gAuLeS

gAuLeS — CS2 Stats

PROContent CreatorBrazilRiflerSettings & gear profile →

BR76561197962302434[U:1:2036706]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

103Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+3Tracked matches · now 103
−6.7ppWin rate · 43.3% → 36.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,329 +3,325 10 Nov – 23 Sept · 14 days played
15,00418,790peak 18,79010 Nov23 Sept
18,895Peak Premier in tracked matches
58Days played since 2022-08-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgAuLeSFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning48
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–43Last 8952%Win rateLLLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 89 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.5
Utility3.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 5% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning4.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time644ms+72ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+5.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 89 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 16–13 · dust2, 19 Jan →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · train, 20 Nov →
375msFastest reaction time · 16–10 · nuke, 2 Jan →
16–2Biggest win · ancient, 6 Sept →

Across the last 89 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
55Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 15mirageWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC176–1135%-0.02
nukeS1511–473%-0.01
infernoB158–753%-0.01
dust2C146–843%-0.02
overpassB136–746%0.00
ancientA74–357%0.00
cache—21–150%-0.01
train—22–0100%0.04
vertigo—21–150%-0.06
anubis—21–150%0.01

Across the last 89 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
36%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
—ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$65,669Inventory value277ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Hand Wraps | Spruce DDPAT (Factory New)$1,854M4A1-S | Hot Rod (Factory New)$1,817★ Classic Knife | Crimson Web (Factory New)$1,754Souvenir M4A1-S | Knight (Factory New)$1,657Souvenir M4A1-S | Knight (Factory New)$1,657Souvenir M4A1-S | Imminent Danger (Minimal Wear)$1,636

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.8%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
639msReaction time
5.4%T opening success
60.0%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
10.62HE damage / grenade
5.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 5.4039% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–16-0.0324%2 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0118%2 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0122%2 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0516%10 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0123%29 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0838%29 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0215%14 Jul →
inferno13–40.0729%22 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0418%22 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.0719%8 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.055%25 Feb →
train13–60.0847%20 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0130%15 Jan →
mirage8–130.0133%22 Dec →
mirage13–16-0.0332%21 Dec →
overpass10–130.0317%8 Dec →
vertigo4–13-0.1018%8 Dec →
nuke13–10.0517%17 Nov →
anubis13–90.0414%15 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0120%13 Nov →
mirage13–16-0.0313%10 Nov →
inferno13–5-0.0313%29 Sept →
overpass13–30.0116%28 Sept →
nuke13–60.0410%25 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0017%19 Sept →
overpass9–13-0.0224%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0212%10 Sept →
overpass7–13-0.0114%8 Sept →
ancient13–60.0014%8 Sept →
nuke13–100.035%8 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.029%8 Sept →
overpass13–100.0422%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0410%8 Sept →
ancient16–2-0.018%6 Sept →
inferno16–6-0.0113%6 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0718%6 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0235%5 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0832%5 Sept →
overpass13–40.0523%1 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0616%31 Aug →
overpass22–200.0312%31 Aug →
dust216–90.0719%30 Aug →
mirage9–16-0.0011%30 Aug →
overpass9–16-0.0710%29 Aug →
dust219–16-0.0330%10 Aug →
inferno16–9-0.0119%10 Aug →
nuke15–19-0.0012%8 Aug →
train16–100.0115%3 Aug →
overpass7–16-0.0116%3 Aug →
mirage16–8-0.0412%24 Jul →
mirage16–5-0.009%24 Jul →
ancient16–120.0716%21 Jul →
inferno12–160.0316%21 Jul →
dust28–16-0.0314%21 Jul →
inferno2–16-0.0322%16 Jul →
nuke16–12-0.0519%16 Jul →
inferno19–160.0313%14 Jul →
nuke16–7-0.0029%14 Jul →
dust29–16-0.028%10 Jul →
dust216–19-0.0221%9 Jul →
overpass16–14-0.049%9 Jul →
mirage11–16-0.0411%8 Jul →
inferno19–17-0.0414%8 Jul →
nuke16–10-0.0516%3 Jul →
cache16–12-0.0116%3 Jul →
ancient9–16-0.0619%3 Jul →
mirage16–6-0.0329%30 Jun →
overpass8–16-0.0215%30 Jun →
inferno5–16-0.0815%30 Jun →
inferno16–2-0.008%22 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.039%22 Jun →
mirage17–19-0.0019%22 Jun →
dust28–16-0.0517%11 May →
nuke16–80.0620%10 May →
overpass16–60.0219%20 Jan →
dust216–130.0813%19 Jan →
nuke16–60.0511%11 Jan →
mirage16–14-0.0312%7 Jan →
ancient14–16-0.0113%5 Jan →
nuke16–10-0.0112%2 Jan →
nuke16–14-0.0014%1 Jan →
overpass15–19-0.0120%1 Jan →
ancient16–40.0414%30 Dec →
nuke16–7-0.0311%29 Dec →
dust212–16-0.0816%28 Dec →
mirage16–13-0.0320%27 Dec →
inferno16–110.0116%21 Dec →
dust216–110.0215%13 Sept →
dust216–120.0115%4 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.