Cielo — CS2 Stats

76561198871763088[U:1:911497360]

57Tracked matches24%Win rate2026Tracked since
38Hours in CS
CSDB Rating2.6 Learning
Premier CS Rating4,880Grey band · top ~79.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20109 of 26117 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianvs Light Blue band
Headshot rate35.1%40.1%4.9% short
Shot accuracy6.6%7.6%1.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.920.07 short
Match win rate34.3%42.2%7.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Light Blue band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCieloPREMIER4,880 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning34
Utility7

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD16374Last 5728%Win rateLWLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression1.4
Utility0.7
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning3.4
Utility0.7
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time586ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy14.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 12.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 57 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — train 13–3
131Biggest win — inferno
2Longest win streak
42In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 46% over 13mirageWeakest map · 7% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD151147%-0.03
cacheB136746%-0.02
infernoD123925%-0.02
anubis42250%-0.05
office41325%0.03
train220100%0.02
dust22020%0.01
ancient21150%0.01
overpass2020%-0.04
shelter1010%0.02

Across the last 57 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (7% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

1,451Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
102Matches
34.3%Match win rate
35.1%Headshot %
6.6%Shot accuracy
147MVPs
38Hours (in match)
76Bombs planted
23Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

106inferno
55dust2
43train
41nuke
40office
20vertigo
1ar_monastery

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.2%Spray accuracy
65.2%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
609msReaction time
12.5%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.08Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
3.84HE damage / grenade
0.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.118° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1365% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0772 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

7% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis2–13-0.127%29 Aug
train13–11-0.0515%29 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0113%26 Aug
anubis13–60.023%26 Aug
train13–30.1016%26 Aug
office7–130.0350%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0413%20 Aug
shelter1–80.026%19 Aug
office8–130.0416%19 Aug
inferno2–13-0.1313%19 Aug
dust26–13-0.0429%19 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0418%17 Aug
cache5–13-0.0117%17 Aug
dust210–130.0525%16 Aug
mirage3–130.000%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0610%12 Aug
cache15–15-0.067%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0110%29 Jul
inferno13–70.0414%28 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0516%28 Jul
cache3–13-0.0217%18 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0417%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.0517%17 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0112%15 Jul
mirage7–13-0.068%15 Jul
inferno7–130.033%14 Jul
cache13–11-0.0012%14 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0113%13 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0014%13 Jul
mirage3–80.008%13 Jul
mirage5–50.018%13 Jul
cache13–9-0.0119%8 Jul
inferno12–120.0711%8 Jul
inferno13–40.0115%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.002%8 Jul
cache13–5-0.033%8 Jul
mirage10–13-0.006%8 Jul
cache13–110.0123%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.049%3 Jul
ancient13–50.038%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.090%28 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0414%27 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0817%27 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0512%6 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0630%4 Jun
overpass14–160.0018%4 Jun
mirage12–120.0211%3 Jun
cache9–13-0.069%3 Jun
inferno10–13-0.049%2 Jun
inferno2–13-0.028%27 May
cache13–90.029%23 May
mirage10–13-0.0719%23 May
mirage6–13-0.0325%16 May
cache13–10-0.0013%15 May
office12–120.030%15 May
cache8–13-0.0810%13 May
office13–70.016%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →