𝖼𝗁𝗎𝗉𝗂𝗉𝗎𝗋 — CS2 Stats

SG76561198445446620[U:1:485180892]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,416Tracked matches90%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player

Premier CS Rating32,432Top 1% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersGold band · top ~0.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#25 of 260000 tracked

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 32,432 +5,475 29 Aug – 3 Nov · 31 days played

Faceit ELO: 2,059 +0 29 Aug – 6 Oct · 10 observations

32,654Peak Premier in tracked matches

2,059Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

28Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,059
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 441 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 32,432
+5,362 over 30 days · improving
Reached: Gold band · Red band · Pink band · Purple band
Red band first seen 2026-08-29
Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning48

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT85–14–1Last 10085%Win rateWWWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

5–0 · 100% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

10–0 · 100% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

17–3 · 85% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.4

Utility4.3

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.9

Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.8

Utility4.3

Mechanics5.2

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04

Reaction time549ms−42ms

first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms

Headshot accuracy16.2%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 18 Oct →

46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 15 Oct →

328msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · cache, 18 Oct →

13–0Biggest win · anubis, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

26Longest win streak

W13Current streak

4–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 8infernoWeakest map · 64% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	S	27	22–5	81%	-0.04
cache	S	18	15–3	83%	-0.03
mirage	S	17	15–2	88%	-0.03
nuke	S	11	10–1	91%	0.01
inferno	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.02
anubis	S	8	8–0	100%	-0.05
ancient	S	7	7–0	100%	-0.03
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (64% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

796Matches

66%Win rate

0.78Avg K/D

51.7ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

13%1v2 clutch win

36Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	86	60%	0.61	8.9
Dust2	77	64%	0.64	8.4
Mirage	58	55%	0.60	8.2
Nuke	47	74%	0.81	10.0
Inferno	37	68%	0.70	9.4
Overpass	22	82%	0.75	10.6
Anubis	14	64%	0.66	8.6
Vertigo	2	50%	0.30	4.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy

31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.9%Spray accuracy

73.6%Counter-strafing

12.4°Preaim

539msReaction time

37.6%T opening success

36.7%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

2.9%Flash assists

7.09HE damage / grenade

6.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.372° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4511 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–11	-0.04	30%	3 Nov →
anubis	13–10	-0.06	12%	3 Nov →
ancient	13–2	-0.03	12%	1 Nov →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	7%	1 Nov →
nuke	13–6	0.01	20%	1 Nov →
anubis	13–7	-0.10	10%	1 Nov →
nuke	13–3	0.00	25%	1 Nov →
dust2	13–1	-0.03	26%	1 Nov →
dust2	13–7	-0.09	21%	1 Nov →
mirage	13–3	-0.00	14%	1 Nov →
inferno	13–3	-0.10	12%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	15%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.08	17%	31 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.09	27%	30 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.09	19%	30 Oct →
inferno	13–3	-0.00	29%	30 Oct →
cache	9–13	-0.05	21%	30 Oct →
anubis	13–0	-0.02	14%	30 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.02	24%	30 Oct →
anubis	13–5	0.05	14%	30 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.06	10%	30 Oct →
mirage	13–1	-0.02	21%	30 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	29%	30 Oct →
office	13–9	0.01	18%	29 Oct →
ancient	13–4	-0.06	16%	28 Oct →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	9%	28 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.07	13%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.05	16%	25 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.02	13%	25 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.02	14%	25 Oct →
dust2	13–3	-0.06	8%	24 Oct →
cache	7–0	-0.02	0%	24 Oct →
anubis	13–7	-0.10	0%	24 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.05	14%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	5%	23 Oct →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	18%	23 Oct →
ancient	13–4	-0.05	9%	23 Oct →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	16%	23 Oct →
mirage	13–1	-0.02	8%	23 Oct →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	11%	23 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	28%	23 Oct →
cache	13–8	0.01	34%	22 Oct →
cache	13–2	-0.07	22%	22 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.08	14%	21 Oct →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	21%	21 Oct →
mirage	13–4	0.03	19%	21 Oct →
cache	13–2	-0.00	20%	21 Oct →
mirage	13–3	0.00	22%	21 Oct →
mirage	13–7	-0.07	16%	20 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.00	27%	20 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.07	10%	20 Oct →
mirage	13–1	0.01	10%	20 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.02	26%	20 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.00	18%	19 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.07	5%	19 Oct →
cache	13–5	0.00	18%	19 Oct →
nuke	13–3	0.08	2%	18 Oct →
inferno	13–4	0.00	26%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–0	-0.03	28%	18 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.05	10%	18 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.02	11%	18 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.01	21%	18 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	17%	18 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	23%	17 Oct →
inferno	7–13	0.03	25%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–4	-0.02	17%	16 Oct →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	20%	16 Oct →
cache	13–5	-0.08	22%	16 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	20%	16 Oct →
cache	13–3	0.06	16%	16 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	15%	15 Oct →
anubis	13–1	-0.01	22%	15 Oct →
nuke	13–4	0.03	46%	15 Oct →
cache	15–15	-0.08	10%	14 Oct →
ancient	13–1	-0.07	21%	14 Oct →
nuke	13–7	0.01	14%	13 Oct →
dust2	13–3	-0.02	9%	13 Oct →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	5%	11 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	23%	11 Oct →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	7%	9 Oct →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	23%	7 Oct →
inferno	13–1	0.06	10%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	13%	7 Oct →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	19%	5 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.10	6%	5 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	2%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–1	0.01	11%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.02	19%	5 Oct →
mirage	13–5	-0.06	13%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–3	-0.05	18%	3 Oct →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	14%	3 Oct →
cache	13–2	-0.02	8%	3 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	13%	3 Oct →
dust2	11–5	-0.08	0%	1 Oct →
nuke	8–1	0.02	8%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	14%	29 Sept →
mirage	13–2	-0.05	11%	27 Sept →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	19%	27 Sept →
inferno	3–13	-0.10	18%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	20%	27 Sept →