El Profesor

El Profesor — CS2 Stats

76561198335084331[U:1:374818603]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,253Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,283Blue band · top ~48.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 766 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 5 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,283 +5,252 6 Jan13 Sept · 13 days played
5,02713,271peak 13,2716 Jan13 Sept
13,332Peak Premier in tracked matches
766Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-01-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 766
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,988 below peak (13,271)
  • +3,063 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,717 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEl ProfesorFACEITLevel 2 · 766 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER11,283 · Blue bandPEAK ELO766csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning46
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49447Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLLLLTT

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −6.5pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time649ms−76ms
first ⅓ avg 725ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–10 · inferno, 20 Jul
63%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · inferno, 5 Jan
438msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 10 May
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 3 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 15ancientWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB30161453%0.01
dust2B30161453%-0.02
mirageA159660%-0.01
ancientD112918%-0.01
cache42250%0.04
anubis41325%-0.04
nuke32167%0.06
eldorado1010%-0.10
overpass110100%-0.06
train1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

446Matches
48%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
63.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust212654%0.7211.6
Inferno11364%0.8812.8
Mirage7432%0.6610.3
Anubis6033%0.7712.1
Ancient4840%0.7212.3
Overpass1136%0.6410.8
Nuke729%0.7411.0
Train4100%0.8112.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
630msReaction time
41.1%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
8.66HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.2744% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke16–12-0.0113%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.116%13 Sept
inferno13–100.0513%13 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0717%13 Sept
cache14–16-0.0616%29 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0111%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.124%28 Aug
anubis6–13-0.093%1 Aug
eldorado8–8-0.1015%1 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0920%1 Aug
anubis10–13-0.059%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.074%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.1119%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0618%26 Jul
inferno2–9-0.0322%26 Jul
inferno15–150.0719%24 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0121%24 Jul
cache12–16-0.0020%23 Jul
dust213–100.0132%23 Jul
ancient7–130.0317%23 Jul
mirage13–50.0938%23 Jul
inferno16–130.0625%23 Jul
cache13–110.1030%23 Jul
mirage13–30.0528%23 Jul
ancient0–70.015%23 Jul
ancient13–80.0717%22 Jul
inferno13–60.0928%20 Jul
dust213–110.0425%20 Jul
inferno13–100.1823%20 Jul
nuke10–130.0817%19 Jul
mirage13–40.1721%19 Jul
ancient10–130.0649%19 Jul
ancient11–130.0916%19 Jul
dust213–40.1020%19 Jul
mirage13–60.1620%19 Jul
dust213–80.1217%19 Jul
nuke13–90.1232%19 Jul
inferno13–70.1237%19 Jul
cache13–30.1223%19 Jul
dust211–13-0.068%18 Jul
inferno6–13-0.076%18 Jul
ancient6–13-0.040%18 Jul
dust210–13-0.0911%18 Jul
inferno13–40.087%14 Jun
dust216–12-0.0223%14 Jun
dust26–13-0.040%10 May
inferno8–80.0927%8 May
inferno4–9-0.1818%7 May
mirage13–11-0.0318%3 May
dust211–130.0027%3 May
inferno13–20.0521%3 May
dust213–8-0.054%3 May
dust213–16-0.0025%2 May
inferno14–16-0.077%2 May
inferno16–12-0.0125%2 May
inferno4–13-0.086%2 May
anubis13–6-0.0312%2 May
inferno13–80.0217%2 May
dust216–14-0.0412%26 Apr
dust213–9-0.0613%26 Apr
inferno9–4-0.1430%19 Apr
inferno13–110.0715%19 Apr
dust213–6-0.0313%18 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0511%18 Apr
dust22–13-0.0620%18 Apr
dust213–60.0415%11 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0614%11 Apr
dust29–13-0.0224%11 Apr
inferno13–90.0220%11 Apr
dust211–130.0213%5 Apr
mirage7–13-0.118%28 Mar
inferno4–7-0.0135%28 Mar
inferno11–13-0.067%28 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0410%28 Mar
dust213–90.0619%28 Mar
dust213–40.0718%28 Mar
inferno12–120.0312%22 Mar
dust212–12-0.0714%22 Mar
mirage9–13-0.114%22 Mar
dust213–7-0.0512%14 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0729%22 Feb
dust213–8-0.018%1 Feb
inferno13–20.0318%1 Feb
mirage10–13-0.024%31 Jan
inferno13–50.0516%18 Jan
dust213–9-0.0141%17 Jan
ancient3–13-0.0515%17 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0513%17 Jan
train2–13-0.0911%17 Jan
dust213–9-0.0412%13 Jan
inferno13–8-0.033%13 Jan
dust21–9-0.0713%13 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0918%11 Jan
inferno15–150.0615%11 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0325%6 Jan
inferno13–40.0224%6 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0325%6 Jan
dust29–130.0829%6 Jan
inferno12–16-0.066%6 Jan
inferno3–13-0.0163%5 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →