markopoloo

markopoloo — CS2 Stats

FR76561197960899073[U:1:633345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

219Tracked matches67%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,923Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87347 of 223006 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 18,923 → 18,923
+4Tracked matches · now 219
0.0ppWin rate · 66.7% → 66.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 5 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,923 +8,212 5 Jun8 Sept · 15 days played
10,55919,474peak 19,4745 Jun8 Sept
19,589Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-06-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 551 below peak (19,474)
  • +7,844 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,077 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmarkopolooFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,923 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning64
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT61363Last 10061%Win rateWWWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.4
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.4
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time539ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 11 Jun
35%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 12 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · inferno, 27 Jun
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
154In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 85% over 13anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A41231856%0.01
nukeS1613381%0.03
infernoA159660%0.02
cacheS1311285%0.01
anubisD61517%0.00
mirageS64267%-0.01
ancient3030%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

91Matches
59%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
84.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22167%1.1215.9
Cache1250%1.2417.6
Nuke1090%1.6420.7
Anubis540%1.1619.0
Inferno425%0.9614.0
Mirage2100%0.9415.0
Ancient10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
538msReaction time
26.9%T opening success
55.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
11.84HE damage / grenade
15.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.9161% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0422%7 Sept
dust213–11-0.0217%7 Sept
cache13–10-0.0114%3 Sept
anubis14–160.0318%3 Sept
dust26–130.0316%3 Sept
nuke13–50.0823%3 Sept
dust213–20.0422%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0518%30 Aug
dust213–70.0119%30 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0510%30 Aug
dust27–13-0.0317%30 Aug
nuke16–120.0919%30 Aug
dust211–130.0323%14 Aug
cache1–13-0.119%14 Aug
nuke13–110.0611%13 Aug
nuke13–80.0321%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0121%13 Aug
dust213–110.0817%13 Aug
anubis7–130.0115%12 Aug
cache13–10-0.0115%12 Aug
nuke13–100.0414%12 Aug
nuke13–40.0821%11 Aug
inferno4–130.0718%11 Aug
cache13–80.0221%11 Aug
dust29–13-0.0418%11 Aug
cache13–60.017%11 Aug
dust213–9-0.0321%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.018%10 Aug
cache13–4-0.028%10 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0012%6 Aug
dust212–160.0718%6 Aug
dust213–100.005%6 Aug
dust213–90.0011%5 Aug
nuke13–20.0322%5 Aug
dust213–10-0.0116%5 Aug
dust29–13-0.0215%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0212%4 Aug
cache16–140.0914%4 Aug
inferno9–4-0.0219%4 Aug
anubis8–13-0.037%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0215%3 Aug
cache13–110.0515%29 Jul
dust28–130.0121%29 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0715%29 Jul
dust25–13-0.0423%28 Jul
nuke13–6-0.008%28 Jul
cache13–6-0.027%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0219%28 Jul
dust29–130.083%27 Jul
dust214–160.0516%27 Jul
inferno13–100.1517%27 Jul
dust23–130.0624%27 Jul
nuke9–130.0618%27 Jul
inferno11–130.025%27 Jul
dust23–13-0.0725%27 Jul
anubis13–90.1023%27 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0213%26 Jul
cache13–100.069%26 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0224%26 Jul
dust213–30.1323%26 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0317%26 Jul
dust28–130.0327%26 Jul
cache16–120.0322%16 Jul
dust213–70.0424%16 Jul
mirage16–140.0127%16 Jul
dust27–30.0016%16 Jul
mirage6–130.0225%16 Jul
dust213–110.0218%15 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0216%27 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0113%27 Jun
dust24–13-0.0613%27 Jun
dust213–11-0.0213%27 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0220%27 Jun
dust213–3-0.0113%27 Jun
nuke13–80.0212%27 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0412%27 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0520%27 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0414%27 Jun
cache13–70.0416%26 Jun
dust210–13-0.0923%26 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0219%26 Jun
dust213–8-0.0116%26 Jun
inferno13–80.0010%26 Jun
inferno13–40.0520%26 Jun
dust213–8-0.0216%26 Jun
dust213–9-0.0120%25 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0313%24 Jun
inferno9–0-0.0413%24 Jun
dust213–80.0024%24 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0129%24 Jun
dust20–13-0.0726%24 Jun
dust213–60.0923%21 Jun
dust213–70.0527%20 Jun
anubis6–130.0030%17 Jun
dust21–130.0035%12 Jun
inferno9–30.2730%11 Jun
nuke13–30.0120%10 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0622%9 Jun
dust213–7-0.0526%9 Jun
dust213–16-0.0118%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →