𝑳 𝑽 ™ — CS2 Stats

US76561198846308252[U:1:886042524]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,873Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,659Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating3.6 LearningHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating7,686Light Blue band · top ~66% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#35208 of 47217 tracked

WingmanSilver IV

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

7,686Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 7,686
Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,314 to go
Reached: Light Blue band
Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Light Blue band median	Blue band median	vs Blue band
Headshot rate	31.2%	39.7%	41.4%	10.3% short
Shot accuracy	0.2%	6.7%	9.0%	8.8% short
Kill/death ratio	0.98	0.91	0.97	meets
Match win rate	44.7%	42.1%	43.7%	above

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning44

Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression4.5

Utility1.0

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning4.4

Utility1.0

Mechanics2.4

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time609ms+20ms

first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms

Headshot accuracy11.3%−1.7%

first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 11.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–10

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 35% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	23	8–15	35%	0.00
dust2	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.00
nuke	S	17	11–6	65%	0.02
inferno	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.02
anubis	S	12	8–4	67%	-0.01
ancient	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00
cache	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,844Lifetime kills

0.98K/D · Top 50% of Light Blue band

2,101Matches

44.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Light Blue band

31.2%Headshot %

0.2%Shot accuracy

4,663MVPs

807Hours (in match)

2,683Bombs planted

439Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Negev14,746

AWP3,667

M4A4 / M4A1-S3,664

AK-473,536

P2000 / USP-S2,136

Glock-181,924

Galil AR1,220

MP7712

FAMAS610

MAC-10464

Lifetime map wins

5,566dust2

3,653nuke

2,567inferno

639train

283vertigo

41office

1cbble

1safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches

50%Win rate

0.81Avg K/D

81.0ADR

16%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	1	0%	0.50	7.0
Cache	1	100%	1.12	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.1%Headshot accuracy

40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.1%Spray accuracy

60.6%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

601msReaction time

31.3%T opening success

37.6%CT opening success

0.24Enemies flashed / flash

3.5%Flash assists

3.95HE damage / grenade

0.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.0789% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2419 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.282% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	6–13	0.02	11%	25 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.09	9%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	16%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	12%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	13%	23 Aug →
nuke	3–9	-0.13	7%	23 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.05	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.02	20%	23 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	11%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	16%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	12%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	12%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	5%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	7%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	9%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.01	2%	22 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.00	9%	22 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.07	8%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.09	7%	20 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	19%	19 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	12%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.04	17%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	10%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.08	11%	17 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.03	10%	17 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	9%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	11%	16 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.09	14%	16 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.00	11%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	13%	15 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.07	9%	15 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.07	13%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	8%	15 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	15%	15 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	7%	11 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.07	17%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.01	10%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	12%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	9%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	18%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	10%	10 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.08	17%	10 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.01	10%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.06	8%	9 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	21%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.01	9%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.07	9%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.08	7%	9 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	14%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	6%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	12%	9 Aug →
inferno	2–9	-0.08	13%	8 Aug →
inferno	1–9	-0.07	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	14%	8 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	10%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.02	11%	8 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	9%	8 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	9%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	11%	8 Aug →
ancient	0–13	0.01	10%	8 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	4%	8 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	12%	7 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	6%	7 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	12%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	33%	7 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.02	14%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	10%	6 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	14%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	7%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.06	8%	6 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	11%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.10	15%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.08	19%	5 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.03	4%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.06	10%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	19%	5 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	18%	5 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.10	5%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.07	10%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	17%	5 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	6%	5 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.01	21%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.10	18%	5 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.04	10%	5 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	10%	5 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	16%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	17%	4 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.00	7%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	18%	4 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.04	15%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	14%	3 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	8%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.02	14%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.01	10%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	7%	3 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	6%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.11	16%	2 Aug →