tasku

tasku — CS2 Stats

FI76561197968942262[U:1:8676534]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,882Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,882 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 30 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,198 +597 30 Jan3 Jun · 28 days played
27,42829,999peak 29,99930 Jan3 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,450 +0 1 Sept20 Sept · 2 observations
2,4502,450peak 2,4501 Sept20 Sept
29,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,450Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-01-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,450
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 50 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtaskuPEAK ELO2,450csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4258Last 10042%Win rateWLLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time571ms+58ms
first ⅓ avg 513ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 6–7 · mirage, 4 May
60%Best headshot accuracy · 0–3 · ancient, 11 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 30 Mar
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 4 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 8overpassWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB22111150%-0.00
cacheB22101245%0.02
mirageD1651131%0.01
anubisB126650%0.02
nukeA85363%-0.02
overpassD81713%-0.03
dust2D61517%-0.01
vertigo32167%0.00
inferno2020%-0.05
train110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,010Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
79.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient19253%1.0316.2
Anubis17849%1.0616.4
Mirage15841%0.9515.6
Dust211547%0.9715.7
Nuke9657%1.0917.7
Overpass3063%1.1516.6
Cache2374%1.2518.0
Train2264%1.1516.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
579msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
52.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.44HE damage / grenade
11.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6717% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–140.0523%11 Sept
ancient0–30.0160%11 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0516%11 Sept
cache11–130.0313%11 Sept
anubis13–10.0521%4 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0230%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0511%15 Aug
ancient13–30.1017%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0519%9 Jul
dust210–13-0.0318%9 Jul
overpass13–40.0524%26 Jun
dust213–80.0134%25 Jun
cache9–130.0522%25 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0115%24 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0722%24 Jun
mirage13–40.0338%24 Jun
vertigo13–90.0313%24 Jun
cache12–00.0736%24 Jun
cache13–9-0.0432%16 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0516%3 Jun
mirage11–130.0329%29 May
ancient7–130.0020%29 May
cache9–13-0.0224%28 May
ancient13–80.0216%28 May
anubis7–13-0.0324%27 May
inferno0–13-0.0535%23 May
mirage6–130.0534%21 May
cache10–130.0325%21 May
mirage7–13-0.0117%21 May
ancient9–13-0.0518%21 May
anubis13–10-0.0315%21 May
overpass3–13-0.1422%20 May
dust25–13-0.0019%20 May
cache13–110.0623%19 May
cache3–13-0.067%19 May
ancient11–30.0626%19 May
cache13–30.1220%19 May
overpass9–13-0.0117%18 May
cache11–13-0.0220%18 May
cache13–60.0527%18 May
mirage11–13-0.0620%18 May
cache9–130.0417%18 May
cache8–13-0.0519%18 May
cache5–13-0.0322%18 May
cache7–13-0.0622%15 May
cache13–50.0821%13 May
vertigo2–13-0.0731%13 May
cache13–11-0.0222%13 May
mirage16–140.0224%11 May
ancient10–13-0.0427%11 May
cache9–13-0.0217%9 May
ancient13–4-0.0124%9 May
nuke13–6-0.0543%9 May
overpass10–130.0335%7 May
mirage6–70.1421%4 May
ancient13–90.0517%4 May
ancient13–110.0523%30 Apr
cache13–10-0.0131%30 Apr
nuke13–60.0317%30 Apr
cache13–60.0327%30 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0917%30 Apr
cache13–60.1124%26 Apr
cache11–130.0033%26 Apr
anubis9–130.0128%25 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0432%22 Apr
overpass4–13-0.1027%22 Apr
ancient13–70.0721%22 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0517%21 Apr
mirage6–130.0316%21 Apr
train13–60.0033%11 Apr
anubis13–30.0726%11 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0523%10 Apr
vertigo13–100.0623%10 Apr
anubis14–160.0325%8 Apr
nuke16–130.0523%2 Apr
mirage10–130.0427%2 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0515%2 Apr
anubis13–20.0820%30 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0222%30 Mar
ancient7–13-0.086%30 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0720%29 Mar
mirage13–100.0527%24 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0125%24 Mar
overpass8–130.0416%19 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0313%17 Mar
mirage13–60.009%12 Mar
anubis19–220.0521%6 Mar
ancient9–130.0129%27 Feb
dust22–13-0.0410%27 Feb
dust26–130.0439%27 Feb
ancient13–60.0142%27 Feb
ancient1–5-0.060%25 Feb
mirage13–20.0748%25 Feb
anubis13–90.0920%23 Feb
overpass3–13-0.0527%13 Feb
mirage0–4-0.070%12 Feb
ancient13–60.0324%12 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0717%9 Feb
ancient16–140.0022%7 Feb
dust213–16-0.0329%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →