lehtine

lehtine — CS2 Stats

76561199190449627[U:1:1230183899]Steam profile ↗

809Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
741Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,186 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlehtineFACEITLevel 8 · 2,186 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning58
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression5.9
Utility5.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.4

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time668ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 668ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 9–7
131Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 13infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26141254%0.00
ancientB26121446%0.00
nukeA138562%-0.01
dust2C94544%0.00
trainB84450%0.00
infernoD72529%-0.01
overpassA74357%-0.00
cache2020%0.02
anubis220100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,645Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,149Matches
42.9%Match win rate
41.6%Headshot %
6.1%Shot accuracy
5,417MVPs
741Hours (in match)
2,419Bombs planted
934Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,720nuke
2,558inferno
1,152dust2
977vertigo
944train
136cbble
19ar_shoots
12office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

689Matches
50%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
82.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21150%1.2017.4
Ancient13650%1.0516.2
Nuke9553%1.2818.1
Inferno5956%1.2916.6
Train5450%0.9915.0
Overpass4154%1.0516.5
Dust23938%1.0416.2
Anubis3456%1.2917.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
89.6%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
675msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
8.36HE damage / grenade
5.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.8729% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10.0833%2 Aug
cache13–160.0417%25 Jul
mirage3–11-0.1019%25 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0643%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0616%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0324%21 Jul
inferno3–90.0535%20 Jul
dust213–110.0818%20 Jul
cache12–16-0.0019%5 Jul
anubis13–70.0516%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0626%5 Jul
mirage13–50.0525%5 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0124%3 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0418%28 Jun
anubis13–10.003%28 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0321%28 Jun
overpass11–130.0422%26 Jun
dust213–6-0.0513%26 Jun
dust29–130.0412%23 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0310%23 Jun
inferno7–130.0120%23 Jun
ancient13–60.0214%23 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0113%23 Jun
nuke6–13-0.065%23 Jun
mirage10–130.0214%22 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0225%22 Jun
mirage13–100.0211%22 Jun
ancient13–30.0720%22 Jun
inferno10–130.0018%21 Jun
ancient10–130.0118%21 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0516%21 Mar
ancient4–130.0210%15 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0621%15 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0227%15 Mar
dust29–13-0.0422%9 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0813%9 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0712%9 Mar
overpass13–90.0415%9 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0221%8 Mar
ancient4–130.0626%8 Mar
ancient19–16-0.0316%8 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0223%8 Mar
mirage12–16-0.0116%6 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0215%18 Jan
mirage13–70.0328%18 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0413%3 Jan
dust25–13-0.0610%3 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0315%3 Jan
mirage13–70.0311%2 Jan
ancient13–50.1017%2 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0523%2 Jan
dust27–13-0.0517%2 Jan
train22–19-0.0123%2 Jan
nuke13–4-0.027%1 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0117%1 Jan
mirage13–30.0718%1 Jan
nuke16–19-0.0015%29 Dec
train13–60.0120%29 Dec
dust213–50.067%29 Dec
ancient13–70.0412%28 Dec
mirage11–130.0414%28 Dec
inferno13–90.0117%28 Dec
overpass3–13-0.0521%28 Dec
nuke16–140.0622%26 Dec
overpass22–180.0511%25 Dec
overpass19–17-0.0415%25 Dec
mirage13–160.0113%25 Dec
dust27–13-0.044%18 Dec
train7–13-0.0618%18 Dec
ancient7–130.0111%17 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0419%17 Dec
nuke13–5-0.0318%17 Dec
nuke9–130.0118%13 Dec
train13–16-0.0311%13 Dec
ancient13–8-0.0517%13 Dec
ancient13–160.0122%12 Dec
train13–70.0412%11 Dec
ancient16–13-0.0217%11 Dec
ancient13–80.0314%11 Dec
ancient13–80.0311%9 Dec
mirage10–130.0019%8 Dec
ancient7–130.0122%6 Dec
nuke9–70.159%6 Dec
mirage9–130.0010%5 Dec
ancient9–130.0426%5 Dec
train13–90.0623%4 Dec
mirage13–90.0216%4 Dec
ancient10–130.003%3 Dec
ancient13–7-0.0410%3 Dec
nuke13–10-0.0117%3 Dec
mirage14–16-0.0310%3 Dec
mirage22–200.0024%2 Dec
train14–160.0115%2 Dec
overpass5–13-0.0416%1 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0218%1 Dec
overpass13–7-0.0118%1 Dec
mirage19–160.0323%1 Dec
ancient13–80.0521%30 Nov
mirage6–13-0.0515%30 Nov
train1–13-0.0228%29 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →