Sasba

Sasba — CS2 Stats

FI76561198976145224[U:1:1015879496]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

445Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating15,921Purple band · top ~24.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,070 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 3 Sep 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,921 +6,065 9 Sept8 Sept · 5 days played
9,73218,801peak 18,8019 Sept8 Sept
19,201Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,070Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2024-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,070
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,880 below peak (18,801)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,079 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSasbaFACEITLevel 5 · 1,070 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,921 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,070csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning51
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44479Last 10044%Win rateLLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.7pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.9
Utility3.8
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.1
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time557ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 8 Apr
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · dust2, 1 May
406msFastest reaction time · 7–10 · ancient, 8 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L7Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25111444%-0.01
ancientD1441029%-0.01
infernoB136746%0.00
nukeC114736%-0.00
anubisC104640%-0.01
dust2C104640%-0.02
cacheA74357%-0.01
overpass330100%0.01
vertigo31233%-0.00
office220100%0.10
sanctum110100%0.03
poseidon1010%-0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

516Matches
52%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
74.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12354%1.0615.8
Ancient4245%1.0115.1
Inferno3644%1.0615.2
Nuke3642%0.8915.4
Vertigo2767%1.0815.0
Anubis2361%1.1015.4
Dust22162%1.0415.5
Cache1155%1.0912.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
544msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
49.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.60HE damage / grenade
4.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2762% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage0–7-0.100%8 Sept
ancient3–130.0615%8 Sept
ancient7–10-0.0623%8 Sept
mirage4–13-0.078%8 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0418%8 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0431%8 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0217%7 Sept
nuke13–40.0629%7 Sept
cache13–30.039%7 Sept
inferno9–130.0215%7 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0316%7 Sept
mirage13–10.1139%7 Sept
cache10–13-0.1215%7 Sept
cache13–40.0318%7 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0329%2 Sept
mirage13–110.0115%2 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0923%2 Sept
cache13–1-0.0026%2 Sept
mirage13–70.0119%2 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0323%2 Sept
mirage3–100.0425%1 Sept
dust25–13-0.0910%30 Aug
dust213–100.0032%30 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0023%29 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0417%27 Aug
inferno13–90.0729%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0332%17 Aug
mirage4–130.0225%28 Jul
dust23–13-0.0610%15 Jun
cache9–13-0.0314%10 Jun
mirage11–130.0022%9 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0513%2 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0522%1 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0310%21 May
dust216–13-0.0019%18 May
inferno9–13-0.0522%15 May
nuke10–13-0.0314%11 May
inferno13–8-0.0347%11 May
anubis10–13-0.0613%6 May
cache10–10.0620%6 May
ancient11–13-0.0421%4 May
overpass13–90.0117%4 May
dust210–13-0.0412%3 May
ancient11–13-0.0414%2 May
dust20–13-0.0250%1 May
cache12–12-0.0427%1 May
dust20–13-0.0633%29 Apr
ancient8–130.0618%20 Apr
inferno12–12-0.0218%19 Apr
nuke13–110.0320%19 Apr
sanctum9–10.0327%8 Apr
inferno9–30.2031%8 Apr
nuke7–90.0020%8 Apr
vertigo12–120.1122%8 Apr
vertigo8–13-0.0429%8 Apr
dust219–17-0.0228%2 Apr
anubis13–40.1120%1 Apr
anubis7–13-0.055%1 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0213%1 Apr
poseidon4–9-0.1725%31 Mar
ancient12–120.0228%29 Mar
mirage12–120.0121%29 Mar
mirage8–130.0123%21 Mar
office13–70.1515%18 Mar
office13–100.0422%18 Mar
anubis13–80.0721%17 Mar
anubis13–30.0323%17 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0315%17 Mar
nuke3–130.0821%16 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0314%16 Mar
ancient13–60.0925%14 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0615%12 Mar
mirage13–90.0218%11 Mar
nuke15–15-0.0121%9 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0322%9 Mar
dust215–15-0.0021%9 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0929%9 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0123%9 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0322%9 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0421%28 Nov
ancient4–13-0.0518%28 Nov
dust213–30.0539%16 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0718%28 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0043%17 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0530%9 Dec
mirage11–13-0.059%2 Dec
anubis13–10-0.0227%12 Nov
vertigo13–8-0.0740%27 Sept
ancient7–130.0116%12 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0115%10 Sept
nuke13–100.0232%10 Sept
overpass13–60.0526%10 Sept
mirage13–60.0028%10 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0128%10 Sept
inferno13–00.0729%9 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0436%9 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0911%9 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0026%3 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0335%3 Sept
inferno8–13-0.048%3 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →