raTTaTTaZONK

raTTaTTaZONK — CS2 Stats

DE76561197964930275[U:1:4664547]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

907Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,086 → 2,086
+11Tracked matches · now 907
0.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 59 days played since 27 Feb 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,512 -2,191 15 May9 Dec · 7 days played
19,51222,128peak 22,12815 May9 Dec
Faceit ELO: 2,086 +0 28 Aug29 Aug · 2 observations
2,0862,086peak 2,08628 Aug29 Aug
22,128Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,086Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
59Days played since 2025-02-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,086
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 414 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGraTTaTTaZONKPEAK ELO2,086csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning42
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40564Last 10040%Win rateLLLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility5.3
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time577ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 27 May
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 16 Oct
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · dust2, 28 Mar
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 21 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L4Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 10mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D39132633%-0.01
infernoC167944%-0.02
ancientC135838%0.00
mirageD113827%-0.03
anubisB105550%0.03
nukeB63350%-0.01
cache220100%0.04
overpass21150%-0.02
train110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

726Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
72.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis14054%0.9814.2
Dust212252%0.9214.3
Inferno11352%0.9114.1
Mirage9346%0.9114.1
Ancient7049%1.0014.0
Nuke3250%1.0514.9
Overpass1242%0.9113.6
Train1155%1.0213.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
72.2%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
586msReaction time
21.5%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
8.48HE damage / grenade
6.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.5033% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–130.0228%26 Aug
dust29–13-0.0717%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0127%2 Aug
dust29–13-0.0816%2 Aug
cache13–60.0316%2 Aug
ancient10–130.0120%26 Jul
dust22–13-0.0710%10 Jun
mirage5–13-0.068%10 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0418%7 Jun
inferno13–40.1112%27 May
anubis13–30.1019%21 May
dust216–120.0430%19 May
dust213–160.0214%11 May
mirage10–13-0.047%8 May
dust25–13-0.0312%7 May
cache13–60.0616%7 May
ancient13–50.0516%7 May
nuke8–8-0.0824%7 May
ancient13–90.0019%7 May
dust29–13-0.0523%7 May
dust214–16-0.0620%21 Apr
anubis13–80.0215%31 Jan
inferno13–70.0024%16 Jan
ancient13–160.0827%16 Jan
anubis13–90.1123%16 Jan
dust210–13-0.0018%29 Dec
nuke13–5-0.0322%9 Dec
mirage10–130.0115%9 Dec
dust27–13-0.0513%9 Dec
dust213–40.0116%9 Dec
dust210–13-0.0215%9 Dec
mirage13–80.0410%1 Dec
dust212–12-0.0725%1 Dec
mirage4–5-0.0213%25 Nov
dust213–10-0.0118%25 Nov
dust20–2-0.030%25 Nov
inferno6–13-0.0732%22 Nov
nuke10–130.0512%22 Nov
mirage13–6-0.0012%21 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0710%21 Nov
dust210–13-0.0427%20 Nov
ancient10–13-0.069%20 Nov
dust210–13-0.0512%12 Nov
nuke8–13-0.0120%9 Nov
train13–11-0.0315%29 Oct
dust213–4-0.0223%29 Oct
dust213–50.0236%16 Oct
dust25–12-0.0816%6 Oct
dust213–11-0.0228%6 Oct
ancient15–15-0.0016%6 Oct
ancient10–13-0.0321%30 Sept
dust213–90.0320%30 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0919%30 Sept
dust212–16-0.0222%29 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0413%23 Sept
dust24–100.0330%16 Sept
overpass13–11-0.0014%7 Aug
dust211–130.0325%6 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0312%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0317%6 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0516%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0817%30 Jul
nuke13–90.0425%21 Jul
dust213–110.0015%21 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0621%17 Jul
inferno13–90.0312%17 Jul
dust213–7-0.0112%17 Jul
ancient13–40.0515%17 Jul
inferno4–13-0.095%16 Jul
anubis13–50.0417%3 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0513%26 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0112%25 Jun
dust213–30.0427%23 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0014%20 Jun
dust213–40.0219%6 Jun
mirage5–7-0.050%6 Jun
dust28–130.0227%6 Jun
dust216–19-0.0227%2 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0219%22 May
ancient13–100.0519%15 May
inferno13–70.0211%15 May
dust23–13-0.0123%13 May
dust213–60.0419%30 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0118%13 Apr
anubis16–140.0119%31 Mar
dust215–15-0.0214%31 Mar
anubis8–130.0611%31 Mar
dust210–13-0.0225%31 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0511%30 Mar
dust213–80.0423%28 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0512%28 Mar
ancient5–13-0.029%27 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0511%27 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0415%25 Mar
anubis10–13-0.017%21 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0011%21 Mar
dust210–130.0214%21 Mar
anubis4–130.0017%6 Mar
inferno5–130.049%2 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0310%27 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →