RNCV — CS2 Stats

SE76561197968030893[U:1:7765165]Steam profile ↗

1,744Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.8 Developing

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning49

Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–52Last 10048%Win rateWWLWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression4.1

Utility6.9

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels1.5

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.9

Utility6.9

Mechanics3.7

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time535ms−71ms

first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms

Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.5%

first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–9

13–0Biggest win — vertigo

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	24	14–10	58%	0.00
cache	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.01
nuke	C	14	6–8	43%	0.00
vertigo	S	13	9–4	69%	0.00
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.01
dust2	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.04
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	0.00
overpass	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
mirage	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
train	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

206Matches

49%Win rate

0.98Avg K/D

69.4ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win

12%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	20	65%	1.01	12.7
Inferno	18	50%	1.05	11.9
Mirage	11	27%	0.76	11.8
Nuke	8	62%	1.14	13.8
Anubis	7	57%	1.08	16.4
Dust2	6	33%	0.56	8.5
Ancient	5	60%	0.90	13.8
Overpass	1	100%	1.19	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy

30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.1%Spray accuracy

66.8%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

519msReaction time

26.9%T opening success

45.3%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

9.2%Flash assists

14.10HE damage / grenade

11.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.8758% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–10	-0.05	11%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	14%	30 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.06	25%	30 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	26%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	8%	30 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.05	19%	29 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.01	14%	29 Aug →
overpass	5–13	-0.00	21%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.00	16%	29 Aug →
anubis	25–23	-0.03	12%	29 Aug →
vertigo	13–0	0.00	31%	29 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	8%	27 Aug →
nuke	17–19	0.02	20%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	15%	26 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	19%	25 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.02	25%	25 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.05	14%	24 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	12%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.03	16%	24 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.00	16%	24 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.01	26%	24 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	27%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	18%	22 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.03	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	12%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	17%	21 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.03	25%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	16%	21 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	12%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	15%	21 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.08	19%	21 Aug →
boulder	13–3	0.02	16%	21 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	23%	20 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	12%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	7%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.07	22%	20 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.04	18%	20 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	0.02	12%	20 Aug →
overpass	5–13	-0.04	18%	19 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	14%	19 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	20%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	31%	18 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.02	11%	18 Aug →
cache	20–22	-0.06	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	18%	17 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	16%	17 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.03	21%	17 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.02	11%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.14	26%	30 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	-0.01	20%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.01	12%	30 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.00	32%	30 Jul →
train	13–9	-0.03	20%	30 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	20%	27 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.09	18%	27 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.01	27%	27 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	-0.01	17%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	23%	27 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	17%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	15%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.07	3%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.00	21%	17 Jul →
vertigo	16–13	-0.04	15%	16 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	20%	16 Jul →
train	5–13	-0.06	17%	16 Jul →
overpass	13–6	-0.01	9%	16 Jul →
cache	19–15	-0.00	25%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	22%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	15%	14 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	23%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.11	19%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	15%	9 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	11%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	21%	8 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.04	17%	5 Jul →
overpass	9–13	-0.05	12%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.05	11%	5 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	33%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	11%	4 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	6%	4 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	-0.01	13%	4 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.11	23%	3 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	12%	3 Jul →
vertigo	13–6	0.10	22%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.05	14%	3 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	16%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	10%	3 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.02	9%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	15%	3 Jul →
vertigo	11–2	0.05	15%	3 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	13%	3 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.02	13%	3 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	14%	2 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	14%	2 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	17%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.05	20%	2 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	36%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.00	23%	1 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	6%	30 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.04	16%	30 Jun →