PäLVi_kiNkku

PäLVi_kiNkku — CS2 Stats

FI76561197968677906[U:1:8412178]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,910Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,638Top 25% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#42469 of 224056 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,279 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,910 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 26 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,638 -807 26 Nov6 Sept · 40 days played
22,63826,535peak 26,53526 Nov6 Sept
26,650Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,279Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2025-11-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,279
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 221 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,897 below peak (26,535)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,362 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPäLVi_kiNkkuFACEITLevel 10 · 2,279 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,638 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,279csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning54
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57421Last 10057%Win rateWWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.4
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time591ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 7–1 · dust2, 24 Dec
54%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 26 Jan
344msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · anubis, 16 Feb
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 10 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W3Current streak
144In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 48% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB23111248%-0.01
dust2S2114767%0.01
nukeB168850%0.01
mirageA148657%-0.01
infernoB137654%-0.02
overpassA53260%-0.02
trainS54180%0.00
anubis32167%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,744Matches
53%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
74.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke26664%1.1115.8
Ancient23750%1.0015.8
Inferno17349%0.9614.6
Anubis16551%1.0115.9
Mirage12145%0.9615.7
Dust28442%0.8312.9
Train6653%0.9413.9
Overpass4949%0.9814.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
597msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
11.92HE damage / grenade
8.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.804% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0225%18 Apr
overpass13–110.0516%3 Apr
ancient13–110.0324%28 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0220%26 Mar
dust213–160.0231%24 Mar
dust213–8-0.0246%22 Mar
ancient12–16-0.0124%21 Mar
ancient7–130.0220%21 Mar
ancient13–10.0740%21 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0235%21 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0441%20 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0418%9 Mar
nuke13–60.0326%8 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0321%7 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0313%6 Mar
dust27–13-0.0217%28 Feb
ancient2–13-0.1016%28 Feb
overpass16–14-0.0320%27 Feb
dust213–9-0.0425%27 Feb
ancient5–2-0.0130%26 Feb
dust23–13-0.0515%25 Feb
nuke12–16-0.0223%21 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0229%18 Feb
nuke5–130.0125%18 Feb
dust20–12-0.069%18 Feb
ancient13–3-0.0417%16 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0420%16 Feb
mirage1–13-0.040%7 Feb
dust213–110.0222%7 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0712%7 Feb
dust213–60.0632%5 Feb
dust22–13-0.0520%5 Feb
inferno5–13-0.1038%5 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0322%4 Feb
anubis16–140.0117%4 Feb
ancient14–16-0.0032%4 Feb
mirage13–60.0635%2 Feb
dust213–30.0622%2 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0634%29 Jan
anubis13–3-0.0623%29 Jan
dust210–13-0.0427%29 Jan
dust213–40.0253%27 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0424%27 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0130%27 Jan
mirage13–6-0.0454%26 Jan
nuke13–20.0424%26 Jan
ancient13–40.0225%25 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0914%25 Jan
nuke13–100.0126%23 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0619%22 Jan
dust216–120.0835%22 Jan
inferno13–110.0424%22 Jan
mirage9–12-0.0313%17 Jan
train7–13-0.0126%16 Jan
dust213–80.0132%16 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0619%16 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0810%16 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0444%14 Jan
ancient2–5-0.0429%14 Jan
nuke13–00.0719%10 Jan
ancient13–5-0.0218%7 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0725%7 Jan
inferno13–90.0819%5 Jan
nuke13–110.0025%5 Jan
nuke10–130.0320%5 Jan
dust213–80.0339%5 Jan
dust213–5-0.0132%5 Jan
train13–60.0531%4 Jan
inferno13–80.0438%3 Jan
nuke13–00.0840%2 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0326%1 Jan
dust216–130.0228%1 Jan
inferno16–140.0714%31 Dec
ancient13–20.0621%30 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0726%30 Dec
overpass13–10-0.0029%30 Dec
mirage13–90.0529%30 Dec
train13–110.0024%27 Dec
nuke19–160.0127%26 Dec
train13–11-0.0426%26 Dec
mirage7–130.0323%26 Dec
nuke13–90.0136%25 Dec
ancient12–16-0.0123%24 Dec
dust27–10.1225%24 Dec
dust213–11-0.0134%20 Dec
ancient13–100.0220%18 Dec
mirage15–15-0.0022%16 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0118%16 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0218%13 Dec
mirage13–5-0.0712%11 Dec
train16–140.0131%11 Dec
nuke3–130.0242%9 Dec
ancient10–130.0229%4 Dec
ancient13–90.0626%3 Dec
dust213–110.0020%30 Nov
overpass3–13-0.088%27 Nov
mirage13–40.0123%27 Nov
ancient6–13-0.0221%27 Nov
dust211–13-0.0223%26 Nov
mirage13–40.0118%26 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →