14%	27 Aug →
ancient	19–16	0.10	21%	27 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	20%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.02	26%	27 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	14%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.08	21%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	7%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.00	12%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	19%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.06	16%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	12%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.04	33%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.02	8%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	15%	24 Aug →
anubis	12–16	0.01	18%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.08	12%	22 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.09	15%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	11%	22 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	12%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.11	17%	21 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	19%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.07	15%	21 Aug →
ancient	17–19	0.03	23%	20 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	11%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.05	21%	17 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–19	0.02	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	18%	16 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.02	31%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	9%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.07	22%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	21%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	21%	9 Aug →
inferno	19–16	0.01	20%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	20%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.09	20%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–1	0.11	16%	6 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	19–17	0.04	17%	6 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.06	21%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	14%	3 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.00	27%	3 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.00	33%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	20%	1 Aug →
inferno	10–1	0.09	38%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	6%	30 Jul →
nuke	17–19	0.02	16%	28 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.04	22%	28 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.00	12%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.00	23%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.06	19%	23 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.10	19%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.04	22%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.08	13%	22 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	7%	22 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.07	23%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	31%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	20%	20 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	18%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	20%	16 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.03	22%	16 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	18%	7 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	19%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	17%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.07	31%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	25%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	14%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	19%	5 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.02	20%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.02	17%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.08	23%	5 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	15%	5 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	18%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.05	8%	29 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.04	28%	29 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.01	36%	29 Jun →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	12%	28 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	19%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.01	5%	28 Jun →
overpass	11–13	-0.05	15%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.07	18%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.02	17%	27 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	7%	26 Jun →
inferno	12–16	-0.01	19%	26 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.00	14%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.02	17%	25 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.04	13%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.03	15%	25 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.03	21%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.02	5%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.15	11%	24 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	14%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.03	17%	24 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	11%	24 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	18%	24 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.02	15%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	11%	23 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	13%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	24%	23 Jun →