Kjell Eik — CS2 Stats
NE76561198926834985[U:1:966569257]Steam profile ↗
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 5 median | Level 6 median | vs Level 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 50.3% | 44.2% | 44.9% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.6% | 11.2% | 11.8% | 11.3% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.96 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.08 short |
| Match win rate | 52.5% | 45.3% | 45.3% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like b1t 84% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | B | 48 | 24–24 | 50% | -0.00 |
 anubis | A | 19 | 12–7 | 63% | 0.02 |
 nuke | S | 8 | 7–1 | 88% | -0.00 |
 overpass | C | 8 | 3–5 | 38% | -0.02 |
 ancient | D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | -0.01 |
 inferno | D | 5 | 1–4 | 20% | -0.01 |
 dust2 | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | -0.01 |
| italy | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.04 |
 cache | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.00 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 40 | 55% | 1.14 | 15.6 |
| Anubis | 14 | 36% | 0.99 | 15.8 |
| Ancient | 12 | 42% | 0.96 | 14.8 |
| Train | 11 | 73% | 0.83 | 10.6 |
| Inferno | 5 | 20% | 0.64 | 9.4 |
| Dust2 | 3 | 33% | 0.68 | 9.0 |
| Nuke | 1 | 0% | 1.00 | 17.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3348 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.9182% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.13 | 25% | 28 Aug → | |
| mirage | 3–10 | -0.12 | 30% | 4 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | 0.03 | 11% | 4 Aug → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.06 | 10% | 2 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.08 | 29% | 8 Jul → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 8 Jul → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.03 | 20% | 7 Jul → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.00 | 11% | 9 Jun → | |
| italy | 6–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 5 Jun → | |
| cache | 13–6 | 0.00 | 30% | 3 May → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.08 | 25% | 5 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.01 | 23% | 4 Apr → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.07 | 58% | 4 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.01 | 23% | 20 Mar → | |
| anubis | 13–5 | 0.03 | 19% | 20 Mar → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | 0.03 | 38% | 20 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 16–14 | 0.03 | 11% | 20 Mar → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.02 | 27% | 20 Mar → | |
| ancient | 13–9 | -0.04 | 10% | 19 Mar → | |
| inferno | 13–5 | 0.00 | 23% | 19 Mar → | |
| mirage | 15–15 | 0.01 | 22% | 19 Mar → | |
| anubis | 5–11 | -0.03 | 30% | 18 Mar → | |
| anubis | 13–1 | 0.04 | 44% | 18 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | 0.02 | 14% | 16 Mar → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.06 | 24% | 16 Mar → | |
| mirage | 0–5 | -0.05 | 0% | 16 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.06 | 22% | 16 Mar → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.03 | 27% | 16 Mar → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 15 Mar → | |
| anubis | 2–13 | -0.05 | 22% | 15 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–1 | -0.00 | 24% | 13 Mar → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | 0.00 | 18% | 1 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–3 | 0.02 | 20% | 27 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–16 | 0.00 | 20% | 27 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–10 | 0.04 | 15% | 27 Feb → | |
| anubis | 4–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 26 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.00 | 13% | 26 Feb → | |
| overpass | 3–13 | -0.01 | 25% | 26 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–8 | -0.01 | 14% | 26 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | 0.15 | 20% | 26 Feb → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | -0.04 | 22% | 23 Feb → | |
| ancient | 8–13 | 0.01 | 19% | 22 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | 0.08 | 17% | 22 Feb → | |
| overpass | 13–11 | -0.04 | 18% | 22 Feb → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 22 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 16–13 | -0.02 | 22% | 21 Feb → | |
| inferno | 8–13 | -0.03 | 22% | 21 Feb → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.00 | 17% | 21 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–8 | 0.02 | 21% | 21 Feb → | |
| overpass | 9–13 | 0.01 | 20% | 14 Feb → | |
| anubis | 5–13 | -0.02 | 21% | 14 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–7 | -0.06 | 15% | 14 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.00 | 9% | 14 Feb → | |
| nuke | 16–14 | 0.02 | 14% | 14 Feb → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 14 Feb → | |
| mirage | 14–16 | 0.01 | 19% | 14 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 13–3 | -0.01 | 21% | 13 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–16 | 0.03 | 13% | 13 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | -0.09 | 3% | 13 Feb → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | -0.01 | 32% | 13 Feb → | |
| inferno | 8–13 | -0.05 | 12% | 13 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.06 | 19% | 13 Feb → | |
| dust2 | 4–13 | -0.04 | 7% | 12 Feb → | |
| overpass | 6–13 | -0.05 | 8% | 10 Feb → | |
| mirage | 14–16 | -0.04 | 29% | 10 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | -0.01 | 20% | 10 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | -0.02 | 15% | 10 Feb → | |
| mirage | 2–13 | -0.10 | 4% | 9 Feb → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.00 | 8% | 9 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–11 | 0.05 | 13% | 9 Feb → | |
| ancient | 11–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 7 Feb → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.05 | 15% | 5 Feb → | |
| inferno | 9–13 | 0.03 | 16% | 5 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.11 | 18% | 4 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–5 | -0.01 | 38% | 4 Feb → | |
| mirage | 12–16 | 0.02 | 18% | 4 Feb → | |
| overpass | 9–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 4 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–8 | 0.02 | 26% | 4 Feb → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.01 | 9% | 4 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–6 | -0.00 | 18% | 4 Feb → | |
| overpass | 13–11 | -0.02 | 8% | 2 Feb → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.03 | 26% | 2 Feb → | |
| anubis | 10–13 | 0.04 | 16% | 2 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.02 | 16% | 1 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.01 | 18% | 1 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.06 | 7% | 1 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.14 | 29% | 1 Feb → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | 0.01 | 38% | 1 Feb → | |
| ancient | 13–6 | -0.01 | 7% | 1 Feb → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.07 | 21% | 29 Jan → | |
| overpass | 8–13 | -0.01 | 17% | 25 Jan → | |
| overpass | 13–2 | 0.01 | 23% | 25 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–10 | 0.01 | 19% | 25 Jan → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 25 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–16 | 0.02 | 17% | 24 Jan → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | 0.05 | 18% | 24 Jan → | |
| anubis | 13–7 | 0.12 | 14% | 24 Jan → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | 0.01 | 19% | 24 Jan → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | -0.03 | 17% | 24 Jan → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 24 Jan → |
Match data via Leetify.