Tazo FBR

Tazo FBR — CS2 Stats

CH76561197960310944[U:1:45216]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,575Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,575 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 16 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,139 -921 16 Mar24 Jun · 20 days played
20,73122,410peak 22,41016 Mar24 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,867 +0 1 Sept19 Sept · 3 observations
1,8671,867peak 1,8671 Sept19 Sept
22,418Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,867Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-03-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,867
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 134 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTazo FBRPEAK ELO1,867csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning67
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41545Last 10041%Win rateLTWLTLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −74ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 122 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 7103 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility6.2
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.7
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time627ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy25.4%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 20 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · vertigo, 16 May
469msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 1 Sept
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 12 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 27% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2261627%-0.01
dust2B1991047%-0.01
anubisB179853%0.00
nukeD134931%0.00
ancientD72529%-0.01
cacheA74357%-0.01
overpassS75271%0.01
mirageC52340%0.02
train2020%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,087Matches
49%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
82.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno27548%1.0416.8
Anubis25352%1.1017.2
Dust220948%1.0516.9
Ancient15948%1.1117.5
Mirage15339%1.0516.5
Nuke11353%1.0617.0
Overpass5262%1.1017.0
Train2627%1.0716.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
632msReaction time
42.6%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
9.55HE damage / grenade
14.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0630%12 Sept
inferno15–150.0020%12 Sept
mirage13–80.0439%12 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0324%11 Sept
ancient15–150.0114%11 Sept
cache5–13-0.0326%11 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0313%5 Sept
inferno13–70.0532%5 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0018%1 Sept
cache13–100.0126%5 Aug
inferno3–130.0118%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0635%2 Aug
cache13–8-0.0143%2 Aug
anubis13–100.0414%25 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0338%9 Jul
dust223–250.0320%26 Jun
inferno5–13-0.080%24 Jun
overpass15–150.0122%24 Jun
dust211–130.0231%23 Jun
dust27–13-0.0221%15 Jun
nuke11–130.0723%15 Jun
overpass13–100.0624%11 Jun
inferno6–130.0222%11 Jun
nuke13–110.0341%8 Jun
anubis13–70.0631%8 Jun
dust26–13-0.0817%22 May
anubis13–7-0.0220%22 May
nuke13–9-0.0327%20 May
inferno13–60.1332%20 May
nuke10–130.0121%19 May
inferno13–30.0331%19 May
vertigo6–9-0.0350%16 May
inferno10–13-0.0614%13 May
overpass13–11-0.0220%13 May
overpass13–10.0133%12 May
nuke9–13-0.0424%12 May
inferno7–13-0.0112%11 May
dust25–13-0.1123%11 May
overpass3–13-0.0813%11 May
inferno10–130.0227%10 May
inferno13–70.0641%9 May
dust213–90.0535%8 May
dust213–7-0.0130%7 May
overpass13–90.0022%6 May
mirage4–13-0.0124%5 May
anubis3–13-0.0623%3 May
inferno13–50.0025%3 May
cache13–40.0418%1 May
cache13–70.0223%30 Apr
cache7–13-0.0739%30 Apr
overpass13–40.0827%29 Apr
dust29–13-0.0122%29 Apr
dust213–70.0829%29 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0635%28 Apr
dust29–13-0.0847%28 Apr
dust213–9-0.0120%28 Apr
train12–12-0.0126%28 Apr
train11–130.0425%28 Apr
mirage10–130.0132%26 Apr
anubis13–100.1131%26 Apr
dust213–110.0229%26 Apr
anubis13–110.0633%26 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0323%23 Apr
anubis13–30.0833%23 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0710%23 Apr
cache10–13-0.0031%22 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0739%22 Apr
inferno8–130.0222%21 Apr
dust26–13-0.0128%21 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0738%21 Apr
dust219–150.0017%20 Apr
nuke6–130.0338%18 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0526%17 Apr
inferno13–2-0.0119%17 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0216%17 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0330%16 Apr
nuke14–16-0.0125%15 Apr
ancient13–70.0319%14 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0420%12 Apr
ancient7–130.0019%12 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0118%11 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0836%11 Apr
dust213–16-0.0019%4 Apr
anubis12–120.0324%4 Apr
nuke13–10.0110%2 Apr
anubis22–19-0.0224%1 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0622%31 Mar
anubis5–130.0233%29 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0541%29 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0224%27 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0310%27 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0315%27 Mar
dust213–2-0.0115%25 Mar
nuke2–13-0.0134%24 Mar
dust216–140.0120%23 Mar
ancient16–140.0523%22 Mar
nuke13–100.0425%22 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0325%21 Mar
dust213–11-0.0323%21 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0028%16 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →