beep — CS2 Stats

MC76561198299037651[U:1:338771923]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,567Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,744Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11055 of 37048 tracked

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning52

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–40–2Last 10058%Win rateWLWWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression8.4

Utility5.1

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels4.2

Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 626ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning5.2

Utility5.1

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time635ms−3ms

first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms

Headshot accuracy22.6%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — warden 13–7

13–2Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

2–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	28	14–14	50%	0.02
inferno	S	24	18–6	75%	0.04
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	0.00
dust2	A	11	6–5	55%	0.02
overpass	B	6	3–3	50%	0.04
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	0.05
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	0.01
nuke	D	5	1–4	20%	0.01
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.12
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	0.24
alpine	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

767Matches

54%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

76.7ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	90	54%	1.11	14.7
Anubis	75	57%	1.19	15.6
Ancient	73	44%	1.04	15.3
Inferno	71	62%	1.21	15.6
Dust2	38	53%	0.99	14.0
Vertigo	19	47%	1.03	16.5
Overpass	13	92%	1.42	17.4
Nuke	6	50%	1.29	17.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy

37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.7%Spray accuracy

85.1%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

626msReaction time

35.9%T opening success

57.6%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

3.9%Flash assists

9.31HE damage / grenade

6.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.9192% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	19–16	0.05	32%	27 Aug →
ancient	17–19	-0.01	25%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.00	9%	23 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.00	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.05	18%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	22%	3 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.11	20%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	29%	22 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.08	24%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.01	21%	20 Jun →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	19%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.11	20%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.07	25%	20 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	37%	19 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	21%	19 Jun →
inferno	12–16	-0.02	29%	2 Jun →
overpass	5–13	-0.00	21%	27 May →
mirage	13–3	0.06	32%	27 May →
inferno	13–2	0.04	16%	27 May →
overpass	13–6	0.09	27%	27 May →
mirage	10–13	0.06	14%	24 May →
ancient	13–7	0.05	27%	24 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	31%	24 May →
dust2	6–13	0.08	26%	23 May →
mirage	13–3	0.06	12%	22 May →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	22%	21 May →
inferno	13–8	0.06	17%	18 May →
mirage	13–9	0.07	28%	17 May →
inferno	13–5	0.09	18%	17 May →
inferno	16–13	0.02	15%	17 May →
cache	13–9	-0.03	17%	15 May →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	14%	4 May →
poseidon	9–6	0.12	40%	4 May →
mirage	13–3	0.07	18%	4 May →
cache	3–13	0.12	31%	1 May →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	14%	1 May →
cache	13–9	0.07	26%	29 Apr →
cache	13–9	0.08	30%	29 Apr →
train	7–13	0.04	21%	25 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.06	25%	23 Apr →
nuke	13–6	0.13	22%	17 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.08	34%	15 Apr →
warden	13–7	0.24	33%	15 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.00	32%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–7	0.06	23%	10 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	27%	10 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	26%	9 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.08	23%	9 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.08	21%	8 Apr →
overpass	9–1	0.07	29%	8 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	21%	8 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	7%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.06	18%	4 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	18%	4 Apr →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	20%	4 Apr →
ancient	7–13	0.05	26%	4 Apr →
nuke	3–13	-0.11	31%	2 Apr →
overpass	13–3	0.06	39%	1 Apr →
alpine	6–13	-0.00	20%	31 Mar →
ancient	7–13	0.00	11%	31 Mar →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	19%	31 Mar →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	24%	30 Mar →
dust2	13–9	0.14	30%	30 Mar →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	18%	29 Mar →
inferno	7–13	0.03	36%	12 Mar →
anubis	13–9	0.03	29%	6 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.12	34%	4 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	20%	3 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.02	26%	28 Feb →
inferno	11–13	0.02	34%	28 Feb →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	13%	26 Feb →
anubis	13–7	0.03	35%	25 Feb →
inferno	15–15	0.05	15%	25 Feb →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	18%	25 Feb →
dust2	12–12	0.14	46%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.05	21%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.02	19%	19 Feb →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	25%	18 Feb →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	20%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.08	19%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–8	0.03	17%	18 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.03	26%	18 Feb →
nuke	11–13	0.02	19%	17 Feb →
overpass	7–13	-0.02	33%	17 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	28%	17 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.00	20%	14 Feb →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	26%	14 Feb →
nuke	4–13	0.02	21%	14 Feb →
inferno	13–5	0.07	25%	9 Feb →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	46%	9 Feb →
overpass	7–13	0.01	19%	6 Feb →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	18%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	30%	5 Feb →
mirage	13–2	-0.03	28%	3 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.13	33%	3 Feb →
mirage	12–16	-0.00	19%	2 Feb →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	18%	31 Jan →
anubis	13–8	0.02	18%	31 Jan →
inferno	13–3	0.09	43%	31 Jan →
inferno	13–5	0.19	25%	31 Jan →