One Man Boosting service — CS2 Stats

76561198354931825[U:1:394666097]

616Tracked matches42%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,769Hours in CS48Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,072Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9928 of 28122 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate45.3%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy16.2%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.140.990.99above
Match win rate51.2%43.9%44.2%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOne Man Boosting serviceFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER21,072 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning46
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY424711Last 10042%Win rateWLWTLWTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression5.4
Utility4.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact2.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time566ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 9–1
131Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 55% over 20dust2Weakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21111052%0.01
infernoA2011955%0.02
dust2D1741324%-0.03
ancientC145936%0.04
nukeB136746%0.02
anubisB63350%0.00
overpass32167%0.01
vertigo2020%-0.06
cache2020%-0.01
train1010%-0.06
office1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

66,666Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 3 players
3,963Matches
51.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 3 players
45.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
15,227MVPs
1,172Hours (in match)
4,749Bombs planted
1,263Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,853
AWP5,286
SSG 083,544
Negev3,191
MP92,304
MAC-101,284

Lifetime map wins

5,924lake
4,304inferno
2,978dust2
1,039train
995nuke
603vertigo
180office
125cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches
62%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
88.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
43%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2367%1.1112.3
Mirage20%1.3219.5
Ancient10%1.0011.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
535msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
52.6%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
8.73HE damage / grenade
8.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4796 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8649% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–40.0623%27 Aug
ancient6–130.1718%27 Aug
inferno9–30.0225%26 Aug
nuke8–80.0512%26 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0513%26 Aug
inferno9–50.1021%26 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0023%23 Aug
ancient5–130.1116%23 Aug
mirage3–40.0910%23 Aug
ancient13–110.0515%22 Aug
mirage13–70.0116%22 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0216%22 Aug
nuke13–60.0322%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0425%22 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0833%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0123%21 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0630%21 Aug
inferno13–20.0936%21 Aug
nuke13–50.0637%21 Aug
train4–13-0.0630%21 Aug
inferno13–110.0619%20 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0614%20 Aug
nuke13–40.1434%20 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0416%20 Aug
ancient13–40.0626%20 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0317%20 Aug
inferno8–80.0527%20 Aug
inferno6–90.0015%20 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0122%18 Aug
overpass8–80.0515%18 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2310%18 Aug
inferno9–40.1043%18 Aug
inferno9–10.1821%18 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0422%18 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0323%18 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0111%18 Aug
ancient8–130.0416%18 Aug
ancient12–120.0318%17 Aug
ancient12–120.0010%17 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0328%16 Aug
inferno8–80.0714%16 Aug
dust213–8-0.0223%15 Aug
ancient12–120.0230%14 Aug
mirage13–90.0816%14 Aug
mirage13–70.0625%13 Aug
cache7–13-0.0017%13 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0311%12 Aug
anubis3–100.0131%11 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0210%11 Aug
nuke13–110.0428%11 Aug
dust213–6-0.0622%11 Aug
dust23–13-0.120%9 Aug
ancient13–100.0216%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0619%8 Aug
dust213–70.0110%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.0113%7 Aug
ancient13–10-0.059%7 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0210%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.0332%7 Aug
nuke13–100.068%6 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0216%6 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0716%6 Aug
dust24–13-0.0328%3 Aug
dust29–130.0734%3 Aug
mirage13–50.0423%1 Aug
mirage0–6-0.0840%29 Jul
office12–12-0.0124%25 Jul
inferno13–50.0614%25 Jul
inferno13–3-0.050%25 Jul
mirage2–130.0027%25 Jul
mirage16–14-0.028%25 Jul
mirage9–00.1043%25 Jul
dust210–13-0.0414%25 Jul
dust29–13-0.0620%25 Jul
dust213–9-0.0114%25 Jul
dust28–13-0.0322%25 Jul
dust20–13-0.0817%25 Jul
inferno13–50.0617%25 Jul
inferno13–110.0033%24 Jul
anubis13–60.0416%23 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0615%24 May
mirage13–6-0.0117%16 May
dust24–10-0.1212%8 May
mirage13–70.0220%5 May
ancient13–16-0.0019%3 May
inferno13–110.0128%25 Apr
ancient7–130.0025%25 Apr
dust28–130.0216%24 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0435%24 Apr
mirage13–10.0815%24 Apr
inferno6–130.0120%22 Apr
nuke13–40.0918%20 Apr
mirage10–130.0227%20 Apr
anubis13–80.0620%19 Apr
mirage11–130.0620%17 Apr
dust215–150.008%15 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0210%15 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0225%14 Apr
overpass13–110.0217%13 Apr
mirage0–13-0.086%10 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →