acidrain

acidrain — CS2 Stats

76561197965228051[U:1:4962323]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,173Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,958 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,958 → 1,958
+1Tracked matches · now 1,173
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 31 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,965 +1,440 31 Mar13 Jun · 21 days played
25,52527,652peak 27,65231 Mar13 Jun
27,845Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,958Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-03-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,958
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 43 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-16
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGacidrainFACEITLevel 10 · 1,958 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,958csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning47
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateLLTWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.4 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility7.9
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.0

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.7
Utility7.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time530ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 2 Apr
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · anubis, 9 May
328msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · nuke, 26 Apr
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 7 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 89% over 18ancientWeakest map · 15% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB25131252%0.02
ancientD2031715%0.01
nukeS1816289%0.05
anubisA149564%0.03
dust2D103730%0.03
mirageA85363%0.05
overpass32167%0.08
cache21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,111Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
82.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke6865%1.2315.7
Inferno6662%1.2516.0
Ancient4151%1.0916.4
Anubis3348%1.2517.2
Overpass2268%1.1818.1
Dust21958%1.3117.4
Mirage1753%1.4617.1
Cache1421%0.9215.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
529msReaction time
21.8%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
16.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.8102% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0615%2 Sept
dust210–13-0.0325%29 Aug
nuke15–150.0218%31 Jul
inferno13–80.0219%31 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0128%30 Jul
inferno8–130.0121%30 Jul
ancient13–110.0016%29 Jul
anubis3–130.0222%13 Jun
overpass13–100.0517%13 Jun
inferno13–40.0432%13 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0321%3 Jun
inferno15–150.0126%30 May
dust214–16-0.0726%30 May
nuke13–90.0123%30 May
inferno11–130.0625%26 May
ancient4–130.0827%25 May
anubis13–110.0520%25 May
ancient6–130.0310%23 May
nuke13–80.0615%17 May
inferno13–50.0024%17 May
ancient10–130.0426%17 May
inferno8–13-0.0226%17 May
mirage16–14-0.0017%9 May
nuke13–30.1915%9 May
anubis13–80.0136%9 May
inferno13–10-0.0220%8 May
cache13–90.0826%1 May
mirage3–130.0124%1 May
ancient7–13-0.0220%29 Apr
mirage13–100.0111%29 Apr
inferno6–130.0115%28 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0414%28 Apr
nuke13–70.0726%27 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0322%27 Apr
cache8–13-0.0428%26 Apr
nuke13–50.0317%26 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0020%26 Apr
mirage13–80.0822%24 Apr
inferno13–50.1119%22 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0019%18 Apr
nuke13–110.029%18 Apr
nuke13–60.0511%17 Apr
mirage13–60.0817%16 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0813%14 Apr
mirage13–40.1628%14 Apr
anubis13–90.0511%14 Apr
inferno13–70.0821%14 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0411%12 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0117%11 Apr
dust210–130.0323%11 Apr
anubis13–60.0122%11 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0419%11 Apr
inferno6–130.0220%10 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0019%10 Apr
dust216–130.0630%10 Apr
anubis13–60.0727%10 Apr
inferno13–110.0515%10 Apr
nuke13–40.039%10 Apr
overpass10–130.0410%10 Apr
inferno9–70.0225%10 Apr
ancient8–130.0213%9 Apr
overpass13–100.1524%9 Apr
ancient15–150.0814%9 Apr
inferno10–130.0226%9 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0415%9 Apr
dust214–160.1122%7 Apr
inferno13–160.0716%7 Apr
anubis13–00.1227%7 Apr
anubis11–130.0722%6 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0020%6 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0114%6 Apr
nuke19–22-0.0213%5 Apr
ancient11–130.0221%5 Apr
inferno8–130.0117%5 Apr
nuke13–90.0816%5 Apr
nuke13–50.0618%5 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0826%5 Apr
dust29–130.0219%4 Apr
inferno13–110.0710%4 Apr
dust213–90.0818%3 Apr
inferno13–100.0816%3 Apr
ancient11–13-0.026%3 Apr
nuke13–100.0514%3 Apr
ancient13–110.0522%3 Apr
dust27–130.0623%3 Apr
mirage15–150.0423%2 Apr
nuke13–50.1022%2 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0131%2 Apr
nuke13–50.1923%2 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0719%2 Apr
nuke13–40.0124%2 Apr
ancient11–130.0718%2 Apr
anubis13–90.1324%2 Apr
anubis13–70.0020%1 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0015%1 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0420%1 Apr
dust26–13-0.0318%1 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0022%31 Mar
dust213–80.0626%31 Mar
inferno13–60.0825%31 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →