nacho

nacho — CS2 Stats

76561198939861318[U:1:979595590]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,940Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,560 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,560 → 3,560
+4Tracked matches · now 3,940
0.0ppWin rate · 70.0% → 70.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 30 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,560 +0 29 Aug18 Sept · 3 observations
3,5603,560peak 3,56029 Aug18 Sept
3,560Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-03-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,560
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 440 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnachoFACEITLevel 10 · 3,560 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,560csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning59
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6139Last 10061%Win rateLLWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility6.3
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time512ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy29.7%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 29.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 29 May
52%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · cache, 2 Aug
328msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 5 Apr
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 27 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 81% over 16ancientWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26161062%-0.01
dust2S2620677%0.02
nukeS1613381%0.01
ancientC145936%-0.01
infernoC83538%-0.03
cacheC52340%0.01
overpassC52340%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,622Matches
56%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
88.8ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage214956%1.3818.6
Dust264660%1.3518.3
Ancient48253%1.2617.8
Anubis34458%1.3417.8
Nuke32955%1.2917.8
Inferno6362%1.2415.6
Vertigo3560%1.3817.5
Overpass2759%1.4218.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.9%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.0%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
518msReaction time
34.5%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
7.08HE damage / grenade
11.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5095% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0319%12 Sept
mirage11–130.0136%12 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0036%31 Aug
nuke13–70.0232%18 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0543%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0142%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0137%15 Aug
dust213–80.0229%15 Aug
ancient19–150.0222%15 Aug
cache8–130.0113%15 Aug
nuke7–4-0.037%9 Aug
nuke7–50.0038%9 Aug
dust213–7-0.0525%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0632%7 Aug
dust29–130.0319%7 Aug
dust213–7-0.0821%6 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0339%6 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0127%5 Aug
dust213–80.0532%5 Aug
dust213–80.0532%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0052%2 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0527%2 Aug
dust213–110.0431%2 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0126%2 Aug
nuke16–12-0.0031%1 Aug
dust213–90.0330%1 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0238%31 Jul
dust219–160.0427%31 Jul
dust213–110.0831%31 Jul
cache22–19-0.0127%31 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0230%31 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0233%28 Jul
dust213–16-0.0317%28 Jul
nuke13–40.0328%16 Jul
dust29–13-0.0019%13 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0940%13 Jul
dust213–90.0328%12 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0230%12 Jul
dust213–60.0230%12 Jul
cache13–80.0235%12 Jul
cache8–130.0430%11 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0725%11 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0622%11 Jul
dust219–170.0530%10 Jul
nuke13–80.0435%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0136%29 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0129%11 Jun
nuke13–80.0230%7 Jun
nuke8–130.0542%4 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0432%31 May
mirage13–2-0.0515%31 May
inferno14–16-0.0426%31 May
dust213–8-0.0236%30 May
inferno13–30.0438%30 May
dust25–13-0.0425%29 May
mirage13–4-0.0330%29 May
nuke13–20.0929%29 May
dust213–60.0830%28 May
overpass8–13-0.0143%28 May
ancient13–0-0.0133%27 May
mirage6–13-0.0423%16 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0324%5 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0416%5 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0521%3 Apr
dust210–13-0.0327%3 Apr
mirage13–70.0826%3 Apr
overpass0–2-0.0140%3 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0214%3 Apr
overpass0–10.0343%3 Apr
dust213–60.0538%3 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0024%3 Apr
ancient12–160.0327%2 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0526%2 Apr
dust213–80.0027%2 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0821%2 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0124%2 Apr
dust213–50.0838%2 Apr
dust213–50.0838%2 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0821%2 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0124%2 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0317%1 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0216%1 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0216%1 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0317%1 Apr
mirage16–140.0316%1 Apr
nuke13–50.0136%1 Apr
mirage16–140.0316%1 Apr
nuke13–50.0136%1 Apr
ancient11–130.0327%31 Mar
ancient11–130.0327%31 Mar
mirage13–90.0026%31 Mar
mirage13–90.0026%31 Mar
mirage13–20.0130%31 Mar
mirage13–20.0130%31 Mar
dust213–9-0.0135%31 Mar
dust213–9-0.0135%31 Mar
ancient10–130.0431%30 Mar
mirage9–130.0417%30 Mar
mirage9–130.0417%30 Mar
ancient10–130.0431%30 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →