deReck🗧

deReck🗧 — CS2 Stats

76561197960837605[U:1:571877]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,657Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,061Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29461 of 238216 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,975 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,061 → 24,061
0Faceit ELO · 1,975 → 1,975
+6Tracked matches · now 1,657
0.0ppWin rate · 60.0% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 73 days played since 7 Apr 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

24,061Peak Premier on CSDB
1,975Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
73Days played since 2024-04-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,975
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 26 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,061
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 939 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdeReck🗧FACEITLevel 9 · 1,975 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,061 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,975csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning55
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5347Last 10053%Win rateWLWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +33ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility4.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.5
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time579ms+37ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 25 Jun
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · ancient, 11 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · overpass, 16 Sept
13–4Biggest win · anubis, 25 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
159In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 22infernoWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2214864%-0.01
infernoC1971237%-0.03
anubisB189950%-0.02
nukeA1610663%-0.02
dust2B158753%-0.01
vertigoA53260%-0.01
overpass42250%-0.03
mirage1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,334Matches
51%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
66.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust221649%0.8413.1
Ancient18354%0.8613.8
Anubis17749%0.8713.4
Inferno16456%0.9513.2
Nuke10957%0.9313.9
Mirage3424%0.8012.3
Overpass2941%0.9813.4
Vertigo1656%0.9114.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
579msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
51.6%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
7.65HE damage / grenade
6.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.5271% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis19–16-0.048%16 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0121%10 Aug
inferno13–90.0424%25 Jul
dust213–70.0722%25 Jun
anubis13–4-0.0317%25 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0215%25 Jun
dust213–70.0313%24 Jun
nuke16–120.0112%24 Jun
ancient8–130.0221%24 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0520%23 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0111%23 Jun
dust213–110.0111%23 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0132%11 Jun
dust213–9-0.0710%11 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0516%11 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0717%10 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0327%10 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0413%10 Jun
dust28–13-0.0310%10 Jun
inferno13–110.0319%10 May
inferno9–13-0.0917%5 Dec
inferno13–5-0.0013%2 Dec
inferno6–13-0.037%23 Nov
overpass7–13-0.0228%8 Nov
inferno10–13-0.0215%30 Oct
ancient13–110.0314%27 Oct
ancient22–190.0218%13 Oct
dust222–200.0418%3 Oct
ancient13–60.0224%2 Oct
ancient6–130.0011%21 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0916%18 Sept
overpass13–11-0.0615%16 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0322%10 Sept
overpass17–19-0.0316%29 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0121%25 Aug
inferno10–13-0.026%23 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0315%22 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0511%1 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0313%14 Jul
anubis14–160.0224%9 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0322%8 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0317%6 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0112%16 Jun
dust213–100.0115%7 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0111%2 Jun
nuke12–16-0.0517%14 May
dust213–11-0.0423%28 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0022%4 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0721%4 Feb
dust213–50.0221%2 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0212%6 Jan
dust28–13-0.077%3 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0513%22 Dec
nuke10–13-0.0216%27 Nov
anubis9–130.0118%26 Nov
nuke13–8-0.0010%21 Nov
inferno13–5-0.007%18 Nov
anubis13–90.0122%24 Oct
ancient14–16-0.0118%21 Oct
dust214–160.0523%20 Oct
inferno5–13-0.0211%15 Oct
dust26–13-0.0622%25 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0411%25 Sept
ancient13–80.0315%8 Sept
inferno6–13-0.1019%8 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0229%26 Aug
dust211–13-0.0318%29 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0918%5 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0114%5 Jul
dust28–13-0.0418%6 Jun
dust216–190.0222%2 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0528%30 May
vertigo11–13-0.0317%30 May
nuke13–4-0.0411%30 May
ancient9–13-0.0223%30 May
inferno5–13-0.0214%24 May
ancient13–9-0.0416%21 May
nuke13–110.0519%20 May
inferno8–13-0.0525%28 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0915%27 Apr
vertigo13–70.024%23 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0420%23 Apr
ancient19–170.0117%23 Apr
vertigo13–60.0126%22 Apr
anubis16–130.0222%22 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0313%21 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0020%21 Apr
nuke13–50.0131%21 Apr
overpass16–14-0.0113%21 Apr
ancient13–70.0018%18 Apr
anubis13–7-0.009%18 Apr
ancient12–160.0118%16 Apr
ancient13–100.0113%12 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0421%11 Apr
anubis16–13-0.0127%11 Apr
vertigo11–130.0020%10 Apr
nuke13–110.0115%10 Apr
inferno13–11-0.030%8 Apr
vertigo13–11-0.0515%7 Apr
ancient19–17-0.007%7 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →