laptop gamer

laptop gamer — CS2 Stats

76561198335645063[U:1:375379335]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,985Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,078 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,985 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 20 days played since 17 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,477 +1,805 17 Apr6 May · 11 days played
22,40425,477peak 25,47717 Apr6 May
Faceit ELO: 2,078 +0 2 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
2,0782,078peak 2,0782 Sept18 Sept
25,477Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,078Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-04-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,078
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 422 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlaptop gamerFACEITLevel 10 · 2,078 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,078csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning64
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateLLWLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +49ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.1
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels6.4
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time623ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–13 · cache, 30 Apr
57%Best headshot accuracy · 1–5 · cache, 29 Apr
391msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · mirage, 27 Apr
13–2Biggest win · cache, 29 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA23131057%0.03
dust2C2391439%0.02
ancientD1331023%-0.01
anubisB136746%0.02
cacheA116555%0.05
infernoS86275%0.02
overpassB63350%0.02
nuke220100%0.05
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,812Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
77.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage42652%1.0815.6
Dust218749%1.0515.9
Ancient15751%1.0515.5
Anubis9450%1.0515.9
Inferno8342%1.0515.7
Overpass8354%1.1415.3
Nuke6648%0.9815.2
Train5569%1.2017.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
629msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
9.65HE damage / grenade
11.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5667% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0829%22 May
ancient9–13-0.0131%11 May
mirage13–90.1523%11 May
dust210–130.0116%11 May
cache13–16-0.0633%8 May
dust24–13-0.0623%8 May
dust213–6-0.0329%8 May
dust213–110.0134%6 May
inferno16–120.0026%6 May
ancient13–80.0635%5 May
ancient13–9-0.0122%5 May
mirage11–130.0227%5 May
dust210–130.1020%5 May
mirage13–9-0.0335%5 May
mirage13–11-0.0326%5 May
mirage13–5-0.0326%5 May
overpass13–9-0.0427%5 May
anubis9–130.0320%5 May
cache13–9-0.0620%3 May
dust212–120.1032%3 May
mirage13–70.1429%3 May
mirage5–13-0.0126%2 May
anubis11–130.0718%2 May
dust28–130.1022%2 May
anubis13–110.1227%1 May
dust28–130.0527%1 May
mirage13–90.1120%1 May
inferno13–50.1224%1 May
mirage13–90.1016%1 May
ancient4–13-0.0117%1 May
inferno13–40.0530%1 May
nuke13–80.1032%1 May
dust213–110.0328%1 May
cache13–40.0430%1 May
mirage13–110.0624%1 May
dust210–13-0.0421%30 Apr
anubis13–90.0121%30 Apr
mirage13–60.0315%30 Apr
dust213–50.1029%30 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0710%30 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0411%30 Apr
cache9–130.1728%30 Apr
cache13–70.1226%30 Apr
overpass10–130.0522%29 Apr
cache4–60.0835%29 Apr
cache13–20.1534%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0235%29 Apr
cache13–30.0224%29 Apr
cache1–50.0557%29 Apr
cache13–30.0624%29 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0519%28 Apr
mirage11–130.0028%27 Apr
inferno16–14-0.0314%27 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0713%27 Apr
mirage2–60.000%27 Apr
ancient6–130.0122%27 Apr
mirage3–00.0217%27 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0134%27 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0224%25 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0528%24 Apr
overpass13–70.0724%24 Apr
dust28–13-0.0810%23 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0718%23 Apr
inferno5–13-0.1121%22 Apr
anubis13–60.0522%22 Apr
inferno4–130.0726%22 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0124%22 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0924%22 Apr
dust214–16-0.0220%22 Apr
dust213–70.0222%22 Apr
mirage12–120.0726%21 Apr
dust23–130.1038%21 Apr
ancient13–110.0625%21 Apr
mirage4–130.0123%21 Apr
train10–13-0.0222%20 Apr
ancient8–130.0117%20 Apr
dust213–90.0633%20 Apr
dust217–19-0.0224%20 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0512%19 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0610%19 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0526%19 Apr
anubis13–60.0217%19 Apr
overpass13–80.0516%19 Apr
inferno13–110.0818%19 Apr
dust211–13-0.0318%17 Apr
overpass1–130.0423%17 Apr
anubis3–130.0424%17 Apr
dust24–13-0.0117%17 Apr
mirage13–30.0537%17 Apr
anubis6–130.0925%17 Apr
dust24–130.0229%17 Apr
mirage13–50.1119%17 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0514%17 Apr
anubis2–10.010%17 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0022%17 Apr
dust213–5-0.0228%17 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0610%17 Apr
dust213–60.0620%17 Apr
mirage13–50.1418%17 Apr
dust213–20.1130%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →