nathan buckle

nathan buckle — CS2 Stats

IL76561198423663965[U:1:463398237]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,402Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,766Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate74.1%44.2%44.9%above
Shot accuracy3.1%11.2%11.8%8.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.491.041.04above
Match win rate32.5%45.3%45.3%12.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnathan buckleFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning43
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43534Last 10043%Win rateLLWWLLWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression5.8
Utility3.9
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch0.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.3
Utility3.9
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time668ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 668ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 13–1
131Biggest win — vertigo
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 55% over 11ancientWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC156940%0.00
ancientC135838%-0.01
vertigoA116555%-0.01
nukeB115645%-0.00
dust2B115645%-0.02
infernoC104640%-0.04
anubisC73443%-0.00
italy43175%-0.05
golden42250%-0.02
alpine31233%0.01
stronghold32167%-0.01
cache21150%-0.01
boulder1010%-0.01
poseidon1010%-0.01
office1010%-0.05
warden1010%-0.05
palacio1010%-0.05
agency1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

132,532Lifetime kills
1.49K/D · Top 5% of Level 5 players
3,185Matches
32.5%Match win rate
74.1%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 5 players
3.1%Shot accuracy
4,980MVPs
2,397Hours (in match)
1,584Bombs planted
556Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,321dust2
1,893inferno
1,772nuke
1,747vertigo
495train
383office
125italy
110cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
82.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage956%1.1617.3
Dust2520%0.9612.6
Anubis450%0.9515.8
Ancient333%1.4720.0
Inferno333%0.7612.3
Nuke3100%1.2915.3
Vertigo2100%1.1617.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
666msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
61.7%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
7.89HE damage / grenade
5.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4297 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2716% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo9–130.0116%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0213%22 Aug
vertigo13–10.0424%22 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0221%21 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0215%17 Aug
cache6–13-0.006%12 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0420%12 Jul
boulder12–12-0.016%10 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0217%10 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0323%8 Jul
nuke11–13-0.035%5 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0535%5 Jul
dust26–13-0.0913%4 Jul
nuke13–60.0824%3 Jul
anubis13–80.0925%3 Jul
anubis13–50.0322%1 Jul
nuke13–40.0923%1 Jul
dust213–80.0016%30 Jun
dust213–9-0.0517%20 Jun
ancient13–80.0122%18 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0219%12 Jun
ancient16–140.0123%11 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0411%11 Jun
dust213–40.0422%11 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0523%9 Jun
dust211–13-0.0011%9 Jun
ancient13–20.0716%8 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0120%6 Jun
mirage9–130.0414%6 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0327%4 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0221%3 Jun
cache13–10-0.0213%2 Jun
dust210–130.0218%10 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.1114%3 Apr
vertigo13–90.0128%23 Mar
anubis10–130.0015%22 Mar
vertigo13–40.029%22 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0615%22 Mar
ancient9–130.0320%22 Mar
poseidon8–8-0.0120%22 Mar
dust28–13-0.0519%1 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0413%1 Mar
nuke13–160.0627%1 Mar
nuke10–130.0022%24 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0818%23 Feb
mirage2–0-0.120%23 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0523%23 Feb
mirage13–80.0021%23 Feb
mirage13–100.0824%21 Feb
vertigo13–80.0218%20 Feb
italy13–5-0.0410%19 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0324%19 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0125%17 Feb
ancient13–90.0115%17 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0016%17 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0122%17 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0421%17 Feb
mirage13–10.1728%17 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0413%15 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0017%15 Feb
vertigo10–130.0320%15 Feb
dust213–5-0.0118%15 Feb
office5–13-0.0523%15 Feb
vertigo13–110.0019%1 Feb
vertigo5–13-0.0216%31 Jan
vertigo8–2-0.1017%31 Jan
alpine5–130.0218%31 Jan
stronghold7–13-0.0511%25 Jan
warden3–13-0.0512%25 Jan
alpine13–80.0312%25 Jan
stronghold13–8-0.0217%25 Jan
alpine7–13-0.029%24 Jan
stronghold13–30.0421%24 Jan
palacio9–13-0.0512%18 Jan
italy3–13-0.0614%18 Jan
golden6–13-0.0420%18 Jan
agency1–13-0.0515%18 Jan
italy13–8-0.0712%8 Jan
vertigo10–13-0.0310%8 Jan
italy13–4-0.0425%8 Jan
golden13–11-0.0416%7 Jan
mirage11–130.0615%7 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0216%6 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0321%3 Jan
inferno3–13-0.1011%3 Jan
golden3–13-0.016%2 Jan
golden13–50.0220%2 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0520%9 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0320%7 Dec
inferno13–8-0.0519%7 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0712%6 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0215%6 Dec
dust214–16-0.078%4 Dec
inferno13–10-0.0411%4 Dec
mirage8–13-0.036%3 Dec
dust213–60.0213%3 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0424%3 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0214%3 Dec
dust211–130.0124%3 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0615%2 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →