craM シ

craM シ — CS2 Stats

76561197968040894[U:1:7775166]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

671Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,092Top 10% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11339 of 224334 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,826 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 13 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,092 -1,035 13 May16 Sept · 36 days played
24,85428,132peak 28,13213 May16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,826 +0 28 Aug15 Sept · 5 observations
1,8261,826peak 1,82628 Aug15 Sept
28,145Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,826Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,826
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 175 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,040 below peak (28,132)
  • +973 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,744 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,908 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcraM シFACEITLevel 9 · 1,826 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,092 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,826csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning65
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53443Last 10053%Win rateWWWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.8
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.5
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time538ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 21 Aug
48%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · dust2, 5 Jun
344msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 11 Jun
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 31 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 21dust2Weakest map · 39% over 38
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C38152339%-0.01
anubisS2114767%0.00
ancientA1811761%0.00
cacheB84450%0.01
infernoS64267%-0.03
overpassA53260%0.01
mirage220100%0.05
nuke2020%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 38). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

300Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
73.4ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23757%1.1015.2
Anubis1942%0.9715.1
Ancient1753%1.0315.4
Inferno838%1.0315.3
Overpass450%1.0012.0
Cache367%0.9214.0
Mirage367%0.7512.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
531msReaction time
43.5%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
6.67HE damage / grenade
11.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 38 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0521%17 Sept
anubis13–100.0216%17 Sept
dust213–40.0229%16 Sept
mirage13–50.0321%14 Sept
dust27–13-0.0529%26 Aug
dust213–20.0720%22 Aug
dust213–70.1337%21 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0228%20 Aug
dust210–13-0.0225%20 Aug
cache13–7-0.0220%20 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0325%18 Aug
dust213–100.0344%16 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0319%16 Aug
anubis13–30.0824%12 Aug
dust29–13-0.0335%12 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0433%12 Aug
ancient9–130.0314%12 Aug
anubis13–60.0312%12 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0015%12 Aug
cache14–16-0.0023%12 Aug
anubis8–130.0623%12 Aug
dust211–13-0.0722%11 Aug
dust211–13-0.0618%11 Aug
anubis7–130.0521%10 Aug
dust27–13-0.0130%10 Aug
dust210–130.0127%9 Aug
anubis13–100.0515%6 Aug
inferno15–150.0018%5 Aug
cache1–13-0.0627%3 Aug
dust213–6-0.0033%3 Aug
dust213–40.0521%3 Aug
dust28–130.0522%2 Aug
cache13–9-0.0111%31 Jul
ancient13–10.1136%31 Jul
anubis13–0-0.0217%31 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0021%31 Jul
cache11–130.0116%31 Jul
dust22–13-0.0532%29 Jul
ancient13–40.0119%29 Jul
cache13–16-0.0218%29 Jul
anubis13–40.1022%28 Jul
anubis3–13-0.107%28 Jul
dust24–130.0528%25 Jul
inferno13–60.0726%25 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0024%24 Jul
anubis9–130.0322%24 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0941%24 Jul
ancient13–10-0.066%23 Jul
dust216–13-0.0332%23 Jul
dust212–16-0.0625%22 Jul
dust25–13-0.0321%21 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0038%21 Jul
cache13–30.1132%21 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0024%21 Jul
dust213–8-0.0214%10 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0121%10 Jul
dust213–8-0.0229%10 Jul
dust216–140.0129%10 Jul
cache16–120.0326%10 Jul
anubis13–5-0.089%10 Jul
dust27–10.0233%4 Jul
dust215–150.0014%4 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0643%3 Jul
inferno13–2-0.0618%3 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0417%3 Jul
dust23–13-0.0841%3 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0428%3 Jul
overpass13–100.0123%3 Jul
dust213–9-0.0124%3 Jul
dust213–30.0520%15 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0811%11 Jun
dust29–130.0030%9 Jun
ancient13–60.0132%9 Jun
dust22–130.0448%5 Jun
dust25–13-0.0026%5 Jun
mirage13–10.0613%5 Jun
dust210–13-0.0220%4 Jun
anubis13–100.0012%1 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0611%1 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0320%1 Jun
dust213–100.0343%27 May
dust26–13-0.0743%22 May
overpass13–100.0119%22 May
dust211–13-0.0742%20 May
anubis13–110.0522%20 May
inferno13–7-0.0626%20 May
anubis1–13-0.0525%20 May
anubis15–150.0231%20 May
ancient13–80.0227%20 May
dust213–16-0.0138%19 May
ancient13–90.0322%19 May
ancient7–13-0.0028%19 May
dust213–7-0.0319%18 May
anubis13–6-0.0414%18 May
ancient13–110.0129%18 May
overpass13–80.0634%18 May
overpass11–13-0.0021%18 May
dust214–16-0.0228%16 May
dust26–13-0.0827%13 May
ancient13–80.0423%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →