cren — CS2 Stats

76561199061890090[U:1:1101624362]

2,754Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,938Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,511Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10143 of 52031 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,882 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

23,435Peak Premier on CSDB

1,882Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,882
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 119 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 23,511
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,489 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,966), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	42.9%	47.0%	48.5%	5.7% short
Shot accuracy	5.6%	12.7%	13.3%	7.7% short
Kill/death ratio	1.17	1.07	1.07	above
Match win rate	49.1%	46.4%	47.0%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning50

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateWLWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression7.6

Utility4.5

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.0

Utility4.5

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time563ms−12ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms

Headshot accuracy20.9%+2.8%

first ⅓ avg 18.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–8

13–3Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 19nukeWeakest map · 29% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	30	14–16	47%	0.03
dust2	A	19	12–7	63%	0.04
nuke	D	14	4–10	29%	0.01
anubis	A	11	6–5	55%	0.04
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	0.00
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
overpass	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

75,648Lifetime kills

1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players

3,940Matches

49.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players

42.9%Headshot %

5.6%Shot accuracy

10,820MVPs

1,661Hours (in match)

2,804Bombs planted

1,246Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,886

M4A4 / M4A1-S15,021

AWP7,171

Desert Eagle4,394

P2000 / USP-S3,384

Glock-182,975

SSG 081,944

MAC-101,252

MP91,146

Galil AR934

Lifetime map wins

9,779dust2

5,497nuke

3,284inferno

945vertigo

754train

4office

3safehouse

1ar_monastery

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

281Matches

53%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

92.2ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	119	56%	1.29	18.6
Dust2	48	52%	1.22	19.4
Ancient	34	47%	1.08	18.6
Inferno	22	45%	1.00	15.4
Nuke	18	56%	1.18	20.0
Train	15	73%	1.73	21.2
Anubis	9	56%	1.04	15.3
Vertigo	8	12%	0.88	15.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.5%Spray accuracy

80.7%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

554msReaction time

41.3%T opening success

43.8%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

4.0%Flash assists

6.66HE damage / grenade

8.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4726 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–4	-0.05	13%	30 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	13%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.05	25%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	25%	29 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	25%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	31%	29 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.09	7%	29 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.03	26%	28 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.03	25%	28 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	21%	28 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	17%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	17%	27 Aug →
mirage	12–16	0.05	22%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.08	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	15%	17 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	18%	17 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	17%	17 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.10	30%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	23%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.03	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.10	25%	15 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	22%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.07	29%	14 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	23%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.11	24%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	24%	3 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	20%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.11	20%	3 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	16%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.10	20%	2 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	12%	1 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	33%	1 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	21%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.13	25%	31 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.02	21%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.04	24%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.11	21%	31 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	10%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	20%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.07	33%	19 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	23%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	21%	19 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	11%	16 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.08	21%	16 Jun →
nuke	0–13	-0.06	17%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.10	28%	15 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	26%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	17%	13 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.12	22%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–10	-0.00	24%	13 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	29%	13 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.05	19%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	27%	12 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	13%	11 Jun →
overpass	13–6	-0.04	12%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.09	28%	11 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.06	22%	11 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.12	16%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.12	24%	10 Jun →
mirage	16–12	-0.00	15%	10 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.00	18%	10 Jun →
anubis	15–15	0.01	15%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.01	12%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.02	21%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.03	16%	10 Jun →
mirage	16–12	0.01	21%	9 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	15%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	28%	9 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.04	19%	9 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.02	23%	8 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	25%	8 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	17%	8 Jun →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	21%	8 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.04	20%	8 Jun →
anubis	16–14	0.01	12%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.15	19%	7 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.00	14%	7 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.03	22%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.06	34%	7 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.05	22%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.06	19%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.04	21%	7 Jun →
anubis	1–13	0.00	17%	7 Jun →
nuke	15–15	0.03	23%	7 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.00	10%	6 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.01	16%	6 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.09	5%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.15	17%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.02	21%	6 Jun →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	18%	6 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	14%	6 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	17%	6 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	14%	6 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.03	17%	6 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.09	13%	6 Jun →
dust2	16–12	0.04	17%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.05	14%	6 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	21%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.08	15%	2 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.10	15%	2 Jun →