CSMajor

CSMajor — CS2 Stats

76561197960661606[U:1:395878]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,439Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,121Top 50% of 188,431 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#73627 of 234037 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 962 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−339Premier CS Rating · 20,460 → 20,121
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 18 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,121 -1,536 2 Aug21 Sept · 17 days played
20,09421,682peak 21,6822 Aug21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 962 +0 1 Sept2 Sept · 2 observations
962962peak 9621 Sept2 Sept
21,682Peak Premier in tracked matches
962Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 962
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 89 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,561 below peak (21,682)
  • -965 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,879 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCSMajorFACEITLevel 7 · 962 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,121 · Pink bandPEAK ELO962csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning59
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50464Last 10050%Win rateLLLWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time549ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 31 Jul
37%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · cache, 16 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 22 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 11 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35161946%-0.01
ancientA2516964%-0.01
nukeA106460%0.00
cacheC83538%-0.02
infernoD82625%-0.03
anubisC73443%0.00
dust2S54180%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.11
poseidon1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches
55%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
68.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3754%0.9213.2
Ancient3269%1.0014.4
Nuke1362%0.9715.8
Anubis1136%0.8012.2
Cache450%1.0512.8
Vertigo20%0.8212.5
Inferno20%0.7212.0
Dust21100%2.0026.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
550msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
58.3%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
6.57HE damage / grenade
11.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7351% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.0913%21 Sept
anubis11–130.0415%21 Sept
mirage4–130.0214%21 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0119%20 Sept
anubis8–130.0118%17 Sept
anubis13–60.0818%17 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0424%17 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0319%14 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0522%11 Sept
nuke11–130.007%11 Sept
mirage9–130.0111%11 Sept
nuke13–60.0928%6 Sept
nuke16–130.0419%4 Sept
mirage8–130.0211%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0316%3 Sept
ancient13–60.1210%3 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0313%2 Sept
ancient19–15-0.0217%31 Aug
mirage13–100.0023%31 Aug
ancient17–190.0015%30 Aug
cache6–13-0.0113%30 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0517%28 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0110%28 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0111%28 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0316%28 Aug
cache7–13-0.0014%24 Aug
ancient7–130.0115%24 Aug
mirage9–130.0224%22 Aug
ancient13–20.1020%22 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0312%22 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0619%22 Aug
mirage15–15-0.028%21 Aug
mirage6–130.0420%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0817%19 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0515%19 Aug
ancient13–100.0118%18 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0135%18 Aug
dust213–11-0.0120%16 Aug
cache12–120.0537%16 Aug
inferno4–9-0.144%15 Aug
mirage3–130.0315%15 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0414%15 Aug
ancient13–80.0116%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.0225%15 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0611%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0220%13 Aug
mirage13–50.0518%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0214%13 Aug
vertigo1–13-0.115%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.064%11 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0214%11 Aug
inferno13–10.0713%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0322%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0919%10 Aug
dust213–70.029%10 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0117%7 Aug
ancient13–30.0218%6 Aug
mirage16–12-0.008%6 Aug
mirage16–130.0113%4 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0410%3 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0014%3 Aug
dust213–8-0.017%2 Aug
mirage13–6-0.044%2 Aug
cache13–10-0.0619%1 Aug
mirage2–13-0.080%1 Aug
cache2–11-0.0414%1 Aug
ancient13–10-0.019%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0714%1 Aug
nuke13–11-0.027%1 Aug
dust213–100.1411%31 Jul
ancient13–80.0130%31 Jul
mirage10–130.0314%31 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0110%30 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0124%30 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0612%30 Jul
mirage13–110.0118%28 Jul
nuke16–13-0.008%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0113%28 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0911%28 Jul
mirage11–130.0120%28 Jul
nuke7–130.013%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0117%27 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0118%27 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0121%26 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0518%26 Jul
nuke14–160.0018%26 Jul
cache9–13-0.0719%26 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0818%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0523%26 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0415%26 Jul
ancient13–60.0115%24 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0613%24 Jul
ancient13–11-0.066%22 Jul
mirage11–13-0.067%22 Jul
cache13–6-0.0211%22 Jul
mirage13–110.0811%21 Jul
poseidon8–80.0321%21 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0012%18 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0017%18 Jul
ancient13–4-0.019%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →