-NightmareZ- — CS2 Stats

76561199077826133[U:1:1117560405]

4,121Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,025 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-NightmareZ-FACEITLevel 10 · 3,025 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning61
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression5.5
Utility4.4
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.1
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time577ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–5
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
22Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA25151060%0.01
anubisC2291341%-0.01
nukeC1771041%-0.00
vertigoS128467%0.03
mirageD72529%-0.02
overpassS54180%0.01
trainA53260%0.02
inferno43175%-0.02
dust232167%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,788Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
83.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient63552%1.1016.9
Anubis52151%1.0516.1
Nuke37653%1.0816.9
Vertigo33756%1.0916.5
Mirage18046%1.0016.0
Inferno16749%1.0916.2
Overpass15956%1.1016.5
Train9347%1.0016.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
583msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
59.2%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
6.96HE damage / grenade
5.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4638 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0208% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0225%16 Aug
nuke13–110.0316%22 Jun
nuke22–19-0.0123%21 Jun
mirage20–22-0.0323%9 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0220%6 Jun
ancient25–21-0.0227%31 May
ancient13–1-0.0210%30 May
ancient13–100.0634%7 May
ancient7–13-0.0022%6 May
anubis7–13-0.0323%6 May
ancient9–13-0.0221%30 Apr
ancient11–130.0023%30 Apr
ancient13–60.0331%26 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0615%18 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0228%10 Apr
overpass13–3-0.0322%10 Apr
nuke12–16-0.0313%5 Apr
nuke13–50.0024%5 Apr
anubis14–16-0.059%5 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0518%5 Apr
vertigo6–130.0316%4 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0216%26 Mar
ancient9–130.0515%26 Mar
ancient13–80.0220%22 Mar
anubis13–70.0317%8 Mar
nuke14–16-0.0029%12 Feb
anubis13–60.0423%9 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0221%18 Nov
train13–90.0528%6 Oct
ancient13–110.0113%15 Sept
overpass16–130.0323%11 Sept
dust27–120.0119%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0618%17 Aug
overpass8–13-0.0312%5 Aug
ancient13–110.0019%29 Jun
anubis13–5-0.065%4 Jun
train5–130.0418%3 Jun
mirage13–30.1215%29 May
mirage9–12-0.0118%22 May
anubis2–13-0.0612%18 May
nuke14–16-0.0023%15 May
nuke8–13-0.0441%4 May
nuke13–7-0.0611%3 May
anubis13–30.0235%30 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0113%31 Mar
train13–16-0.0119%11 Mar
anubis13–10.0629%5 Mar
train13–70.0128%1 Mar
train16–14-0.0031%23 Feb
nuke16–12-0.0216%17 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0511%1 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0111%31 Jan
nuke16–14-0.0216%16 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0217%28 Dec
anubis13–10.0629%12 Dec
ancient13–80.1326%23 Nov
ancient13–11-0.0211%23 Nov
ancient13–60.0216%22 Nov
ancient5–130.0114%21 Nov
anubis13–100.0220%8 Nov
ancient9–13-0.0415%2 Nov
ancient7–130.0123%20 Oct
vertigo13–30.0811%18 Oct
anubis13–80.0125%15 Oct
vertigo13–80.0228%14 Oct
vertigo13–70.0612%13 Oct
dust213–70.0815%8 Oct
vertigo13–160.0524%7 Oct
anubis8–13-0.058%5 Oct
dust213–00.1011%3 Oct
anubis4–13-0.0720%27 Sept
ancient9–130.0621%19 Sept
ancient16–130.0224%14 Sept
vertigo16–120.0620%14 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0223%10 Sept
ancient13–40.0725%8 Aug
nuke13–50.1446%21 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0623%27 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0124%9 Jun
nuke12–160.0118%8 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0424%7 Jun
vertigo13–90.0216%21 May
anubis16–130.0225%16 May
mirage3–13-0.1332%8 May
vertigo5–13-0.0412%20 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0319%4 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0420%4 Apr
anubis10–130.016%2 Apr
vertigo13–10-0.0326%22 Mar
anubis10–130.0216%10 Mar
anubis13–16-0.0115%10 Mar
inferno16–130.0127%10 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0618%10 Mar
vertigo3–100.0218%10 Mar
vertigo13–30.0720%10 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0228%10 Mar
nuke5–130.0616%10 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0317%9 Mar
overpass13–80.0913%9 Mar
vertigo16–13-0.0316%9 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →