japanilainen liikemies — CS2 Stats

76561199127544350[U:1:1167278622]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,140Tracked matches69%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating8.1 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating22,902Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12743 of 57690 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,357 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning79

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.5

Aggression10.0

Utility6.2

Positioning7.9

Opening Duels7.6

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning7.9

Utility6.2

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels7.6

Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time605ms+10ms

first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms

Headshot accuracy23.0%−2.1%

first ⅓ avg 25.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–1Biggest win — nuke

9Longest win streak

L3Current streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 82% over 11ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	49	25–24	51%	0.04
vertigo	S	11	9–2	82%	0.06
ancient	D	11	3–8	27%	0.01
cache	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.01
nuke	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
dust2	S	6	4–2	67%	0.02
anubis	C	5	2–3	40%	0.05
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.16
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.19
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,828Matches

52%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

89.3ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	501	53%	1.23	18.6
Ancient	241	47%	1.12	17.4
Vertigo	151	52%	1.28	19.6
Nuke	108	52%	1.23	18.3
Dust2	99	44%	1.00	16.7
Inferno	69	42%	1.19	18.6
Anubis	64	53%	1.16	17.5
Overpass	39	46%	1.13	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy

40.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.7%Spray accuracy

82.5%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

596msReaction time

55.9%T opening success

65.1%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

8.8%Flash assists

8.02HE damage / grenade

12.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4802 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	5–13	0.00	16%	26 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	18%	25 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.02	31%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	16%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	14%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.03	12%	22 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	26%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	18%	21 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.01	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.14	21%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	20%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.02	18%	15 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.07	23%	15 Aug →
nuke	7–9	-0.07	11%	15 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	39%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.12	36%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.12	18%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.04	21%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.13	25%	14 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.08	21%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	21%	8 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.05	31%	8 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.06	18%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.16	36%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.19	29%	31 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	27%	24 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.09	25%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.11	21%	18 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.15	42%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	27%	17 Jul →
debris	9–7	0.16	18%	17 Jul →
eldorado	5–9	-0.19	17%	17 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.04	25%	17 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.01	37%	16 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	22%	15 Jul →
mirage	0–6	-0.05	33%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.05	9%	14 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.01	15%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	7%	14 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	33%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.13	33%	4 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.08	29%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.21	40%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.03	34%	26 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	42%	26 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.18	29%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.08	27%	26 Jun →
ancient	4–13	0.06	25%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.01	37%	26 Jun →
vertigo	9–5	0.02	24%	26 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	35%	26 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	9%	26 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.01	23%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	19%	25 Jun →
vertigo	13–4	0.04	31%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.07	27%	20 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.06	33%	20 Jun →
dust2	0–4	-0.05	17%	20 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	43%	20 Jun →
ancient	2–8	-0.05	56%	20 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.00	35%	20 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	22%	20 Jun →
vertigo	13–5	0.08	34%	18 Jun →
cache	4–13	0.02	19%	18 Jun →
vertigo	9–6	0.20	27%	18 Jun →
nuke	8–8	0.03	17%	18 Jun →
cache	11–13	-0.02	18%	18 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.01	33%	18 Jun →
anubis	6–13	0.05	19%	18 Jun →
mirage	0–3	-0.08	0%	18 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	22%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.03	20%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.02	33%	18 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	17%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	18%	18 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.06	24%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.12	22%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.02	35%	13 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.09	34%	13 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.05	38%	13 Jun →
vertigo	13–8	-0.03	24%	13 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.06	43%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.09	40%	12 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	28%	12 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.03	19%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.11	22%	12 Jun →
nuke	9–6	0.07	14%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.00	26%	12 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.02	27%	11 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.11	42%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.12	16%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–1	-0.05	7%	11 Jun →
dust2	13–2	-0.02	32%	11 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	23%	10 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.08	24%	10 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.15	33%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.06	28%	10 Jun →