blz

blz — CS2 Stats

76561197960314913[U:1:49185]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,129Tracked matches53%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,879Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#52528 of 231865 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,560 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 15 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,879 -1,741 24 Jul18 Sept · 19 days played
20,82724,136peak 24,13624 Jul18 Sept
24,136Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,560Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-07-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,560
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 191 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,257 below peak (24,136)
  • -807 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,121 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGblzFACEITLevel 7 · 1,560 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,879 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,560csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning50
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLWWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +53ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim9.1
Utility5.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning5.0
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time500ms−99ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 500ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 24 Jul
59%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 10 Sept
328msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 10 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 25 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 13infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1981142%-0.01
cacheB189950%-0.01
ancientC146843%0.00
mirageA138562%0.03
infernoD134931%-0.02
anubisB126650%-0.02
nukeB115645%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

255Matches
51%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
82.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6144%1.2316.1
Ancient4161%1.2417.0
Dust23951%1.1616.7
Nuke3759%1.2016.9
Anubis2843%1.1317.0
Inferno2148%1.0916.2
Overpass1560%1.1616.9
Train1040%1.1617.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
41.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.7%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
495msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
10.08HE damage / grenade
13.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6361% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–130.0016%18 Sept
cache13–5-0.0119%18 Sept
cache13–4-0.0139%18 Sept
mirage7–13-0.079%15 Sept
mirage13–40.0121%15 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0615%15 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0218%15 Sept
dust210–13-0.0517%15 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0718%15 Sept
ancient10–130.0517%12 Sept
dust216–13-0.0412%12 Sept
dust213–20.0124%11 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0320%11 Sept
mirage13–60.0521%11 Sept
mirage13–50.059%11 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0123%11 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0420%10 Sept
dust213–100.0625%10 Sept
dust213–16-0.0111%10 Sept
mirage16–120.0420%10 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0718%10 Sept
dust213–4-0.0159%10 Sept
mirage13–50.1133%10 Sept
inferno14–160.0113%9 Sept
ancient13–70.0113%9 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0212%9 Sept
mirage13–60.0521%8 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0617%8 Sept
dust210–130.1123%4 Sept
dust27–13-0.0917%3 Sept
dust210–130.0221%3 Sept
cache13–110.0319%3 Sept
nuke13–80.0321%3 Sept
cache13–80.0213%3 Sept
inferno11–130.0119%3 Sept
ancient13–70.0211%3 Sept
dust213–40.0624%29 Aug
nuke2–130.0115%28 Aug
inferno7–130.0024%28 Aug
ancient8–10.095%28 Aug
cache8–13-0.0713%28 Aug
mirage7–130.1024%28 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0019%28 Aug
cache5–13-0.0621%28 Aug
dust28–13-0.0513%28 Aug
ancient13–90.0525%28 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0215%28 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0223%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0419%28 Aug
inferno0–12-0.0714%28 Aug
cache2–13-0.0531%28 Aug
anubis13–10.0128%25 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0517%25 Aug
mirage13–40.0720%25 Aug
inferno13–100.0121%25 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0117%25 Aug
ancient15–150.0125%25 Aug
anubis13–70.0218%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.0717%22 Aug
ancient9–130.0119%22 Aug
dust214–16-0.0331%22 Aug
inferno15–150.0422%22 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0621%22 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0610%22 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0324%22 Aug
nuke13–9-0.026%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0816%22 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0714%22 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0612%22 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0113%17 Aug
dust213–100.0122%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0424%8 Aug
inferno5–13-0.1225%7 Aug
cache13–100.0118%7 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0020%2 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0416%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.0022%27 Jul
cache13–9-0.0415%27 Jul
anubis8–13-0.048%27 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0410%27 Jul
cache13–20.1728%24 Jul
dust213–90.0320%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.104%24 Jul
cache7–13-0.0713%24 Jul
dust213–8-0.0114%24 Jul
inferno13–50.0124%24 Jul
cache2–13-0.0720%23 Jul
cache13–11-0.0312%23 Jul
nuke13–40.0819%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0124%16 Jul
nuke16–140.0423%16 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0117%16 Jul
ancient0–2-0.030%16 Jul
nuke3–13-0.1121%16 Jul
cache9–130.0023%16 Jul
ancient4–130.0919%16 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0213%16 Jul
cache14–160.0118%16 Jul
anubis11–130.0511%15 Jul
cache13–100.0818%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →