Timmy

Timmy — CS2 Stats

76561198969211176[U:1:1008945448]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,583Tracked matches54%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,213Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#77481 of 252584 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,158 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+213Premier CS Rating · 20,000 → 20,213

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,213 +5,191 30 Aug – 17 Oct · 35 days played
15,02221,921peak 21,92130 Aug17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,158 +0 30 Aug – 22 Sept · 6 observations
1,1581,158peak 1,15830 Aug22 Sept
22,559Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,158Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,158
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 43 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,708 below peak (21,921)
  • +513 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,787 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTimmyFACEITLevel 5 · 1,158 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,213 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,158csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning55
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–42–6Last 10052%Win rateTWLLLLWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 7–10–3 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.3
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.5
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time584ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 6–1 · inferno, 10 Oct →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 7–0 · nuke, 21 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 30 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
9–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC198–1142%0.01
infernoA1810–856%0.02
nukeA159–660%0.01
ancientC146–843%-0.02
dust2A149–564%0.02
anubisC114–736%-0.00
cacheS96–367%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

197Matches
47%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
72.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4747%0.9113.6
Dust23551%1.0014.7
Ancient3247%0.9114.1
Nuke2959%1.0413.5
Inferno2433%0.9113.7
Anubis1155%0.7911.7
Overpass1145%0.7211.6
Cache520%1.1115.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
585msReaction time
49.6%T opening success
38.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
6.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7795% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.1386% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0321%17 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0414%17 Oct →
nuke8–130.0512%16 Oct →
mirage9–130.0217%16 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0714%16 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0422%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0823%15 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0511%15 Oct →
inferno15–150.0515%13 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0013%13 Oct →
nuke13–100.0517%11 Oct →
anubis15–150.025%11 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.116%10 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0312%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0921%10 Oct →
inferno6–10.1911%10 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0315%10 Oct →
inferno8–130.009%10 Oct →
ancient13–100.0210%10 Oct →
nuke13–90.0216%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.0511%9 Oct →
nuke13–70.0117%9 Oct →
inferno13–100.0517%8 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0110%8 Oct →
inferno13–110.0021%7 Oct →
cache13–80.0516%7 Oct →
mirage15–150.0111%7 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0214%6 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0124%6 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0311%5 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.029%5 Oct →
dust213–80.0324%5 Oct →
mirage6–130.0416%4 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0815%4 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.049%4 Oct →
anubis13–60.0618%4 Oct →
dust213–50.0316%3 Oct →
cache13–60.0110%3 Oct →
inferno11–130.0317%2 Oct →
mirage13–90.0217%2 Oct →
inferno5–130.0115%30 Sept →
dust213–90.0217%29 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0114%26 Sept →
nuke5–120.0331%26 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0213%26 Sept →
dust213–40.0616%25 Sept →
dust24–13-0.1012%24 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0111%24 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0316%24 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0229%23 Sept →
dust28–130.018%23 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0315%23 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0213%23 Sept →
inferno6–130.0020%22 Sept →
mirage5–130.0323%22 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0211%22 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0515%21 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0433%21 Sept →
nuke7–00.0636%21 Sept →
nuke13–30.0316%19 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0210%19 Sept →
ancient13–100.1318%19 Sept →
mirage13–110.0615%19 Sept →
inferno13–90.0428%17 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0318%17 Sept →
ancient13–90.0016%17 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.068%17 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0118%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.0621%16 Sept →
dust213–30.0730%16 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0921%15 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.005%15 Sept →
dust213–60.0621%15 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0218%15 Sept →
inferno13–70.0518%15 Sept →
dust213–110.1321%14 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0413%14 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0719%14 Sept →
anubis13–90.0111%13 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0134%13 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0111%13 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0115%13 Sept →
cache11–20.0217%12 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0219%12 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0119%12 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0922%12 Sept →
anubis5–130.0423%12 Sept →
inferno13–110.0319%12 Sept →
dust29–130.0719%11 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0418%11 Sept →
anubis13–160.0217%10 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0414%9 Sept →
mirage13–80.0216%9 Sept →
ancient7–130.0915%9 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0316%8 Sept →
inferno13–50.0717%8 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0911%7 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0330%7 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.027%7 Sept →
inferno13–110.0321%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.