markmangoust — CS2 Stats

76561197960899073[U:1:633345]

202Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,146Purple band · top ~11.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4010 of 7918 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmarkmangoustFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,146 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning66
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62344Last 10062%Win rateLWWWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression8.9
Utility6.5
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch1.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.6
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−4.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — inferno 9–3
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
154In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 92% over 12anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A41241759%0.01
infernoB1910953%0.01
nukeS1411379%0.02
cacheS1211192%0.02
anubisD62433%-0.01
mirageS64267%-0.01
ancient2020%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

77Matches
58%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
82.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21567%1.0916.2
Cache956%1.2316.3
Nuke888%1.4619.0
Anubis333%1.2115.3
Inferno30%1.1217.0
Mirage2100%0.9415.0
Ancient10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
567msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
10.29HE damage / grenade
16.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.3031% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–130.0323%14 Aug
nuke13–110.0611%13 Aug
nuke13–80.0321%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0121%13 Aug
dust213–110.0817%13 Aug
anubis7–130.0115%12 Aug
cache13–10-0.0115%12 Aug
nuke13–100.0414%12 Aug
nuke13–40.0821%11 Aug
inferno4–130.0718%11 Aug
cache13–80.0221%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0418%11 Aug
cache13–60.017%11 Aug
dust213–9-0.0321%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.018%10 Aug
cache13–4-0.028%10 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0012%6 Aug
dust212–160.0718%6 Aug
dust213–100.005%6 Aug
dust213–90.0011%5 Aug
nuke13–20.0322%5 Aug
dust213–10-0.0116%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0215%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0212%4 Aug
cache16–140.0914%4 Aug
inferno9–4-0.0219%4 Aug
anubis8–13-0.037%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0215%3 Aug
cache13–110.0515%29 Jul
dust28–130.0121%29 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0715%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0423%28 Jul
nuke13–6-0.008%28 Jul
cache13–6-0.027%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0219%28 Jul
dust29–130.083%27 Jul
dust214–160.0516%27 Jul
inferno13–100.1517%27 Jul
dust23–130.0624%27 Jul
nuke9–130.0618%27 Jul
inferno11–130.025%27 Jul
dust23–13-0.0725%27 Jul
anubis13–90.1023%27 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0213%26 Jul
cache13–100.069%26 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0224%26 Jul
dust213–30.1323%26 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0317%26 Jul
dust28–130.0327%26 Jul
cache16–120.0322%16 Jul
dust213–70.0424%16 Jul
mirage16–140.0127%16 Jul
dust27–30.0016%16 Jul
mirage6–130.0225%16 Jul
dust213–110.0218%15 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0216%27 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0113%27 Jun
dust24–13-0.0613%27 Jun
dust213–11-0.0213%27 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0220%27 Jun
dust213–3-0.0113%27 Jun
nuke13–80.0212%27 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0412%27 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0520%27 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0414%27 Jun
cache13–70.0416%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.0923%26 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0219%26 Jun
dust213–8-0.0116%26 Jun
inferno13–80.0010%26 Jun
inferno13–40.0520%26 Jun
dust213–8-0.0216%26 Jun
dust213–9-0.0120%25 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0313%24 Jun
inferno9–0-0.0413%24 Jun
dust213–80.0024%24 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0129%24 Jun
dust20–13-0.0726%24 Jun
dust213–60.0923%21 Jun
dust213–70.0527%20 Jun
anubis6–130.0030%17 Jun
dust21–130.0035%12 Jun
inferno9–30.2730%11 Jun
nuke13–30.0120%10 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0622%9 Jun
dust213–7-0.0526%9 Jun
dust213–16-0.0118%5 Jun
inferno4–9-0.1410%2 Jun
inferno9–3-0.160%31 May
inferno2–9-0.1425%30 May
inferno9–00.1518%30 May
dust213–90.0217%22 May
dust213–70.0925%22 May
dust213–110.0617%22 May
inferno11–130.0414%22 May
dust213–50.0233%22 May
cache13–90.0414%13 May
dust212–120.0315%13 May
anubis16–12-0.078%12 May
dust213–60.0227%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →