Flanne

Flanne — CS2 Stats

DK76561197971032930[U:1:10767202]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,522Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,249Purple band · top ~23.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 59 days played since 1 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,249 -1,654 1 Nov14 Sept · 34 days played
14,06619,706peak 19,7061 Nov14 Sept
19,706Peak Premier in tracked matches
59Days played since 2025-11-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,457 below peak (19,706)
  • -2,865 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,751 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFlanneFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,249 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning51
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41527Last 10041%Win rateLLLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −87ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time581ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 12 Mar
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · inferno, 12 Apr
359msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · train, 13 Nov
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 20 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 19anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC30131743%0.00
ancientA1912763%0.02
nukeD1861233%0.01
overpassB126650%-0.01
anubisD113827%0.01
cache41325%0.01
dust23030%-0.03
mirage2020%-0.04
train1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

372Matches
53%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo650%1.9117.5
Overpass450%1.0915.3
Ancient333%1.0918.0
Nuke367%1.7716.7
Mirage10%0.356.0
Anubis1100%0.556.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
581msReaction time
21.3%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
7.67HE damage / grenade
10.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7473% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.3416% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0711%14 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0314%14 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0217%13 Sept
inferno13–110.0514%11 Sept
ancient13–8-0.016%27 Aug
inferno8–130.0325%27 Aug
inferno13–110.038%23 Aug
cache13–100.0316%20 Aug
ancient13–11-0.047%20 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0227%16 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0513%16 Aug
cache13–16-0.0416%16 Aug
inferno13–70.0513%9 Aug
ancient13–70.047%4 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0220%3 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0127%3 Aug
cache15–150.0411%3 Aug
nuke16–140.0819%3 Aug
anubis6–130.0314%31 Jul
ancient9–130.0814%31 Jul
inferno13–110.0113%31 Jul
dust27–13-0.0211%31 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0113%20 Jul
anubis12–16-0.0418%20 Jul
inferno10–2-0.0017%5 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0113%5 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0317%4 Jul
nuke13–90.0410%20 Jun
anubis13–00.0329%20 Jun
inferno5–130.0011%20 Jun
inferno9–130.0117%16 Jun
overpass13–7-0.038%7 Jun
overpass15–150.0318%4 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0517%4 Jun
ancient13–60.1011%27 May
inferno15–150.0218%26 May
ancient8–13-0.039%20 May
ancient7–13-0.026%12 May
nuke13–80.059%5 May
cache5–130.0218%29 Apr
ancient13–100.0215%23 Apr
anubis7–130.0414%23 Apr
ancient13–160.0016%22 Apr
inferno13–20.0133%12 Apr
ancient13–60.0013%12 Apr
ancient12–16-0.0723%10 Apr
overpass13–10-0.117%10 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0317%6 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0528%6 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0219%30 Mar
dust29–13-0.0414%25 Mar
anubis9–130.0314%21 Mar
ancient13–100.009%12 Mar
nuke13–20.1219%12 Mar
inferno12–0-0.067%10 Mar
overpass13–90.015%7 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0116%5 Mar
inferno9–13-0.026%5 Mar
inferno13–50.0423%3 Mar
ancient10–30.0315%27 Feb
overpass15–150.029%12 Feb
nuke0–13-0.058%10 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0610%6 Feb
anubis13–100.0316%5 Feb
anubis13–50.0728%5 Feb
nuke9–130.0018%5 Feb
overpass13–80.0022%25 Jan
nuke13–110.0811%18 Jan
inferno8–130.0217%16 Jan
ancient13–60.0818%16 Jan
inferno8–130.0318%15 Jan
nuke4–13-0.0517%15 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0323%13 Jan
inferno13–100.0014%13 Jan
overpass6–13-0.007%7 Jan
dust211–13-0.0315%4 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0314%25 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0720%18 Dec
overpass6–13-0.0210%18 Dec
inferno10–13-0.0316%18 Dec
ancient13–4-0.0017%11 Dec
inferno9–13-0.048%11 Dec
ancient13–30.1126%11 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0117%9 Dec
inferno11–130.0423%4 Dec
nuke7–13-0.0322%4 Dec
nuke10–130.0716%1 Dec
inferno5–13-0.0213%15 Nov
nuke16–13-0.0126%15 Nov
ancient13–90.0617%15 Nov
inferno10–13-0.0112%15 Nov
nuke15–150.0213%13 Nov
train1–13-0.0817%13 Nov
mirage4–13-0.0512%13 Nov
overpass13–80.0616%13 Nov
inferno15–150.0315%10 Nov
overpass6–130.0029%10 Nov
ancient11–13-0.015%1 Nov
nuke10–130.0027%1 Nov
inferno5–130.0127%1 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →