Daginal Vischarge

Daginal Vischarge — CS2 Stats

AU76561199565206535[U:1:1604940807]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

793Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,531Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning51
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48511Last 10048%Win rateTWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression4.7
Utility3.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.3

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.1
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time460ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 505ms → last ⅓ avg 460ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 30anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA30191163%0.02
dust2C1871139%0.01
ancientB157847%0.04
infernoC125742%0.03
nukeA116555%0.02
anubisD5050%-0.04
cache32167%0.08
overpass32167%0.01
vertigo2020%0.06
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

15,888Lifetime kills
1.42K/D · Top 10% of tracked players
823Matches
56.4%Match win rate · Top 5% of tracked players
42.6%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,427MVPs
310Hours (in match)
1,541Bombs planted
271Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,562dust2
1,220inferno
1,052nuke
647vertigo
404train
36italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
448msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
11.70HE damage / grenade
3.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3721 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7716% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–15-0.0227%27 Aug
inferno13–30.1314%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0226%18 Aug
cache13–40.1515%18 Aug
anubis2–10-0.0533%25 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0418%25 Jul
mirage13–8-0.039%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0714%24 Jul
cache1–130.0214%24 Jul
ancient9–130.0014%15 Jul
dust213–1-0.000%28 Jun
nuke13–70.033%28 Jun
overpass13–70.0419%27 Jun
inferno2–13-0.049%27 Jun
inferno2–130.0050%26 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0617%26 Jun
ancient6–13-0.059%30 May
dust29–130.068%28 May
mirage13–70.0716%28 May
anubis0–13-0.060%12 May
inferno8–130.0120%12 May
mirage13–8-0.0323%12 May
inferno13–70.0916%11 May
mirage7–13-0.0316%9 May
inferno8–13-0.0124%9 May
dust27–13-0.1011%6 May
mirage13–10-0.0417%6 May
mirage13–80.0316%6 May
mirage13–110.0011%6 May
inferno11–130.0520%6 May
ancient16–140.0722%6 May
dust29–13-0.0113%3 May
nuke7–13-0.0114%3 May
cache13–80.0726%3 May
ancient2–13-0.0316%2 May
dust26–13-0.017%2 May
dust210–13-0.0524%2 May
dust213–11-0.0110%1 May
nuke10–130.0010%1 May
mirage11–130.0411%1 May
overpass13–100.015%1 May
dust210–13-0.0419%1 May
dust29–130.0423%26 Apr
mirage13–60.0423%26 Apr
ancient13–90.049%25 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0113%25 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0519%24 Apr
mirage3–130.025%23 Apr
train0–8-0.0238%23 Apr
dust213–80.069%23 Apr
mirage6–130.0130%20 Apr
vertigo7–130.0614%20 Apr
nuke1–13-0.0118%19 Apr
mirage4–130.0334%19 Apr
nuke11–50.0214%19 Apr
inferno13–90.069%17 Apr
dust24–13-0.0523%17 Apr
ancient13–30.0726%17 Apr
mirage13–90.0519%17 Apr
inferno7–130.006%17 Apr
ancient13–110.0619%17 Apr
mirage16–140.009%16 Apr
ancient7–130.1226%13 Apr
mirage13–50.0513%13 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0123%13 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0614%13 Apr
mirage13–60.0626%10 Apr
mirage13–40.1142%10 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0121%9 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0320%9 Apr
ancient13–70.062%9 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0313%9 Apr
mirage10–130.0320%9 Apr
dust213–40.1325%6 Apr
nuke13–70.064%6 Apr
mirage13–10.085%6 Apr
mirage13–110.0614%6 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0110%2 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0115%2 Apr
dust213–100.0818%1 Apr
vertigo8–130.0618%31 Mar
dust210–130.0210%31 Mar
ancient13–90.0419%30 Mar
dust213–20.0310%30 Mar
ancient13–100.0713%30 Mar
dust213–9-0.029%30 Mar
dust28–130.0117%30 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0013%28 Mar
nuke4–130.0839%27 Mar
nuke13–100.0920%27 Mar
inferno13–90.0623%27 Mar
mirage13–50.0317%26 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0213%26 Mar
inferno13–60.0825%26 Mar
ancient6–130.1010%23 Mar
mirage13–8-0.035%20 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0411%20 Mar
mirage13–70.0911%20 Mar
dust26–130.0414%20 Mar
ancient10–130.066%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →