Pasi Olervo

Pasi Olervo — CS2 Stats

FI76561199119867907[U:1:1159602179]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,113Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#82931 of 237551 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,111 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (19 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,111 → 2,111
+56Tracked matches · now 6,113
+6.7ppWin rate · 33.3% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 17 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,703 +3,313 4 May3 Sept · 6 days played
16,39019,703peak 19,7034 May3 Sept
19,816Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,111Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-04-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,111
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 389 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPasi OlervoFACEITLevel 10 · 2,111 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,111csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning68
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateWWLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.9
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.8
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time566ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 23 May
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · ancient, 25 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 9 Jun
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 23 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
715In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA22121055%0.03
anubisC2191243%0.02
nukeB168850%0.02
vertigoA95456%0.01
dust2D92722%-0.03
infernoA85363%0.03
cacheD51420%-0.02
mirage41325%0.06
overpass4040%-0.02
train2020%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,040Matches
50%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
83.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke80259%1.2518.7
Ancient71649%1.1817.9
Anubis61148%1.1117.9
Vertigo32559%1.2819.5
Overpass23043%1.1718.3
Train21651%1.2619.5
Dust221130%1.0116.3
Inferno13032%1.0215.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
545msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
63.5%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
11.52HE damage / grenade
5.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.252% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–11-0.0411%20 Sept
inferno13–110.0029%14 Sept
dust24–13-0.0927%10 Sept
nuke14–160.0317%10 Sept
inferno13–90.0318%10 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0310%10 Sept
ancient14–160.0216%8 Sept
nuke16–130.0232%6 Sept
ancient13–70.0930%4 Sept
vertigo13–90.0317%3 Sept
anubis13–160.0524%2 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0237%31 Aug
anubis10–13-0.098%30 Aug
ancient10–130.0112%27 Aug
dust25–130.0528%27 Aug
ancient13–80.0337%25 Aug
ancient11–130.0535%23 Aug
anubis10–130.0119%22 Aug
ancient9–130.0728%22 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0124%18 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0320%18 Aug
anubis4–130.0421%18 Aug
vertigo9–130.0320%17 Aug
vertigo7–130.0326%17 Aug
vertigo19–170.0324%13 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0526%13 Aug
ancient13–90.0127%9 Aug
anubis11–130.1023%9 Aug
nuke13–60.1337%8 Aug
vertigo13–110.0321%6 Aug
dust24–13-0.0814%5 Aug
nuke13–50.0016%2 Aug
cache2–13-0.0631%2 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0122%28 Jul
ancient14–160.0020%27 Jul
mirage11–130.1021%27 Jul
anubis13–80.1224%27 Jul
cache1–13-0.0816%27 Jul
dust213–160.0217%27 Jul
anubis13–50.0612%26 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0012%16 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0810%8 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0917%7 Jul
vertigo12–12-0.0519%6 Jul
inferno13–40.0426%5 Jul
anubis17–190.0017%4 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0115%4 Jul
dust211–13-0.0624%4 Jul
nuke13–70.0436%4 Jul
train12–12-0.0016%2 Jul
nuke13–100.0926%28 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0026%28 Jun
vertigo5–130.0626%28 Jun
train9–13-0.0417%28 Jun
nuke13–80.0312%25 Jun
anubis14–160.0424%25 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0616%16 Jun
ancient11–130.0214%16 Jun
ancient13–60.0620%14 Jun
nuke13–90.0018%14 Jun
ancient13–60.0419%11 Jun
nuke11–130.0423%10 Jun
anubis16–120.0722%9 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0614%9 Jun
anubis13–20.0423%6 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0120%5 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0517%5 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0230%4 Jun
dust26–13-0.0821%4 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0219%1 Jun
ancient16–130.0522%27 May
anubis13–10-0.0022%27 May
inferno13–110.0833%23 May
nuke13–100.0921%23 May
dust213–90.0223%23 May
mirage13–10.1527%23 May
ancient13–80.0333%23 May
mirage8–130.0214%22 May
inferno13–70.0622%22 May
overpass9–13-0.0036%22 May
dust213–50.0131%22 May
ancient13–40.0529%22 May
dust26–13-0.0120%20 May
anubis10–13-0.0922%19 May
overpass7–13-0.0714%13 May
anubis26–280.0121%9 May
anubis11–13-0.0115%6 May
inferno13–160.0230%4 May
anubis13–60.0719%4 May
cache13–70.0622%4 May
cache7–13-0.0513%1 May
anubis13–40.0823%1 May
nuke17–19-0.0224%1 May
anubis13–50.099%28 Apr
overpass13–160.0425%27 Apr
ancient13–80.0825%27 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0325%22 Apr
cache9–130.0421%22 Apr
anubis9–13-0.036%21 Apr
ancient16–120.1514%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →