faaaaaaaahhh

faaaaaaaahhh — CS2 Stats

CH76561198962561417[U:1:1002295689]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,136Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,567Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+39Tracked matches · now 1,136
−3.6ppWin rate · 39.3% → 35.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,335 -2,512 11 Mar – 2 Jul · 23 days played
19,53423,801peak 23,80111 Mar2 Jul
23,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-03-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.8%48.2%50.9%4.1% short
Shot accuracy17.6%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.071.090.07 short
Match win rate50.9%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGfaaaaaaaahhhFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning57
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateWLWLLLTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch1.6

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.7
Utility5.2
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time571ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 13 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · anubis, 5 Apr →
391msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · vertigo, 11 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 50% over 22anubisWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2211–1150%-0.01
mirageD217–1433%-0.00
ancientC167–944%0.00
cacheC125–742%-0.03
anubisD122–1017%-0.03
nukeB84–450%0.04
infernoC52–340%0.01
overpass—20–20%-0.04
vertigo—11–0100%-0.04
poseidon—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

112,370Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
5,164Matches
50.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
46.8%Headshot %
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
14,431MVPs
2,711Hours (in match)
4,850Bombs planted
1,910Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,172
AWP9,762
SSG 085,782
SG 5533,882
MP92,967
Knife2,921

Lifetime map wins

12,551dust2
8,360inferno
2,775train
2,648nuke
2,022vertigo
785safehouse
749lake
398bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,584Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
84.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21662%1.1516.9
Ancient1457%1.0216.7
Mirage1267%1.4318.5
Anubis1050%0.9216.4
Cache786%1.1414.1
Inferno3100%1.2412.0
Nuke10%0.8612.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
88.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
598msReaction time
44.0%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
9.03HE damage / grenade
7.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.4882% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–70.0713%29 Oct →
inferno12–160.0015%24 Oct →
nuke13–10.1513%24 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0215%24 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.049%24 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0117%18 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0214%18 Oct →
nuke7–90.0216%15 Oct →
nuke9–40.2413%13 Oct →
vertigo9–7-0.0441%11 Oct →
dust25–130.0413%11 Oct →
ancient13–90.0619%11 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0615%11 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0016%21 Sept →
cache13–60.029%14 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0127%30 Aug →
ancient3–60.0427%24 Aug →
anubis8–130.0831%24 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0531%23 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0123%18 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0817%16 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0425%16 Aug →
dust216–120.0629%16 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0228%9 Aug →
cache13–60.0225%9 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0423%3 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0222%2 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0121%1 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0528%1 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0516%1 Aug →
inferno10–130.0416%20 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0112%20 Jul →
cache12–16-0.0822%19 Jul →
dust216–14-0.0218%19 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0526%19 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0122%19 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0124%2 Jul →
nuke5–9-0.0135%2 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0416%30 Jun →
mirage7–130.0137%30 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0719%30 Jun →
dust28–130.0114%22 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0926%22 Jun →
nuke13–80.0332%8 Jun →
dust20–13-0.0533%8 Jun →
cache4–13-0.0643%8 Jun →
cache13–6-0.0524%8 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0220%28 May →
dust211–130.0141%17 May →
mirage8–130.0525%14 May →
nuke7–9-0.1113%12 May →
mirage4–130.0518%4 May →
ancient13–100.0126%4 May →
anubis7–13-0.0023%4 May →
dust213–11-0.0120%3 May →
mirage13–50.049%3 May →
poseidon9–4-0.0122%30 Apr →
cache11–13-0.0616%30 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0533%23 Apr →
mirage13–160.0115%20 Apr →
anubis13–16-0.0314%20 Apr →
mirage13–80.0822%13 Apr →
dust213–3-0.0626%13 Apr →
ancient13–40.0230%11 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0525%11 Apr →
mirage1–13-0.0913%8 Apr →
mirage16–12-0.0217%8 Apr →
mirage11–130.0527%5 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0624%5 Apr →
anubis13–70.0413%5 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0532%5 Apr →
anubis3–13-0.0844%5 Apr →
overpass3–13-0.0618%5 Apr →
mirage13–110.0019%4 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0317%4 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0819%4 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0219%4 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0130%3 Apr →
ancient8–130.0131%3 Apr →
ancient13–10.0521%3 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0226%30 Mar →
ancient16–140.0318%30 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0618%30 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0128%29 Mar →
dust213–20.0932%29 Mar →
anubis13–70.0116%29 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0124%25 Mar →
ancient9–130.0119%25 Mar →
dust213–16-0.0619%25 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0421%23 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0311%23 Mar →
dust213–40.1114%23 Mar →
mirage16–130.0120%22 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0623%22 Mar →
ancient11–130.0320%17 Mar →
nuke9–60.0417%11 Mar →
inferno9–50.0026%11 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0324%11 Mar →
mirage13–00.0730%11 Mar →
ancient15–15-0.0323%11 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.