benjam1n ^v^

benjam1n ^v^ — CS2 Stats

CX76561198345453140[U:1:385187412]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,310Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,660Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23243 of 219961 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 20 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,660 +3,722 20 Jun16 Sept · 29 days played
19,58324,883peak 24,88320 Jun16 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-06-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 223 below peak (24,883)
  • +2,371 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,722 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 340 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbenjam1n ^v^FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,660 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning61
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44533Last 10044%Win rateLLLLWWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.1
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time542ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–2 · debris, 11 Jul
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · vertigo, 8 Sept
352msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 29 Aug
13–0Biggest win · vertigo, 8 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 11mirageWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2281436%-0.01
anubisB2091145%0.00
nukeB178947%-0.01
cacheA116555%0.01
mirageD82625%-0.03
ancientB84450%0.02
vertigoC83538%0.04
overpass43175%-0.01
dust21010%-0.04
debris110100%0.23

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,250Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
67.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis12957%0.9214.0
Ancient10358%1.0215.6
Mirage7743%0.8913.8
Vertigo6055%1.0316.2
Nuke3941%0.9313.8
Inferno2955%0.9213.3
Cache757%0.9212.1
Train650%1.0415.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
538msReaction time
49.9%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
7.24HE damage / grenade
6.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4219 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.2496% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage2–13-0.0621%16 Sept
dust27–13-0.0428%13 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0123%13 Sept
anubis6–130.0413%11 Sept
nuke13–80.0512%11 Sept
ancient13–40.0012%11 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0324%11 Sept
nuke13–70.0712%11 Sept
nuke0–12-0.0625%11 Sept
nuke15–15-0.0417%10 Sept
anubis13–70.0517%10 Sept
anubis8–130.0517%9 Sept
inferno16–130.0520%9 Sept
vertigo13–00.0358%8 Sept
cache7–13-0.058%2 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0313%31 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0410%31 Aug
inferno13–70.0334%30 Aug
anubis13–80.0415%30 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0217%29 Aug
nuke13–40.0639%29 Aug
anubis3–13-0.064%22 Aug
cache13–9-0.0717%21 Aug
vertigo13–70.0716%21 Aug
anubis13–90.0212%20 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0126%18 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0124%18 Aug
inferno2–130.0220%17 Aug
inferno13–100.0118%16 Aug
cache4–130.0611%13 Aug
inferno13–6-0.118%13 Aug
vertigo9–130.0613%10 Aug
anubis7–130.0218%10 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0027%9 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0316%9 Aug
ancient19–16-0.019%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0422%7 Aug
inferno7–130.1019%4 Aug
cache3–13-0.056%4 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0013%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0013%28 Jul
overpass2–13-0.0616%27 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0514%27 Jul
inferno6–9-0.1225%26 Jul
vertigo7–130.0826%25 Jul
cache13–40.048%25 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0516%25 Jul
nuke13–90.0325%25 Jul
mirage13–00.0131%24 Jul
nuke3–13-0.060%23 Jul
anubis13–50.0824%23 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0022%23 Jul
ancient13–60.1518%23 Jul
cache8–130.0411%23 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0327%18 Jul
inferno9–130.0016%18 Jul
cache13–110.0520%18 Jul
cache13–110.0139%18 Jul
anubis13–100.0527%12 Jul
nuke15–150.0514%12 Jul
mirage7–13-0.049%11 Jul
cache2–13-0.0621%11 Jul
debris9–20.2320%11 Jul
mirage0–13-0.1311%11 Jul
cache16–130.0318%10 Jul
cache13–80.0714%10 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0429%10 Jul
ancient11–130.0414%9 Jul
ancient13–90.0213%9 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0017%8 Jul
anubis11–130.0115%8 Jul
overpass13–7-0.0321%8 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0320%7 Jul
vertigo13–20.0416%7 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0330%5 Jul
anubis10–130.0112%5 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0221%4 Jul
inferno5–130.0624%4 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0211%4 Jul
anubis13–50.0315%3 Jul
nuke2–130.0822%3 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0616%3 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0419%3 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0121%2 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0320%2 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0625%1 Jul
overpass13–40.0210%30 Jun
nuke13–90.0023%30 Jun
mirage16–130.0517%30 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0218%29 Jun
anubis5–13-0.094%28 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0416%28 Jun
overpass13–80.0324%28 Jun
vertigo8–130.0417%27 Jun
vertigo4–13-0.0122%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0420%26 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0727%26 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0320%26 Jun
anubis7–13-0.049%25 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0619%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →