[λ] Mivbers — CS2 Stats

76561198968689357[U:1:1008423629]

350Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,312Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.0 Learning
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate34.1%42.1%42.1%8.0% short
Shot accuracy13.8%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.000.990.13 short
Match win rate44.8%42.9%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[λ] MivbersFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim22
Positioning50
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53443Last 10053%Win rateWLLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.2
Aggression6.3
Utility2.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.2
Positioning5.0
Utility2.5
Mechanics3.3
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time640ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 682ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 10–2
162Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
34Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 41nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA41241759%-0.00
officeA116555%-0.03
dust2B115645%-0.01
nukeD72529%-0.01
overpassC73443%-0.00
infernoD62433%-0.03
anubisB63350%-0.04
cache440100%0.00
ancient43175%-0.00
vertigo31233%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,329Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
3,294Matches
44.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
34.1%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
6,980MVPs
1,312Hours (in match)
2,595Bombs planted
959Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,150
AWP6,867
Knife2,161
SSG 082,100
FAMAS1,460

Lifetime map wins

5,811dust2
3,085inferno
3,076nuke
1,121office
877vertigo
632train
425lake
250cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

413Matches
47%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
79.2ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2250%1.0113.4
Nuke1547%1.0415.7
Inferno633%0.8711.7
Dust2617%0.9614.2
Ancient540%1.4822.4
Anubis367%1.1912.3
Vertigo250%0.8613.0
Train20%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
25.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.4%Spray accuracy
64.7%Counter-strafing
12.8°Preaim
643msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
7.41HE damage / grenade
4.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.848° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4015 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–90.0012%17 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0510%12 Jun
dust21–9-0.020%1 Jun
mirage6–13-0.106%1 Jun
cache13–20.028%22 May
mirage13–7-0.0120%28 Apr
nuke8–130.0323%27 Apr
mirage11–130.0023%27 Apr
dust27–130.0216%15 Apr
vertigo10–13-0.0233%14 Feb
overpass13–110.0210%31 Jan
inferno13–80.0213%4 Jan
office12–12-0.0714%3 Jan
office13–7-0.0823%3 Jan
office9–13-0.0326%28 Dec
office13–70.1012%28 Dec
office11–5-0.0533%26 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0619%26 Dec
nuke6–13-0.038%26 Nov
office2–13-0.0123%22 Nov
overpass13–20.0215%31 Oct
office13–6-0.0318%21 Oct
office4–13-0.0223%19 Aug
office5–0-0.110%19 Aug
overpass13–16-0.0123%8 Aug
ancient1–13-0.086%8 Aug
nuke4–13-0.066%4 Jul
ancient13–50.0613%22 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0317%9 Jun
dust213–50.0126%16 May
mirage13–9-0.0012%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0711%4 Apr
mirage16–12-0.0120%29 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0218%3 Oct
nuke13–70.0217%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0715%30 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0125%15 Jun
dust213–10-0.038%13 Jun
nuke6–9-0.1316%8 Jun
mirage16–140.0116%1 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0211%31 May
dust213–8-0.017%29 May
mirage16–13-0.049%26 May
ancient13–60.0513%23 Mar
nuke13–110.0616%24 Feb
mirage13–30.0530%4 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0125%27 Jan
mirage13–00.1414%27 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0420%27 Jan
nuke11–130.0615%26 Jan
anubis10–13-0.114%23 Jan
vertigo4–13-0.0513%23 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0415%23 Jan
mirage13–3-0.044%23 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0112%23 Jan
mirage16–120.006%23 Jan
mirage5–13-0.037%23 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0516%12 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0027%12 Jan
mirage16–13-0.0412%12 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0315%11 Jan
anubis10–20.1516%10 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0213%5 Jan
mirage13–50.0012%26 Dec
mirage3–7-0.0613%26 Dec
mirage13–90.0116%26 Dec
vertigo13–110.0810%23 Dec
anubis3–13-0.108%22 Dec
office11–13-0.0324%11 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0411%11 Dec
anubis11–13-0.0313%9 Dec
overpass14–16-0.0110%21 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0713%19 Aug
cache16–120.027%12 Aug
mirage19–160.0117%10 Aug
cache16–60.0117%29 Jul
cache16–5-0.038%28 Jul
overpass16–30.0615%27 Jun
mirage16–120.0311%25 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0110%25 Jun
mirage16–40.039%25 Jun
dust28–16-0.036%13 Jun
dust216–20.035%8 Jun
inferno10–0-0.0723%8 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0314%8 Jun
mirage13–160.086%2 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0215%1 Jun
mirage16–40.0214%26 May
mirage10–160.0014%23 May
dust213–160.0512%22 May
mirage13–16-0.006%17 May
mirage16–120.077%13 Mar
mirage19–15-0.018%14 Feb
dust211–16-0.0614%13 Feb
overpass14–16-0.084%13 Feb
anubis16–8-0.0911%9 Feb
mirage7–16-0.0413%7 Feb
mirage9–70.138%6 Feb
mirage16–5-0.0414%4 Feb
dust216–11-0.0412%4 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →