LNZ vs ScrunK — CS2 Settings Comparison
Compare more: every pro player, team rankings, sensitivity converter and crosshair codes.
| Setting | LNZ | ScrunK |
|---|---|---|
| Team | MIBR | Retired |
| Role | IGL | IGL |
| DPI | 400 | 800 |
| In-Game Sens | 1.7 | 0.85 |
| eDPI | 680 | 680 |
| Zoom Sens | 1 | 1 |
| Resolution | 1024x768 | 1280x1024 |
| Aspect Ratio | 4:3 | 5:4 |
| Stretch | Stretched | Stretched |
| Crosshair Code | CSGO-az5N5-OWZuB-dhJhY-8shTW-k8aYO | CSGO-SG3dU-Twu5q-SyeKs-CMDVv-JTDND |
| Mouse | ZOWIE EC2-DW Black | Corsair Sabre v2 Pro |
| Polling Rate | 1000Hz | 1000Hz |
| Mousepad | Razer Gigantus V2 Pro Control | VAXEE PE Black |
| Monitor | ZOWIE XL2546K | ZOWIE XL2546K |
| Keyboard | Wooting 80HE Ghost | Corsair MAKR Pro 75 |
| Headset | Logitech G PRO X 2 Headset Black | Corsair HS80 MAX |
Key Differences
- LNZ and ScrunK play at an identical 680 eDPI.
- They take different DPI approaches: LNZ at 400, ScrunK at 800.
- LNZ plays 1024x768 (4:3 Stretched); ScrunK plays 1280x1024 (5:4 Stretched).
- Their crosshairs match on colour (custom) and size (1).
- They share hardware: both use the ZOWIE XL2546K.
- ScrunK is retired — treat their settings as their last verified competitive setup.
Crosshair Comparison
Previews are representative, not pixel-exact — copy the code to see the real thing in-game.
How do you compare? Compare your setup with LNZ or with ScrunK.
Loadout Comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who has higher sensitivity — LNZ or ScrunK?
- LNZ plays at 680 eDPI while ScrunK plays at 680 eDPI. Both use the same eDPI. The pro average is 846 eDPI.
- Do LNZ and ScrunK use the same resolution?
- LNZ plays on 1024x768 (4:3 Stretched) while ScrunK plays on 1280x1024 (5:4 Stretched).
- What mouse does LNZ use vs ScrunK?
- LNZ uses the ZOWIE EC2-DW Black at 400 DPI, while ScrunK uses the Corsair Sabre v2 Pro at 800 DPI.