pwder — CS2 Stats

76561197961683559[U:1:1417831]Steam profile ↗

3,570Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,241Pink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5233 of 13751 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,206 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning59

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLWWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5

Aggression5.7

Utility6.2

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.9

Utility6.2

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time520ms−52ms

first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms

Headshot accuracy19.8%−2.9%

first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–2

13–1Biggest win — cache

8Longest win streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 47% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	22	12–10	55%	0.01
cache	A	20	11–9	55%	0.01
nuke	B	16	8–8	50%	0.01
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.00
anubis	B	15	8–7	53%	0.01
inferno	S	8	6–2	75%	0.06
mirage	—	4	2–2	50%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,379Matches

53%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

79.7ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	330	48%	1.11	16.4
Nuke	315	50%	1.11	15.9
Ancient	306	53%	1.14	16.2
Dust2	267	53%	1.13	16.3
Inferno	137	53%	1.30	17.2
Train	72	61%	1.16	16.2
Overpass	59	59%	1.05	15.7
Cache	32	69%	1.10	15.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy

37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.1%Spray accuracy

83.1%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

521msReaction time

29.1%T opening success

56.8%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

10.79HE damage / grenade

12.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.0504% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	11–13	-0.06	23%	28 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.04	23%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.06	25%	28 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	25%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	24%	26 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	35%	26 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.08	16%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.06	17%	23 Aug →
cache	19–17	0.03	29%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	16%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	28%	18 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.10	25%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	22%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.07	21%	18 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.03	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	20%	16 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	8%	15 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	19%	15 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.00	23%	15 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	15%	14 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	21%	14 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.02	19%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.08	11%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.07	13%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.02	18%	13 Aug →
dust2	19–16	0.03	24%	12 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	14%	12 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.00	15%	12 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	14%	12 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.02	18%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.00	17%	11 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.03	18%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.02	13%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	26%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.06	17%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.01	27%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	28%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	19%	9 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.00	21%	9 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	14%	7 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	15%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.03	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	19%	7 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	14%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	28%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.08	21%	6 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	24%	6 Aug →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	21%	6 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.07	31%	6 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	18%	5 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	27%	5 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.02	23%	5 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	20%	5 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.00	25%	5 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.05	30%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	10%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.02	24%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.06	45%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.02	16%	31 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.06	21%	31 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.07	25%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	33%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.00	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	14%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.13	31%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.08	31%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	24%	23 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.05	12%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.05	21%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.06	19%	23 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.01	22%	23 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	42%	22 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.00	19%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.05	35%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.00	28%	21 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	33%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	23%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	17%	18 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.15	29%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	29%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	25%	17 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	14%	17 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.10	34%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	29%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.05	20%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.11	26%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	17%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.05	35%	15 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.06	21%	15 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	21%	14 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	19%	13 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	19%	13 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.04	14%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.06	8%	10 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	10%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	11%	10 Jul →