muddy water

muddy water — CS2 Stats

BL76561198293750765[U:1:333485037]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,127Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,543Purple band · top ~22.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 904 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,127 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 28 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,543 -569 28 May6 Sept · 36 days played
14,17518,751peak 18,75128 May6 Sept
Faceit ELO: 904 +0 31 Aug6 Sept · 5 observations
904904peak 90431 Aug6 Sept
18,751Peak Premier in tracked matches
904Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-05-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 904
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 147 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,208 below peak (18,751)
  • +1,543 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,141 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,457 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmuddy waterFACEITLevel 4 · 904 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,543 · Purple bandPEAK ELO904csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning56
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48475Last 10048%Win rateLLLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility4.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning5.6
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time631ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 15 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · dust2, 21 Jul
453msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · cache, 3 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 16 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L4Current streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 21ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%-0.01
dust2B23111248%-0.00
cacheA2112957%-0.01
nukeB179853%-0.00
ancientD61517%-0.01
inferno2020%-0.07
eldorado1010%-0.19
vertigo110100%0.01
poseidon1010%-0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

30Matches
47%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
65.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2862%0.7713.0
Mirage667%0.8816.3
Cache450%1.1215.5
Ancient40%0.7513.0
Nuke333%0.8312.7
Anubis20%0.428.5
Inferno250%0.698.0
Train1100%0.5910.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
635msReaction time
43.2%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
8.35HE damage / grenade
6.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4778 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–13-0.0621%27 Aug
nuke5–13-0.044%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0233%26 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0424%26 Aug
mirage16–140.0132%25 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0528%24 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0127%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0712%21 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0410%18 Aug
dust216–13-0.0114%18 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0016%18 Aug
cache13–50.0318%17 Aug
dust22–13-0.0320%16 Aug
dust213–70.0125%16 Aug
cache13–90.0120%16 Aug
nuke13–1-0.0017%16 Aug
mirage13–40.0614%16 Aug
cache13–50.0033%16 Aug
cache16–13-0.0421%15 Aug
mirage13–100.1113%15 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0121%6 Aug
mirage9–130.0416%6 Aug
dust213–3-0.0312%6 Aug
nuke13–2-0.038%5 Aug
mirage13–30.0735%5 Aug
cache14–16-0.0721%5 Aug
cache13–100.0311%3 Aug
cache13–70.0731%3 Aug
cache3–13-0.0614%2 Aug
dust29–130.0221%2 Aug
dust213–110.0120%2 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0316%29 Jul
cache2–13-0.0614%29 Jul
nuke13–90.0416%29 Jul
dust211–13-0.0311%28 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0330%23 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0322%22 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0118%22 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0815%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0324%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0018%21 Jul
dust20–13-0.0250%21 Jul
ancient4–130.0019%20 Jul
cache13–10-0.027%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0443%20 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0416%20 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0134%19 Jul
dust213–8-0.0615%19 Jul
cache13–110.0118%19 Jul
dust213–50.0416%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0314%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.0115%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0524%16 Jul
eldorado2–9-0.1918%16 Jul
dust213–80.0130%16 Jul
cache13–50.0317%15 Jul
dust210–13-0.0524%15 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0113%15 Jul
cache15–15-0.0115%15 Jul
cache13–90.019%14 Jul
cache13–9-0.0115%14 Jul
dust210–130.0717%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0010%13 Jul
nuke13–40.0242%13 Jul
mirage14–160.0115%11 Jul
dust210–130.0440%11 Jul
cache7–13-0.0940%10 Jul
dust213–70.0018%10 Jul
nuke7–130.0320%10 Jul
cache6–13-0.0410%9 Jul
cache10–130.0018%8 Jul
dust210–13-0.0212%6 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0715%23 Jun
dust211–13-0.0223%22 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0026%22 Jun
nuke13–9-0.116%17 Jun
nuke13–90.0419%17 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0122%15 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0310%15 Jun
inferno7–9-0.0722%15 Jun
vertigo9–50.018%15 Jun
poseidon5–9-0.1820%15 Jun
nuke7–130.0619%14 Jun
dust211–10.0725%13 Jun
ancient12–120.0413%13 Jun
dust212–12-0.0127%13 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0423%11 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0413%11 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0511%11 Jun
ancient15–150.0222%11 Jun
dust27–13-0.0018%10 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0519%10 Jun
mirage13–1-0.0333%10 Jun
nuke13–50.0216%10 Jun
mirage13–60.0712%8 Jun
dust213–6-0.0122%8 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0313%29 May
nuke16–130.0417%29 May
dust24–130.0220%28 May
mirage14–160.0625%28 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →