Evil_Julius

Evil_Julius — CS2 Stats

76561198853046669[U:1:892780941]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

233Tracked matches61%Win rate2023Tracked since
569Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,395Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8005 of 14007 tracked
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate36.3%48.1%11.8% short
Shot accuracy5.9%12.9%7.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.080.13 short
Match win rate48.3%46.5%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEvil_JuliusPREMIER17,395 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning52
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63316Last 10063%Win rateLWLLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression6.1
Utility2.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.7

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.2
Utility2.6
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time474ms−96ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 474ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 11.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–7
132Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 56% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27171063%0.05
ancientS2013765%0.03
dust2A1810856%0.02
nukeS1510567%0.06
infernoA95456%0.02
anubisS64267%0.03
cache43175%0.05
vertigo110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (56% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

10,007Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
716Matches
48.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
36.3%Headshot %
5.9%Shot accuracy
1,449MVPs
227Hours (in match)
901Bombs planted
150Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,084nuke
961inferno
756dust2
280vertigo
52office
50italy
32assault
22militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
70.2%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
491msReaction time
45.0%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
15.97HE damage / grenade
0.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2706 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.7691% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0012%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.090%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0815%22 Aug
dust27–13-0.0516%22 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0115%17 Aug
vertigo13–110.0831%15 Aug
mirage13–100.0217%14 Aug
ancient13–100.0111%13 Aug
ancient13–60.019%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.036%11 Aug
ancient15–150.0115%10 Aug
mirage13–90.0320%10 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0718%10 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0213%10 Aug
dust26–130.0424%10 Aug
mirage13–30.1315%10 Aug
mirage15–150.0424%9 Aug
anubis5–130.0318%9 Aug
nuke8–130.0522%9 Aug
cache13–20.0513%8 Aug
ancient13–50.0824%8 Aug
inferno13–20.0710%8 Aug
ancient0–4-0.0125%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0824%8 Aug
mirage13–30.1013%8 Aug
ancient13–60.1310%8 Aug
dust213–70.0325%8 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0024%8 Aug
cache13–50.0523%8 Aug
dust213–40.0820%7 Aug
nuke13–40.0911%7 Aug
mirage13–100.0217%6 Aug
inferno13–30.0214%6 Aug
cache13–70.1620%6 Aug
dust210–130.0620%6 Aug
anubis13–70.1018%6 Aug
ancient13–70.0710%5 Aug
anubis13–30.0716%5 Aug
mirage13–100.0214%5 Aug
mirage13–50.1027%4 Aug
ancient13–110.0719%4 Aug
mirage14–160.0722%4 Aug
mirage16–130.0718%3 Aug
cache3–13-0.057%3 Aug
inferno13–110.1020%3 Aug
anubis13–80.065%3 Aug
inferno7–90.0512%3 Aug
dust23–130.0037%2 Aug
dust213–60.0618%2 Aug
ancient13–30.039%2 Aug
mirage13–40.0715%1 Aug
mirage1–6-0.0312%1 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0110%1 Aug
anubis13–60.0213%1 Aug
dust214–160.0313%1 Aug
nuke13–110.1412%31 Jul
ancient15–150.0516%31 Jul
mirage15–150.0916%31 Jul
mirage13–70.0310%30 Jul
nuke13–40.1012%30 Jul
nuke13–50.0613%30 Jul
ancient13–50.098%30 Jul
inferno7–130.0316%28 Jul
inferno13–11-0.057%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0313%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0211%27 Jul
dust213–5-0.0225%27 Jul
mirage13–80.0211%27 Jul
ancient13–50.139%27 Jul
ancient13–60.049%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0220%26 Jul
dust213–60.0314%26 Jul
nuke13–60.0619%26 Jul
dust216–13-0.0313%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0210%26 Jul
nuke14–160.0719%26 Jul
mirage13–40.076%26 Jul
nuke10–130.078%25 Jul
mirage15–150.0610%25 Jul
dust213–110.0214%25 Jul
ancient13–110.1011%25 Jul
dust213–5-0.0116%25 Jul
mirage15–150.136%25 Jul
nuke7–130.0214%25 Jul
nuke5–130.036%25 Jul
mirage9–130.068%24 Jul
dust29–13-0.027%24 Jul
nuke13–50.1111%24 Jul
nuke13–60.027%24 Jul
ancient16–120.038%24 Jul
inferno13–11-0.046%24 Jul
dust214–160.1114%24 Jul
dust213–90.0721%23 Jul
ancient12–4-0.0414%23 Jul
nuke13–11-0.046%23 Jul
nuke13–70.0915%23 Jul
mirage13–80.0815%23 Jul
mirage13–70.029%23 Jul
dust213–8-0.0614%22 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0319%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →