Limpan ッ — CS2 Stats

76561198838321898[U:1:878056170]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,249Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,326Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13368 of 52060 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning61

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLLLWWWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression9.1

Utility3.9

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels4.9

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.1

Utility3.9

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels4.9

Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time562ms−46ms

first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–0Biggest win — vertigo

4Longest win streak

L3Current streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 25% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	27	12–15	44%	0.02
mirage	B	22	10–12	45%	0.03
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	0.02
ancient	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.01
vertigo	A	11	6–5	55%	0.02
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	0.03
nuke	—	4	3–1	75%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,169Matches

53%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

86.2ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	66	48%	1.19	17.7
Dust2	51	51%	1.22	18.0
Inferno	30	60%	1.38	18.1
Ancient	28	54%	1.17	16.3
Cache	28	54%	1.32	19.6
Nuke	24	58%	1.35	16.5
Overpass	14	43%	0.98	15.5
Anubis	12	50%	1.20	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy

37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

84.4%Counter-strafing

6.7°Preaim

558msReaction time

50.0%T opening success

49.2%CT opening success

0.44Enemies flashed / flash

4.7%Flash assists

10.48HE damage / grenade

3.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.444 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	5–13	-0.01	19%	30 Aug →
vertigo	6–13	0.03	17%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.01	25%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.06	26%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	20%	29 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.17	33%	26 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.03	22%	26 Aug →
anubis	12–12	0.06	17%	26 Aug →
vertigo	13–0	0.02	26%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.00	22%	26 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.00	23%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	14%	26 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.09	17%	25 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	0.02	14%	24 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.03	25%	24 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	23%	23 Aug →
vertigo	2–13	-0.02	27%	23 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	24%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	20%	23 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	23%	22 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	0.06	18%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.06	18%	22 Aug →
vertigo	19–16	0.04	15%	22 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.03	13%	21 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.10	19%	21 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.00	27%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	21%	21 Aug →
vertigo	19–16	0.07	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	30%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	27%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.06	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	27%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	16%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.00	10%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	18%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	20%	19 Aug →
vertigo	16–19	0.02	24%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.09	23%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.04	20%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.10	28%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.02	21%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	9%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.07	25%	19 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.04	17%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	20%	19 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.02	32%	18 Aug →
dust2	20–22	0.03	19%	18 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	18%	18 Aug →
mirage	19–17	0.05	15%	18 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	20%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	23%	18 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.03	20%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	9%	17 Aug →
vertigo	22–20	-0.01	17%	17 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.02	20%	16 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.07	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	12%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	22%	14 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.08	17%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.21	20%	14 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.06	21%	14 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.09	23%	13 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.05	18%	13 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	21%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	16%	11 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	26%	11 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.08	39%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	41%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	19%	10 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.06	10%	8 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	21%	7 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.00	22%	6 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	13%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	26%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	18%	30 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.00	24%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	15%	30 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	23%	29 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	9%	29 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.09	17%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.06	37%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.05	24%	27 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.05	23%	27 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.02	26%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.15	34%	27 Jul →
dust2	22–19	0.05	24%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.09	12%	26 Jul →
mirage	19–16	0.02	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	32%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.05	22%	22 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.04	25%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	11%	21 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.02	22%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	12%	19 Jul →