ikki — CS2 Stats

76561198364984562[U:1:404718834]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,609Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,387 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning66

Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–55Last 10045%Win rateLLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression8.2

Utility3.6

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels4.6

Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning6.6

Utility3.6

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels4.6

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time525ms−2ms

first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms

Headshot accuracy22.4%+2.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–8

13–2Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 12anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	34	14–20	41%	0.00
dust2	B	22	11–11	50%	0.00
cache	A	12	7–5	58%	0.01
ancient	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.03
anubis	D	10	3–7	30%	0.02
nuke	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01
inferno	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,918Matches

51%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

81.6ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	442	51%	1.24	17.5
Dust2	286	49%	1.18	17.4
Ancient	178	52%	1.12	16.9
Inferno	156	54%	1.16	17.0
Anubis	143	46%	1.16	17.0
Overpass	127	57%	1.32	18.6
Nuke	97	49%	1.17	16.5
Vertigo	47	40%	1.14	16.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.6%Spray accuracy

77.6%Counter-strafing

7.4°Preaim

531msReaction time

37.7%T opening success

58.9%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

8.2%Flash assists

6.24HE damage / grenade

3.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4306 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.68% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	10–13	-0.00	11%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	27%	27 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	19%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.00	19%	26 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.07	28%	26 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.06	34%	26 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	28%	26 Aug →
mirage	23–25	0.04	29%	25 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	15%	25 Aug →
ancient	16–19	-0.04	21%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	29%	25 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	16%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	22%	25 Aug →
dust2	16–19	0.05	18%	24 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.01	24%	24 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.13	31%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	20%	23 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	18%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.04	36%	23 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.09	13%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.05	14%	22 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	38%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	14%	21 Aug →
cache	19–15	0.02	19%	21 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	19%	20 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	18%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.06	28%	20 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.01	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	30%	19 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	6%	19 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	28%	18 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	27%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	0%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	23%	15 Aug →
ancient	1–8	-0.06	12%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	29%	15 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	9%	14 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	17%	14 Aug →
mirage	20–22	-0.02	19%	13 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	11%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.09	10%	12 Aug →
anubis	16–12	0.05	29%	12 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	21%	12 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.05	18%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	23%	12 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	27%	12 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.02	7%	12 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	21%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	16%	12 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.09	8%	12 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.01	27%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	41%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	26%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	7%	10 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.05	14%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	3%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	10%	8 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	8%	8 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	10%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	12%	8 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	15%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.09	28%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	16%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	9%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.09	8%	6 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	27%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	28%	6 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	13%	6 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	31%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	13%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	32%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	13%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.05	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	12%	5 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.02	17%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	17%	5 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	37%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	21%	3 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.02	18%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.10	21%	3 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	11%	3 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.03	22%	2 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	7%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	22%	1 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	21%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.14	28%	1 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.03	13%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	33%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.11	14%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	23%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	24%	31 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.05	27%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	27%	31 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	18%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.06	25%	31 Jul →