Cornbread

Cornbread — CS2 Stats

GM76561198866795070[U:1:906529342]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,407Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,249Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#47742 of 260028 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,934 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,666 +3,927 29 May – 29 Sept · 29 days played
17,70722,666peak 22,66629 May29 Sept
22,666Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,934Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-05-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,934
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate61.1%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy8.2%12.7%13.0%4.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.711.051.06above
Match win rate48.0%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCornbreadFACEITLevel 7 · 1,934 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,934csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning54
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–55Last 10045%Win rateLLLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.4
Utility6.9
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time521ms−96ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 5 Jun →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 29 May →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · inferno, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L6Current streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 25nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2515–1060%0.00
ancientC228–1436%0.01
infernoC145–936%-0.00
nukeD103–730%-0.01
cacheC94–544%-0.00
anubisC94–544%0.01
dust2B84–450%-0.00
overpass—21–150%-0.03
boulder—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

135,680Lifetime kills
1.71K/D · Top 5% of Level 7 players
4,485Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
61.1%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 7 players
8.2%Shot accuracy
8,418MVPs
2,167Hours (in match)
3,323Bombs planted
1,249Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4773,566
AWP8,075
MP92,270
FAMAS2,016
Negev1,440

Lifetime map wins

4,718inferno
4,716nuke
3,271vertigo
2,076dust2
695office
540cbble
484train
64lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

540Matches
50%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
79.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19954%1.3116.6
Anubis7351%1.1915.6
Ancient6335%1.1016.4
Inferno6360%1.1115.4
Nuke4945%1.1915.7
Vertigo3563%1.2517.2
Dust22442%0.8612.1
Overpass1136%1.1415.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
519msReaction time
33.7%T opening success
52.5%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
12.21HE damage / grenade
14.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.7283% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0622%4 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0627%2 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0319%28 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0124%27 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0315%22 Oct →
mirage12–160.0033%18 Oct →
ancient13–00.0412%29 Sept →
cache8–130.0427%28 Sept →
anubis13–20.1113%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0132%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0519%24 Sept →
ancient13–110.0328%19 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0527%19 Sept →
cache13–30.0038%16 Sept →
mirage6–130.0128%6 Sept →
ancient11–130.0019%6 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0123%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0230%30 Aug →
ancient11–130.0626%30 Aug →
anubis13–80.0123%30 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0114%30 Aug →
inferno10–130.0527%30 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0316%29 Aug →
ancient13–80.0023%29 Aug →
mirage19–16-0.0220%28 Aug →
ancient16–120.0417%25 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0127%25 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0024%24 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0219%24 Aug →
mirage14–160.0127%24 Aug →
ancient16–130.0120%22 Aug →
mirage13–70.0317%21 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0316%11 Aug →
mirage13–100.0319%8 Aug →
boulder13–10-0.0224%8 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0119%8 Aug →
cache7–130.0320%6 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0922%6 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0228%6 Aug →
mirage16–140.0019%5 Aug →
anubis10–130.0117%5 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0123%3 Aug →
mirage11–130.0018%2 Aug →
mirage13–80.0125%2 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0511%30 Jul →
inferno13–80.0133%30 Jul →
dust213–100.0825%30 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0519%30 Jul →
mirage13–20.0519%29 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0317%28 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0416%28 Jul →
ancient4–130.0822%28 Jul →
mirage10–130.0019%27 Jul →
ancient5–130.0023%27 Jul →
ancient9–130.0016%26 Jul →
cache13–11-0.019%25 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0126%24 Jul →
mirage13–70.0128%23 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0822%23 Jul →
inferno13–50.0723%16 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0316%15 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0418%13 Jul →
ancient13–110.0318%12 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0522%12 Jul →
cache5–130.0231%12 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0122%12 Jul →
cache16–120.0220%12 Jul →
mirage13–90.0115%11 Jul →
ancient13–90.0216%4 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0012%4 Jul →
ancient9–130.0534%2 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.1025%2 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0130%1 Jul →
cache11–13-0.067%1 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0019%26 Jun →
cache11–130.0120%23 Jun →
overpass13–16-0.0031%23 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0527%22 Jun →
mirage12–16-0.0311%17 Jun →
mirage13–50.0316%17 Jun →
inferno6–130.0119%16 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0333%15 Jun →
ancient10–130.0025%15 Jun →
mirage13–40.0420%15 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0522%14 Jun →
anubis13–110.0525%14 Jun →
mirage13–110.0119%12 Jun →
anubis13–110.0615%12 Jun →
overpass13–8-0.0524%11 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.0117%11 Jun →
dust20–2-0.050%10 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.046%10 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0319%5 Jun →
dust213–100.1344%5 Jun →
anubis9–130.0313%4 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0319%3 Jun →
nuke13–20.0321%3 Jun →
ancient13–20.0718%2 Jun →
inferno13–110.0829%29 May →
nuke13–8-0.0146%29 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.