pierupylly

pierupylly — CS2 Stats

76561199008370441[U:1:1048104713]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

816Tracked matches20%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,303Blue band · top ~48% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 978 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 61 days played since 10 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,303 -104 18 Sept23 Sept · 3 days played
11,30311,407peak 11,40718 Sept23 Sept
11,407Peak Premier in tracked matches
978Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2026-06-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 978
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 73 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-23
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 104 below peak (11,407)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,697 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpierupyllyFACEITLevel 8 · 978 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER11,303 · Blue bandPEAK ELO978csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning52
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4258Last 10042%Win rateLWLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 416 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility3.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.2
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time573ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–13 · dust2, 4 Aug
31%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 28 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · inferno, 9 Jul
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 29% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC34142041%-0.00
ancientD2471729%-0.01
dust2A127558%0.03
nukeS107370%0.00
anubisC73443%-0.04
infernoC52340%-0.05
cache3030%-0.03
vertigo31233%-0.02
train1010%0.01
overpass110100%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

714Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26454%1.0514.6
Ancient12739%0.9816.5
Dust210253%1.0414.2
Nuke7553%1.0415.3
Anubis6957%1.0114.2
Inferno4951%0.9614.8
Cache944%0.8213.4
Vertigo933%0.8916.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
575msReaction time
47.3%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
7.54HE damage / grenade
4.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.2518% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis4–13-0.0518%23 Sept
dust216–120.0417%20 Sept
mirage3–9-0.039%19 Sept
mirage13–80.0319%19 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0513%19 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0322%19 Sept
ancient9–13-0.090%18 Sept
ancient8–130.0214%8 Sept
mirage5–13-0.077%7 Sept
mirage11–130.0123%7 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0714%6 Sept
mirage4–13-0.118%6 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0410%6 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0417%6 Sept
nuke12–160.0018%5 Sept
dust213–6-0.0025%4 Sept
cache11–13-0.0310%4 Sept
ancient10–130.0021%4 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0212%4 Sept
mirage13–60.0615%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0120%2 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0520%1 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0518%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0515%28 Aug
dust213–40.1020%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0331%28 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0218%26 Aug
mirage4–130.0511%23 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0217%21 Aug
dust28–13-0.0420%19 Aug
mirage13–90.0214%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0220%16 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0112%15 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0013%14 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0120%14 Aug
mirage13–110.0119%13 Aug
dust212–30.097%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.018%10 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0718%10 Aug
dust213–11-0.0216%9 Aug
ancient13–160.0311%8 Aug
ancient11–130.0113%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0221%7 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0410%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0019%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0214%7 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1024%6 Aug
vertigo13–110.029%5 Aug
dust29–130.1514%4 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0522%3 Aug
inferno13–110.0216%1 Aug
nuke13–30.0610%31 Jul
nuke16–130.0223%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0113%28 Jul
ancient14–160.0715%26 Jul
dust213–20.077%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0513%24 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0420%23 Jul
mirage9–130.0716%22 Jul
mirage13–80.1014%22 Jul
mirage16–140.0312%21 Jul
ancient13–90.0311%21 Jul
mirage3–8-0.070%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0410%15 Jul
mirage13–50.006%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0419%14 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0113%13 Jul
mirage13–50.0015%13 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0211%13 Jul
ancient7–130.0212%11 Jul
ancient13–100.0721%11 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0417%11 Jul
mirage9–12-0.050%11 Jul
mirage6–20.030%11 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0525%10 Jul
mirage13–80.0417%9 Jul
nuke9–40.0614%9 Jul
inferno7–9-0.054%9 Jul
anubis6–13-0.073%6 Jul
dust24–130.0210%4 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0220%1 Jul
cache0–7-0.089%1 Jul
cache5–130.0218%1 Jul
mirage8–130.0313%30 Jun
ancient13–10-0.029%28 Jun
ancient13–160.0213%27 Jun
dust213–60.0120%23 Jun
mirage13–90.1016%22 Jun
train10–130.0111%21 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0317%14 Jun
nuke13–70.0114%14 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0616%13 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0812%10 Jun
ancient13–8-0.046%10 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0615%10 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0121%10 Jun
nuke10–70.020%10 Jun
overpass9–7-0.1011%10 Jun
inferno9–7-0.0613%10 Jun
vertigo1–13-0.0417%10 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →