meow

meow — CS2 Stats

76561199082494718[U:1:1122228990]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,258Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,182Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#67338 of 259149 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,447 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (48 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,182 → 21,182
0Faceit ELO · 3,447 → 3,447
+108Tracked matches · now 4,258
−20.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 30.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,182 +0 25 Apr – 14 Sept · 7 days played
21,18221,182peak 21,18225 Apr14 Sept
Faceit ELO: 3,447 +0 29 Aug – 14 Sept · 6 observations
3,4473,447peak 3,44729 Aug14 Sept
21,182Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,447Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-01-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,447
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 53 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,182
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,818 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmeowFACEITLevel 10 · 3,447 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,182 · Pink bandPEAK ELO3,447csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning64
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–53Last 10047%Win rateLLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.9
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time466ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 466ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%−6.2%
first ⅓ avg 32.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · mirage, 24 Apr →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · overpass, 18 Feb →
313msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 11 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 3 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 63% over 19infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3316–1748%0.03
mirageA1912–763%0.04
nukeB126–650%0.02
anubisC104–640%0.00
overpassC104–640%0.01
infernoD92–722%0.00
cache—41–325%-0.04
ancient—32–167%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,632Matches
57%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
87.5ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage100755%1.3018.0
Dust298259%1.3818.6
Anubis72958%1.3718.9
Ancient68756%1.3118.6
Nuke62059%1.4118.8
Inferno12550%1.1816.5
Train6549%1.2016.7
Overpass5753%1.2016.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.5%Spray accuracy
71.5%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
466msReaction time
51.4%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
5.89HE damage / grenade
10.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–16-0.0419%25 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0128%25 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0134%16 Oct →
nuke13–70.0624%8 Oct →
mirage5–110.0742%8 Oct →
mirage5–20.0350%8 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0933%8 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0519%7 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0224%7 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0329%26 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0411%26 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0317%25 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0337%25 Sept →
anubis13–100.0031%23 Sept →
dust25–130.0022%23 Sept →
mirage13–50.1319%23 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0910%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0628%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0631%22 Sept →
anubis8–130.0432%20 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0130%15 Sept →
dust211–130.0236%15 Sept →
cache13–100.0334%12 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0225%11 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0429%11 Sept →
dust211–130.0122%10 Sept →
cache7–10-0.0420%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.0220%9 Sept →
mirage13–30.0421%9 Sept →
anubis11–130.0329%9 Sept →
dust213–70.0725%9 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0219%30 Aug →
dust217–190.1633%16 Aug →
mirage13–110.0126%11 Aug →
mirage13–70.0636%7 Aug →
ancient13–110.0234%8 Jul →
mirage8–130.0026%22 Jun →
dust213–60.0525%22 Jun →
inferno11–130.0223%5 Jun →
overpass14–160.0733%19 May →
ancient5–130.0623%1 May →
inferno13–100.0731%1 May →
nuke10–130.0227%1 May →
dust22–130.0050%27 Apr →
overpass8–130.0229%26 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0029%26 Apr →
dust213–30.0722%25 Apr →
inferno13–80.0631%25 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0223%25 Apr →
mirage13–80.1934%24 Apr →
dust213–60.1742%24 Apr →
dust213–30.0739%24 Apr →
mirage13–40.1729%24 Apr →
mirage13–3-0.0363%23 Apr →
overpass11–130.0233%23 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0036%23 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0233%23 Apr →
anubis13–3-0.0232%23 Apr →
dust219–160.0248%23 Apr →
overpass13–110.0530%22 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0321%21 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0019%21 Apr →
dust28–130.0221%13 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0418%12 Apr →
mirage5–130.0418%12 Apr →
dust213–80.0929%12 Apr →
nuke13–40.1758%6 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0720%1 Apr →
nuke13–16-0.0332%31 Mar →
mirage13–70.0557%31 Mar →
dust214–160.0750%31 Mar →
overpass13–9-0.0035%31 Mar →
dust216–140.0327%31 Mar →
mirage1–13-0.0647%31 Mar →
dust213–70.1333%30 Mar →
inferno13–160.0335%22 Mar →
dust27–130.029%21 Mar →
overpass2–13-0.0229%21 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0254%20 Mar →
anubis11–130.0125%20 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0441%18 Mar →
overpass13–40.0445%1 Mar →
inferno2–13-0.0329%1 Mar →
dust25–130.0033%1 Mar →
mirage19–17-0.0227%27 Feb →
dust213–6-0.0225%27 Feb →
mirage13–100.0025%26 Feb →
dust28–130.0218%26 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0018%26 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0036%26 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0337%26 Feb →
anubis11–130.0114%20 Feb →
overpass10–130.0067%18 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0620%18 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0328%7 Feb →
ancient13–90.0430%4 Feb →
nuke13–20.0441%3 Feb →
nuke13–100.0736%1 Feb →
anubis13–100.0634%31 Jan →
dust216–140.0625%25 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.