FilthyPhil — CS2 Stats

76561199074599878[U:1:1114334150]✓ No bans

530Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
709Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,460Blue band · top ~31.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15960 of 24485 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate47.2%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy12.0%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.160.990.99above
Match win rate50.4%43.9%44.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFilthyPhilFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,460 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning50
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47494Last 10047%Win rateLLWLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression6.1
Utility2.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.7

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.0
Utility2.2
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time590ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — train 13–4
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 100% over 5nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C167944%-0.01
ancientA159660%0.02
cacheC125742%-0.00
nukeD124833%-0.02
anubisC114736%0.00
infernoC104640%-0.01
vertigoC73443%0.00
trainS550100%0.05
mirageC52340%-0.02
overpass220100%-0.03
shelter110100%0.01
fachwerk1010%0.05
boulder110100%-0.03
office1010%-0.02
alpine1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,784Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
907Matches
50.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
47.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
12.0%Shot accuracy
2,223MVPs
332Hours (in match)
1,141Bombs planted
200Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,659inferno
1,588dust2
706nuke
482vertigo
412train
50office
17lake
13italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

82Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
600msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
7.95HE damage / grenade
2.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3807 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.5621% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–13-0.108%22 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0713%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0413%22 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0419%22 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0524%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0220%21 Aug
anubis13–110.0414%15 Aug
inferno11–30.0216%15 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0512%15 Aug
cache8–130.0135%8 Aug
overpass13–4-0.0120%8 Aug
train13–110.0644%8 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0126%8 Aug
dust29–130.0423%8 Aug
anubis7–130.0835%8 Aug
anubis13–60.0221%5 Aug
ancient13–20.0713%5 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0022%5 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0113%4 Aug
cache15–150.0227%4 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0027%4 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0622%2 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0313%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0124%1 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0315%1 Aug
anubis14–160.0618%29 Jul
dust211–130.0220%29 Jul
nuke13–90.0223%29 Jul
ancient13–100.0814%27 Jul
ancient16–130.0220%27 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0325%25 Jul
ancient13–40.0720%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0312%25 Jul
ancient13–80.1116%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0141%25 Jul
anubis10–130.0118%25 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0727%23 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0315%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0212%19 Jul
nuke13–40.0217%19 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0937%19 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0411%19 Jul
anubis13–9-0.048%19 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0838%18 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0414%18 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0431%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0623%18 Jul
dust25–130.0542%18 Jul
cache13–110.0423%18 Jul
shelter13–60.0116%10 Jul
fachwerk11–130.0525%10 Jul
boulder7–2-0.0314%10 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0523%30 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0130%30 Jun
dust28–13-0.0212%29 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0516%29 Jun
train13–40.1625%10 Jun
ancient13–30.022%10 Jun
dust210–13-0.0126%10 Jun
nuke13–80.0124%10 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0116%10 Jun
dust213–8-0.0017%10 Jun
cache13–7-0.0239%10 Jun
vertigo13–100.0423%10 Jun
ancient13–60.0313%10 Jun
dust29–13-0.0321%9 Jun
train13–40.0220%9 Jun
nuke2–7-0.0350%9 Jun
cache13–3-0.017%9 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0721%7 Jun
office6–13-0.0222%7 Jun
mirage4–130.0517%7 Jun
dust213–9-0.054%7 Jun
vertigo11–13-0.0318%7 Jun
vertigo6–100.0629%7 Jun
train13–8-0.0232%6 Jun
alpine1–13-0.0414%6 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0318%6 Jun
ancient12–120.0229%6 Jun
dust213–5-0.019%6 Jun
vertigo4–13-0.0317%6 Jun
cache3–13-0.0432%5 Jun
inferno8–130.0324%3 Jun
cache8–13-0.0511%3 Jun
nuke12–120.0647%3 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0218%2 Jun
cache5–00.1029%2 Jun
dust24–13-0.0623%2 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0716%2 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0112%2 Jun
train13–30.0145%2 Jun
ancient13–80.0821%2 Jun
dust213–110.0522%2 Jun
vertigo13–30.0419%31 May
cache5–13-0.0229%31 May
mirage13–6-0.0213%31 May
cache10–130.0326%31 May
inferno13–20.0218%31 May
anubis13–60.0210%31 May
dust213–80.0129%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →