✪ Avid

✪ Avid — CS2 Stats

CA76561198362839820[U:1:402574092]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,530Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,473Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57886 of 232115 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 6,530 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 8 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,473 -313 9 Aug17 Sept · 14 days played
19,88721,786peak 21,7869 Aug17 Sept
21,786Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-08-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 313 below peak (21,786)
  • +1,362 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,527 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ AvidFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,473 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning48
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52453Last 10052%Win rateWWLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time596ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 15 Sept
44%Best headshot accuracy · 6–2 · train, 15 Sept
453msFastest reaction time · 8–12 · office, 4 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A25141156%-0.00
cacheB147750%-0.00
infernoB147750%0.00
nukeC146843%0.01
ancientC125742%-0.01
mirageA116555%0.03
anubisS54180%0.02
office21150%0.00
vertigo21150%0.02
train110100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,301Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.5ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis26954%1.0516.0
Mirage24648%1.0214.8
Inferno22657%1.0714.9
Ancient15451%0.9414.3
Vertigo13043%0.9615.2
Dust28844%0.9914.4
Nuke8243%1.0715.9
Overpass4040%1.0014.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
590msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.44HE damage / grenade
13.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.5845% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–50.0617%15 Sept
mirage13–40.0414%15 Sept
cache6–13-0.0019%15 Sept
train6–20.1144%15 Sept
mirage13–60.1321%15 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0115%8 Sept
dust213–9-0.0317%8 Sept
cache10–130.0018%8 Sept
nuke16–140.0219%8 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0015%8 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0317%8 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0320%8 Sept
dust213–9-0.0412%7 Sept
cache13–50.0915%7 Sept
dust211–13-0.0425%7 Sept
dust213–80.0127%7 Sept
nuke19–15-0.0320%7 Sept
cache16–130.0115%7 Sept
dust26–13-0.0415%7 Sept
dust213–5-0.0312%7 Sept
anubis13–60.0713%6 Sept
inferno10–130.0124%6 Sept
dust213–70.0314%6 Sept
ancient13–8-0.048%6 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0615%6 Sept
nuke2–130.0121%6 Sept
nuke5–130.0316%6 Sept
dust27–130.0410%6 Sept
ancient16–19-0.049%6 Sept
dust211–13-0.0114%5 Sept
dust213–20.118%5 Sept
inferno13–60.0217%5 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0322%5 Sept
inferno16–140.0823%5 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0220%5 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0415%4 Sept
dust213–11-0.0621%4 Sept
inferno13–90.0318%4 Sept
office13–70.0226%4 Sept
office8–12-0.0120%4 Sept
nuke8–130.0122%3 Sept
ancient13–100.0520%2 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0219%29 Aug
ancient13–50.0217%29 Aug
dust213–20.1017%24 Aug
ancient9–130.0725%23 Aug
dust24–130.0115%23 Aug
dust213–30.0018%23 Aug
dust210–130.019%23 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1025%23 Aug
cache6–13-0.0810%23 Aug
dust29–130.0027%23 Aug
cache13–6-0.0318%23 Aug
cache9–130.0013%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0835%22 Aug
dust212–120.0325%22 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0317%17 Aug
anubis13–70.0220%17 Aug
mirage13–60.0913%17 Aug
dust213–70.0415%17 Aug
dust23–1-0.030%17 Aug
ancient13–60.0118%17 Aug
cache13–8-0.0312%17 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0334%17 Aug
mirage13–40.0217%17 Aug
nuke14–160.0221%16 Aug
ancient11–130.0139%16 Aug
cache13–70.0319%16 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0517%16 Aug
inferno13–30.0522%16 Aug
cache7–13-0.049%16 Aug
vertigo13–70.0217%16 Aug
dust211–130.0226%16 Aug
cache16–12-0.0212%16 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0118%15 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0411%13 Aug
nuke7–130.0130%11 Aug
inferno13–16-0.059%11 Aug
anubis13–90.0118%11 Aug
anubis13–50.0315%11 Aug
nuke13–60.0522%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0612%11 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0115%11 Aug
mirage9–130.1016%10 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0311%10 Aug
inferno10–130.0619%10 Aug
cache10–13-0.0131%10 Aug
cache11–130.0621%9 Aug
cache13–100.0013%9 Aug
mirage10–130.1313%9 Aug
dust219–17-0.0020%9 Aug
vertigo10–130.0116%9 Aug
dust213–3-0.0336%9 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0413%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0714%9 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0120%9 Aug
dust222–18-0.0416%9 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0220%8 Aug
nuke13–50.0327%8 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0017%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →